What’s So Wrong With Women in Comics?

Women of DC by Adam Hughes

There’s been a lot of focus this week on the role women play in comics. It’s nothing new to see an ill-proportioned babe in an awkward pose gracing the pages of my favorite superhero books. Maybe it’s something I’ve just grown used to, or maybe I’m a traitor to my kind, but it’s not often that a character is so poorly written and objectified I feel the need to write about it. And I did. Then a day later I wondered why so much attention is being put on the negative. All the blogs, reviews and rants I’ve read only point out what’s wrong; I haven’t really seen anyone talking about what’s right with women in comics today.

And there is a lot of right going on.

It’s easy to say ladies like Wonder Woman and Supergirl provide pivotal role models for women in comics. Personally I think they are pigeonholed and oftentimes one-dimensional. It’s rare I see them written in a way that explores both their femininity and their strength.

Take a look at Marvel’s Psylocke. She’s part of the X-Force team, a deadly brigade of mutants who do the dirty work the rest of the good guys won’t touch. It’s a dark series. Psylocke, in her traditional one-piece bodysuit, is an extremely sexy character. She’s also fierce, doesn’t take crap from her teammates, and has one of the most heartwarming and wrenching relationship stories in comics today.

This series is dark, and it does deal with a lot of things that may make some readers uncomfortable. It’s also had some of the sexiest cover art I have ever seen, and the way Rick Remender writes his women in Uncanny X-Force is something people should take note of.

Matt Fraction also does as great a job of writing women as he does writing, well… anybody else. Take a look at anytime he has written about Sif in a Thor comic. Ed Brubaker took on the Catwoman relaunch in 2002 and did right by Selina Kyle after Frank Miller rewrote her origins as a prostitute. If you want to see some unmistakeably astonishing art, take a gander at the work by Adam Hughes, Mike Choi, and Jerome Opena.

Women don’t need to be written as caricatures of their species. I don’t want to read about a female superhero losing her powers during her monthly cycle, or on every other page see some girl pining over the hottest man in tights. Conversely, you don’t have a big breasted woman in a tiny bikini to get male and female readers blood boiling. What they did with Starfire and Catwoman was fan service. But again, it’s nothing new in comics. Have you ever looked at anything Michael Turner did for Top Cow? I still say it’s some of the best art you will ever see in comics.

The key is getting a someone who knows how to write a well-rounded character. And an artist who knows what anatomy is.

On the whole, I will say Marvel handles their ladies a lot better than DC. I could pick out one woman from every Marvel title I am reading and explain what is right about her. Unfortunately, I can’t say the same for DC. Almost every woman I’ve read about in the New 52 has some issue that deals with her being female: Animal Man’s wife nagging all the time, Godiva refusing to fight stone monsters because it’s too tough, and of course the naked twit that Starfire has become who can’t even remember all the men she’s slept with. All of this is just poor writing, not just the sexual objectification of women.

There are a lot of women in our comics who are amazing, strong, fun and represent the best (and worst) of my kind. We should celebrate them, and the people who write and draw them.



Batman: Arkham City’s Newest Trailer [Video]

Coulrophobics, be warned — Batman: Arkham City was designed to keep you from ever sleeping again.

Every time a new trailer comes out, I get a little more terrified and a lot more excited about this game. I hate clowns with every particle of my being; The Joker is always scary (though arguably more so here) and Mr. Hammer looks like a ‘roid-raging Sweet Tooth, but I cannot wait to play Arkham City. And the best part is that this creepy-as-hell New Joker isn’t even the primary villain. That would be Dr. Hugo Strange, who is going to have to be unconditionally evil and scarier than a giant sledge-wielding clown to top the list of things that keep me awake. Good luck, I say.

Batman: Arkham City launches Oct 18, but it’s ok to get excited right now if you want.

[joystiq]



iPhone retains its sticky crown

iPhone users really love the iPhone and plan to get a new iPhone. That’s the not-so-shocking conclusion of a new survey, albeit it one that’s got some limitations.

The survey comes from a wider report into the telecoms industry by analysts at UBS. They questioned 515 people in Europe and America, most of whom were executives, so this is hardly a comprehensively representative sample of the general public.

The results aren’t about actual retention rates, but rather what UBS is calling “survey implied retention rates.” In other words, they asked existing users if they’ll get the same brand of hardware next time they upgrade. That means there’s no accounting for the pattern of “I’m never buying anything from this piece of crap company ag… OOH SHINY NEW!”

Even with those limitation, the results were pretty dramatic. Of the Apple phone owners questioned, 89% said they’d stick with Apple next time. Second place was HTC with just 39%, followed by RIM at 33%, Samsung 28%, Motorola at 25% and Nokia at 24%.

It’s arguable the RIM figure is more significant than Apple’s “stickiness”: in a similar survey in 2010, 62% claimed they’d stick with the brand next time around. Given that if you’re getting a BlackBerry you’re getting it from RIM, that’s not a good sign for the device, particularly given these are largely business users being questioned.

I wouldn’t read too much into the figures for the other brands. After all, if you know you’re getting an iPhone next time round, then you are certain you’ll be buying Apple. If you’re thinking of sticking with Android, it still makes sense that you’ll be exploring multiple manufacturers. And the survey doesn’t give much insight into the difference between “I’m definitely ditching my current manufacturer” and “I’m going to shop around.”

The other main limitation of the results is that it doesn’t give us a timescale. There’s a big difference between “My next handset will also be an iPhone” and “I’ll be camping outside the Apple store to get an iPhone 5 at midnight.”

Satellite Expected to Fall Out of Orbit on Friday

Well, at least gravity hasn’t been disproved today. The defunct Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite is expected to return to earth on Friday, and NASA says the debris could spread across 500-miles. Problem is, no one knows exactly where it’s going to land.

As of 9:30 p.m. EDT Sept. 22, 2011, the orbit of UARS was 110 mi by 115 mi (175 km by 185 km). Re-entry is possible sometime during the afternoon or early evening of Sept. 23, Eastern Daylight Time. The satellite will not be passing over North America during that time period. It is still too early to predict the time and location of re-entry with any more certainty, but predictions will become more refined in the next 24 hours.

A few things expected to survive the burn-up include four steel flywheel rims, a 350-pound aluminum structure, and four titanium fuel tanks. Depending on the shape and size of the junk, their speed of impact will be between 55mph and 240mph.

[Via NASA]

New Facebook Rage [Comic]

This is pretty much what happens each time Facebook decides to make some changes to to their interface.

[Endless Origami]