Another technology which could only be seen in sci-fi movies a decade ago will soon be available to law enforcement agencies everywhere. Check it out:
[Via Newlaunches]
Another technology which could only be seen in sci-fi movies a decade ago will soon be available to law enforcement agencies everywhere. Check it out:
[Via Newlaunches]
By Jimmy Rogers (@me)
Contributing Writer, [GAS]
You can read about science all you like, but until you see it in live action you never grasp the little moments that fill you with wonder. Here is such a moment for me…
This past semester my professor showed us the following video of a neutrophil (a kind of white blood cell) chasing after a Staphylococcus aureus bacterium. Keep in mind that there is no “intelligence” going on here, the cells can only move in response to millions of independent environmental stimuli:
For those of you interested, here’s what’s happening:
First of all, the class I was taking was graduate cellular structure and function, which overviews all of the major components of the cell and how they generally function. The day my instructor showed us the video we were reviewing the cytoskeleton, literally “the skeleton of the cell.”
Each time the neutrophil (the bigger cell) moves, it physically stretches its membrane out in the direction it wants to go while pulling on its membrane at the opposite end, accomplished by growing and shrinking various parts of its cytoskeleton. This video is fantastic because you can actually see the membrane push forward before the contents of the cell (organelles, storage vacuoles, and phagosomes) slosh forward to fill in the new space.
The bacterial cell moves a little differently. S. aureus has a fairly rigid cell wall, so expanding out parts of its membrane like little “false feet” (pseudopodia) is not a viable way to move. Instead, it likely uses flagella, long whip-like tails. While it’s hard to direct a cell in a specific direction with flagella (which only spin in one of two directions), they are quite effective at going “anywhere but here” as you can see in the video.
Regardless of the method by which the cells move, they both respond to environmental signals. In their outer membranes, each cell has numerous receptors that are constantly “tasting” the environment for “good” (attractors) and “bad” (repellers) particles. When the bacteria “tastes” the macrophage’s normal secretions or touches it physically, it responds by swimming away. These signalling systems may seem primitive, but they make such a chase as you see above possible on a micro level.
If you can’t tell, cell motility is what I’m currently studying in the laboratory. Feel free to check out my blog or my Twitter feed, links are in my signature above!
Whether or not this has been a long time in coming, the time has come – the New York Times has announced that it will be charging for “frequent” access to its website. Visitors will be able to view a certain number of articles each month for free, after which they can pay a flat fee for unlimited access; this change is slated to occur in January 2011.
The goal here is apparently “to create a system that would have little effect on the millions of occasional visitors to the site, while trying to cash in on the loyalty of more devoted readers.” Of course, they haven’t decided the specifics yet, like how much you can get for free and how much you’ll have to pay when that runs out. This is a step that other large media outlets have been dancing around for a while now, ever since the “death of print media” seemed to be lurking just around the corner, and NYT needs to get this exactly right, or they’re really going to be in a mess.
You may recall that a few years ago NYT charged for online content, and it didn’t work so well; they nixed that in the hopes that advertising dollars through high readership would make up the difference, but that model hasn’t performed to their expectations. Of course, the Wall Street Journal still charges for unlimited access; whether that has hurt them or not, I couldn’t say.
Putting aside the issue of whether bloggers are to blame for professional journalism’s financial woes, considering how things simply are, how many people really are willing to pay for their news? Is the trusted brand of New York Times or Wall Street Journal worth a subscription fee? Do you think you’d be in the group of “frequent” readers who would max out your allotted free access? What would you be willing to pay? Or would you just prefer to get your news from whatever outlets are left that don’t charge?
Michael Deal, a remarkably talented graphic designer, has taken up a rather monumental project which he calls Charting the Beatles. While the title may sound simple, the breathtaking graphs that he’s created are anything but. Considering that I’m a huge fan of the Beatles and an absolute data nut, this project is absolutely enthralling for me.
My personal favorites include the collaboration chart, the self-reference chart, and the song key charts, all giving visual representation to an amazing period of music creation and influence and rock and roll. Deal’s charts are all visually lovely and vary widely from subject to subject–an absolutely must-read for music and chart geeks alike!
Man, I could look at these all day.
[via @oldbie on Twitter]
[Photo: Michael Deal Graphic Design, a graphic of the keys used in the Beatles album Revolver]
If you’re a guy and a gamer, you’ll definitely want to read this:
One in five women have dumped their partner because of their web or gaming habits, says MyVoucherCodes.
Research by the UK online discount site revealed that 80 per cent of women claim their other half spends too much time playing computer games or browsing the web. Furthermore, 70 per cent said the gaming addiction was the cause of arguments between the couple.
So, geeks and geekettes, do you agree with the result of this study? Have you ever dumped someone over his gaming habits? As usual, the comments section is open for your stories!
I was really, really looking forward to playing that game, but unfortunately, I have a PS3, and the game is only available for pre-order (release date: jan. 26) on PC and Xbox 360 as of now.
Yes folks, the Voice Band iPhone app will transform your voice into a musical instrument in real time. Just sing into the iPhone, and your humming will become a guitar, a bass, a synth, and lots more! Only $3 at the iPhone app store.
[Via Gizmag]
The Internet was all a thither yesterday with rumors that Peter Jackson and Guillermo del Toro had finalized casting for Bilbo in The Hobbit… with Tobey Maguire. The Twittersphere went bananas, and after a few hours, we heard directly from the source, and the directors assured the panic-ridden public that they were still a month away from finding their Bilbo.
Did you hear that collective sigh of relief? I know I did.
But all this speculation begs a few questions and brings to light some inherent issues with casting such a monumental role. The biggest problem with casting Bilbo is that he’s really the sole hobbit, and truly the most important role in the film. There’s no hobbit supporting cast this time around, no Pippin or Samwise. Sure, there’s a lot of dwarves, a dragon, and some familiar faces (we’ll see Ian McKellan as Gandalf and Hugo Weaving as Elrond again) but much of The Hobbit revolves around Bilbo’s solitary adventures as he gets separated from the group time and again.
At any rate, here are a few things I hope that the casting directors will take into consideration when casting Bilbo.
Tags: guillermo del toro, hobbit, hobbits, lord of the rings, peter jackson, tobey maguire