We’ve posted videos of beatboxers a few times here on [GaS], but now, let us present you with something a little different, a fluteboxer, someone who plays the flute while beatboxing at the same time.
[Via Videosift]
If you were to transcribe every word you saw or heard during a week, the result would be longer than War and Peace. That’s one of the statistics thrown up by a report that finds the average person now reads three times as much as their 1980s counterpart, thanks mainly to computers in general and the Internet in particular.
The headline statistic from the research by the Global Information Industry Center is that the US population as a whole consumed 3.6 zettabytes of information during 2008. That fact appears to have been given prominence mainly so that the authors can show off having heard the unit “zettabyte”: it’s equal to one million million gigabytes.
Expressed in a slightly more manageable way, the figure works out as 1005000 words and 34 gigabytes per person each day. That’s 4.72Mbps, meaning we receive data quicker than many broadband connections could supply it. (It’s also equivalent to 2.1GB of data each hour, which would be enough for my cable provider to throttle my brain if it had the chance.)
The data figure is based on all information users experience, including TV pictures. The study only covers information consumed at home rather than work, and notes that on average we spend 11.8 hours per day receiving information at home. Throw in sleep and work and that doesn’t seem to make sense until you remember to account for weekends, holidays and people who don’t work. Probably more significantly, the same hour can be counted twice if somebody is, for example, “watching” TV while using the internet. Even with that in mind, it’s clear that for the average citizen there is very little time when they aren’t receiving information.
The most surprising note is that video games are responsible for 55% of the information received by people at home, simply because of the level of detail in animated graphics.
The figures recorded for the study are purely for the information which the consumer actually hears or consumes. The authors note this leaves out data such as the content of commercials which are recorded on a DVR but skipped through.
While consumption of print media is on the decline, the presence of the internet means people today actually read considerably more. Indeed, whereas in 1980 only around 12% of the words people came across each day were read rather than heard, today that figure is around 36%.
The study also looks back at figures gathered since 1980 and notes that although improvements in technology has meant the potential information we can receive increases by around 30% each year, the actual information we receive only increases by a little over 5 percent. However, that does add up to a four-fold increase over the past three decades.
The main reason for this relatively slow rate of increase is that TV dominates our information consumption, but the level of information carried by a broadcast has changed little over the past 30 years because the technology itself is virtually identical. That’s likely to change significantly as people switch to more detailed high-definition pictures.
As you’d imagine, the data is drawn from a variety of sources and includes a huge degree of estimation and extrapolation.
The folks at Google have just released an awesome new video promoting the Chrome browser with its many features. Check it out:
The British government has confirmed it will introduce a tax on phone lines, designed to fund expansion of broadband services across the vast majority of the country. But the electoral timetable makes it questionable how long the tax would apply for, if at all.
The aim of the tax is to subsidize extending broadband to homes where phone and broadband companies do not consider it profitable to fund line upgrades. Although more than 50 countries around the world have some form of government scheme to expand broadband beyond that which would be provided by the free market, this appears to be the first case of a specific tax to fund expansion.
Britain had already committed to getting speeds of 2Mbps available in “virtually all” homes by 2012. In confirming the tax today, Chancellor (finance minister) Alistair Darling (pictured) said the money would also help ensure 90% of homes had “super-fast” broadband by 2017.
The tax of £6 (approx US$10 per year) would actually be charged to the telephone line provider, so it remains to be seen how much if any of this would be passed on to the customer.
It’s a strange way of collecting the tax as telephone use is so common that nearly everyone will be paying it and the money might as well be collected as part of general taxation. There isn’t even that much of a logical link between telephone line rental and broadband provision: people without a computer will still have to pay the tax, while the fact that the tax is apparently on copper phonelines means people who get both phone and broadband services through fiber-optic cable (and thus get some of the best speeds currently available) will escape the tax.
The proposal is as close to guaranteed as possible to become law. That’s because it is part of an overall finance (or budgetary) bill, which it is almost unheard of for government parliament members to fail to get the backing of Parliament.
However, there is an election due by next June at the latest, at which polls suggest there is a strong possibility of a change of government. The main opposition party has already said it would scrap the broadband tax if it took power.
The proposal for the tax came in a report titled Digital Britain. That same report also proposed a tax break for British video game developers, an idea rejected by Darling today. That’s led to criticism that without the tax break, British firms may lose key staff to high-paying rivals in other countries.
By covering a simple piece of paper with ink made of carbon nanotubes and silver nanowires, Stanford researchers were able to create a simple, low-cost battery, which can be used almost anywhere, allowing for many clever applications. Check it out in the video below.
