New Gmail tool has its priorities wrong

Google has launched a new Gmail tool that claims to take the hassle out of filtering incoming messages. But it looks to be a treatment of symptoms rather than a cure for disease.

The new “Priority Inbox” is an optional feature that splits your Gmail inbox into three section. One is simply messages you have marked with a star, while another is the general inbox. The remaining section, which appears at the top of the list, is for “important and unread” messages.

Which messages end up here is decided by Gmail itself using a formula taking into account how often you open and exchange messages with a specific sender. In addition, you can also click TiVo-style buttons to mark messages as important or unimportant. Finally, you can use filters to automatically override the formula and have particular types of message labeled as important.

If you are overloaded with e-mails, this new feature may help you streamline your inbox, though it likely won’t be long till we hear complaints that a genuinely vital message was buried away in the “everything else” pile.

The problem is that these new features don’t tackle the underlying cause of the build-up of e-mails. If you’ve got too many e-mails then either you aren’t dealing with them efficiently and effectively, or you haven’t taken steps to make sure you don’t get overloaded with messages you don’t need.

The first issue is relatively simple to deal with: you just need either to be ruthless enough to cancel subscriptions to newsletters you never read, or to do a better job of filtering messages that aren’t imperative.

The second issue is the territory of Inbox Zero. That’s the simple philosophy that every time you open your inbox, you process all the messages and leave it empty. Processing does not mean you have to deal with the message or reply to it, but rather that you decide what type of message it is and file it appropriately so that you can keep track of what really needs doing.

Gina Trapani at LifeHacker has written the best explanation I’ve seen, but the concept is nothing more complex than three folders (or labels in Gmail) and a three-point checklist. The three folders are Action, Reference and Archive (the latter of which can simply be the read messages archive in Gmail.)

The checklist, which you run through for all new messages as soon as you open them is:

1) Will I ever need to read this message again? If the answer’s a definite no, delete it.

2) Do I need to take action? If so and it will take less than a minute or two, do it and then archive the message. If the action will take longer, label the message as Action.

3) Will I either need to refer to the message in the imminent future or want to save it to read later (e.g. a long newsletter)? If so, label the message as Reference.

Anything left after this can be archived. As and when you take the necessary action, read the message or no longer need it for handy reference, take off the Action or Reference label.

Follow these guidelines and you’ll empty your inbox in a few moments every time, stop wasting time processing messages over and over again, avoid missing out on an important message because it got buried away in a pile of unread e-mail, and, simply by clicking on the Action label, be able to see what’s effectively your e-mail based to-do list.

Off to Dragon*Con

You might notice I won’t be posting as much in the next few days, but it’s for a very geeky cause: I’ll be going to Dragon*Con!

This is the third year that I’ve gone to the Atlanta-based fan convention, and every year I experience, well, something altogether different. When that many costumed geeks descend on a city there’s always something to talk about, write about, and stare at in wonder. I mean, I’m a geek. But there are some people who just take fandom to a level I simply don’t have the dedication to pull off. I end up spending half my time at the convention just watching the detail on the costumes and accessories as well as the clear passion exhibited in their presentations. And I always feel, on some level anyway, that the con is my home away from home. These people get me. These tens of thousands of people get me! It’s a comforting feeling indeed, rivaled only by my one experience at PAX:East.

But beyond that, this year’s celebrity lineup is truly impressive. I was lucky enough to see Sean Astin two years ago, and he’s back again this year. As well, a good chunk of the Firefly crew will be present, including Summer Glau, Morena Baccharin and Jewel Staite. Not to mention quite a few in the Star Trek and Battlestar Galactica contingents. Oh, and Stan Lee. And dozens of others I just don’t have the space to detail. Suffice it to say, there will be plenty for me to do while I’m in Atlanta (crossing my fingers it won’t be as hot this year as it was last year)!

So, if you’re going to Dragon*Con, I’ll be wandering around covering the extravaganza from Thursday to Monday. You’re most likely to find me in the literature tracks, the steampunk tracks, and oogling books in the vendor area. Feel free to track me down on Twitter, too. I’ll mostly likely be in some form of steampunk gear.

For those of you who can’t attend, is there anything happening at Dragon*Con that you’d like to hear about? Let me know in the comments, and I’ll see what I can do. I’ll be taking lots of pictures, that’s for sure. But if there’s any events or anything that you want me to keep an eye out for? I’m always happy to oblige the crowd.

Hopefully I’ll have some time to post on the go, but the way these conventions go, you never know. I have found that the less I plan the more likely I am to have fun and just go with the flow!

DARPA wants to build a learning computer

Hello, Professor Falken.

DARPA is a division of the U.S. Department of Defense tasked with developing new technology for use by the military. Their most famous project was called ARPAnet, which eventually became the Internet. They define the term “scary smart,” and while some of their technology trickles down to the civilian sector, most of it is designed to enable the U.S. Military, which sometimes involve helping people and building things, and at other times, killing people and breaking things.

Dr. Robert Kohout, an expert in artificial intelligence, is developing a program called “PAL” for DARPA’s Information Processing Techniques Office.

The PAL project has five main goals:

  1. Enable machines to learn and improve their basic functionality through the accumulation of experience (and not through being explicitly programmed).
  2. Can represent purpose/goals, system structure, and behavior, in order to allow a computational system to reflect on its own capabilities and performance.
  3. Allow the software to be instructed and guided using natural human-oriented communications (e.g., natural language, pictures, gestures).
  4. Have the ability of the software to use visual and auditory sensors to understand the user’s situation (who is in the meeting, who is speaking, etc).
  5. Are integrated and result in fully functioning systems.

In other words, they want to build a learning computer that can understand English. And they want to hook it up to military computers.  I’ve seen this somewhere before

It seems like science fiction, but the PAL program literally list its mission as enabling systems that “can reason, learn form experience, be told what to do, explain what they are doing, reflect on their experience, and respond robustly to surprise.”

And, thankfully, DARPA has provided a video illustrating the concept:

The world’s smallest car

Made from 1962 to 1965, the world’s smallest production car – that is, made for general consumption, not the Shriners – the Peel P50 has three wheels, can go up to 38mph, and seats “one adult and a shopping bag.” She’s 54” long and 41” wide, and weighs 130 pounds.

Features do not include more than one door, blinkers, automatic transmission, or a reverse gear. What she does have is an impressive 83 MPG fuel efficiency.

You can see her in action in this video below: