TED Talk: The Art of Choosing [Video]

Sheena Iyengar studies how we make choices — and how we feel about the choices we make. In the following video, she talks about both trivial choices (Coke v. Pepsi) and profound ones, and shares her groundbreaking research that has uncovered some surprising attitudes about our decisions.



Fighting games collide in ultimate rumble

The world of entertainment has given us plenty of classic crossover clashes over the years. ESPN brought us Rocky Marciano vs Muhammad Ali, while movies presented both Freddie vs Jason and Alien vs Predator, though sadly the two winners didn’t move on to meet in the final.

Now Capcom is releasing the fighting game Street Fighter X Tekken, the X being “cross” and referring to the crossover rather than the traditional “versus”. That may be a clue that the game will be more about individual characters clashing than a full on factional war, though it may also just be the results of English-Japanese translations.

While few details have been released so far, it will be a Capcom-produced game using characters licensed by Tekken manufacturers Namco, meaning the gameplay will probably be closer to Street Fighter.

To make things really interesting, though, Namco will have a later release named Tekken vs Street Fighter, which in turn looks likely to be Street Fighter characters ported to the Tekken game engine. The two companies have even implied that they will be locked in a genuine competition to produce the better game, which means the industry will be watching sales figures closely.

It’s been confirmed that characters will bring their signature moves to the new games. What isn’t so clear is to what extent designers will make sure both sets of characters are balanced: there’ll certainly be a temptation to sneakily set things up so that the “invading” characters are more likely to lose.

This isn’t the first time characters from the two games have interacted (and I’m not talking about the seamier side of fan fiction). The 2005 PS2 release Namco x Capcom brought together characters from both company’s catalog in a role playing game.

Epic DC Universe Online Promo Trailer

After watching this, here’s one question to you: Why does Hollywood keep making live-action superhero movies when CGI is now clearly advanced enough to make absolutely anything possible?

[Via Reddit]



New DMCA Exemptions Legalize Phone Jailbreaking & DVD Ripping for Fair Use

If you’re in the United States you might know that there’s this very confusing copyright law called the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA, that (in short) criminalizes certain means of circumventing copyright protection (i.e., digital rights management, or DRM, i.e., that stuff that wouldn’t let you play your MP3s wherever you want). The DMCA is also what led to the implementation of takedown notices on sites like YouTube, which has been criticized for encouraging website owners to take down non-infringing work at the behest of copyright owners (which has led to some bad press situations, like silencing teenage girls singing in their bedrooms and dancing babies).

One of the good things about the law, however, is that it does take into account the potential for changing technology – which is why every few years there is a rulemaking session where people or organizations can submit proposals to the Copyright Office for exemptions to the law. During the last session, about a year and a half ago, the Electronic Frontier Foundation in coordination with some other groups submitted a proposal with two large initiatives: (1) to legalize “jailbreaking” your phone; and (2) to legalize ripping DVDs and other activities to circumvent copyright protection, as long as the purpose is to create a  video that is found to be fair use. (Previously, even if your final product was entirely legal in that you made fair use of, say, clips from a movie, you could still be in trouble due to the anti-circumvention laws.) The Copyright Office has announced that these exemptions have been added, along with several others. Here’s a basic run-down of the six new exemptions:

  1. Circumventing a DVD’s encryption in order to use short portions in a work that is either for educational purposes, part of a documentary, or non-commercial;
  2. Jailbreaking your phone to use lawfully obtained software (i.e., you can put Google voice on your iPhone if you want to);
  3. Jailbreaking your phone so you can use a different network (i.e., if you want to use T-Mobile on your iPhone);
  4. Circumventing video game encryption for the purpose of security testing or investigation;
  5. Cracking computer programs protected by dongles that are obsolete; and
  6. Distributing a literary work that can be read aloud (i.e., by screen readers for the blind) even when there are access controls to prevent it

This is actually really big news, especially on the phone jailbreaking front – and frankly, a big surprise. Though besides being able to (legally) mess with your phone, this can be considered a triumph on another geek front – for vidders. The Organization for Transformative Works was behind the proposal as well, championing the rights of video remixers, especially those who create music videos as works of fan culture criticism and commentary.

So though the video below may or may not be entirely legal according to U.S. copyright law (there’s some interesting arguments about fair use of the video versus the music), at least now we know that it wasn’t illegal to rip the DVDs to make it.

And some of the other vids that were actually pointed to in the proposal itself as examples of the artistic genre are available here.

[Image Source: joegratz (CC)]

The Birth and Death of a Lightning Bolt

This short video, slowed down exactly 300 times, shows the birth and death of a lightning bolt. Enjoy!

[Via Scienceblogs]

Study Unleases Torrent of Criticism

An Australian university has estimated that just 0.3% of files shared through BitTorrent are definitely legal. But torrent advocates have questioned the methodology of the study.

The report (PDF), from the University of Ballarat’s Internet Commerce Security Laboratory, involved a random selection of 1,000 torrent files. Of those:

  • 890 were confirmed to breach copyright
  • 91 were pornographic content which purported to be “amateur” material but where it was not possible to confirm the copyright owner had given permission for them to be shared
  • 16 were of uncertain legality
  • 3 were confirmed as being distributed with permission.

The report also noted that the most common categories were movies, music and television shows, in which all the torrents breached copyright laws. Listed by the number of people seeding (that is, sharing the complete file or files), all but one of the ten most popular files were movies.

However, there has been some questioning of the report’s accuracy. TorrentFreak gives the best breakdown of the potential problems, including:

The selection was not entirely random, but rather taken from the most-seeded files. That means categories such as books and software, which could have more legal torrents, are under-represented.

The figures for the number of seeds for particular torrents appear massively overstated (some had a million or more seeds listed despite being two years old), suggesting bogus data has been used. In particular, the number of seeds listed for the top ten torrents bears no relation to any confirmed figures. It look suspiciously like the report includes a lot of torrents which are fake and don’t contain the files they claim to.

Other figures don’t tally up: for example, one site which only distributes torrents of legal music files currently makes up 1.5% of all torrents on a major site.

Of course, nobody is seriously disputing that the vast majority of torrent files do contain copyright-breaching material, but if those calling for tighter copyright controls are going to use statistics, it is important their methodology isn’t open to question.