“This technology has potential to be commercialized within a short time,” said Peidong Yang, professor of chemistry at the University of California-Berkeley. “I don’t think it will be limited to just energy storage devices,” he said. “This is potentially a very nice, low-cost, flexible electrode for any electrical device.”
[Via Stanford University]
Since we’re all about blowing into, or onto things here at [GaS], I figured posting a video of the Robo-Air Jet System would be appropriate. Be sure the watch the whole clip, as the most impressive stuff starts at 0:43.
Automated Manipulation of Spherical Objects in Three Dimensions Using a Gimbaled Air Jet. Developed at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Video presented at IROS 2009.
[Via [H]]
Over the past ten years, I have found that kids will ask for anything they see on TV for Christmas. They are excited to open those gifts and then they lose interest. I tend to also get them something they would never think of themselves that I would enjoy myself, and those are the gifts that provide lasting memories. Trust your own instincts when buying gifts for children. The odds are, if it’s something you would play with, they will love it.
You already bought them every kind of LEGO set, so how about a cool LEGO accessory? The LEGO Dynamo Torch is a rechargeable flashlight that sends a LED beam from the LEGO man’s foot. Batteries are included, and you never have to buy any more. Recharge them by cranking his arm! Yes, that’s the beauty – your child will learn the value of power and how much work goes into producing it. $19.99 from Amazon.com.
Robots? Build it yourself? Solar power? What’s not to like about this kit? The 6 in 1 Solar Robot Kit is advertised as “educational” because of the solar power, which I suppose is a good thing. This little pocket-sized generator runs the kinetics of the robot outside on sunny days, or inside under a 50-watt halogen lamp. The parts go together to form six different shapes of robot: a car, a puppy, an airboat, a plane, a windmill, and another plane that flies around a pole. No screws are involved in the assembly, so it should go pretty fast. And when you get tired of one configuration, just reassemble it into another shape! $19.99 from Robotikits, or £0.99 across the pond from Iwantoneofthose.
…and by saying that this is an iPhone killer, I’m clearly making an understatement. Check out the promo video below, you’ll understand why what I mean right away.
[Via Gizmodo]
Some rather surprising revelations about what the Internet truly is:
Did you know that the Internet is just a bunch of fax machines expressing the thoughts of someone who lived 8,000 years ago?
By Natania Barron
Contributing Writer, [GaS]
Unfortunately, though the world might be getting more and more geek friendly by the minute, being a geek girl is still difficult. So I’m appealing to you, Geeks Are Sexy readers, to consider a few things when approaching us in the, um, wild. I’m drawing on real experience here, and while every geek girl is different, I think most of these tips are good to keep in mind. So it’s not exactly exhaustive, but a good place to start.
Don’t assume that she’s had “help” rolling up her character or that she’s only playing D&D for the RP aspect (or because of her significant other). Seriously, people. I know enough girl RPGers to know we can be as insane about min/maxing, tweaking, and speccing as anyone. Yeah, sure, maybe some of us are more dramatic than the dudes in the group on occasion. But the next time someone asks me if I just play D&D because my husband dragged me into it might get a sucker punch.
Don’t assume she’s buying comics for her significant other. Just because a woman is walking into a comics store doesn’t automatically mean she’s lost, looking for presents, for someone else, or is there on a dare. It also doesn’t mean she’s only interested in manga, Wonder Woman or Buffy comics. Take note. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Don’t assume she doesn’t like girly things. Sometimes there’s a sort of pendulum effect, treating geek girls like geek guys and assuming that we have turned against our entire gender just to get geek cred. Not so. Many of us are exceptionally girly, just not by standard definition perhaps.
Don’t assume she’s read and liked Twilight. Just don’t. Trust me on this one.
Don’t assume she only likes to read urban fantasy books with strong protagonists. And if we’re writers don’t assume we write that stuff. Many of us dig swords, guns, and classics, too.
Don’t assume we’re stupid about computers. Eternally annoying. It’s one thing to have sat and tried to fix your own computer for a few hours and resigning yourself to going to the Genuis Bar or Geek Squad, or whatever. But it’s another thing altogether to have to cope with techies talking to you about your computer as if it’s the first time you’ve ever laid eyes on this marvelous object. “Did you restart it?” “Wait, what? It restarts?”
Don’t assume we don’t like non-geeky things. Sports? Sure, I wouldn’t consider myself up on every team. But I love the Red Sox. The most insulting moment I can recall is when one of my husband’s friends would not believe I was an actual fan and quizzed me on the starting lineup. Guys, don’t be that guy.
While (I hope) many of you will laugh this off and say that you’d never presume such things, it’s still something that we geek gals deal with enough to warrant a friendly reminder.
Any geek gals out there with similar experiences to share? Any guys made some bad assumptions and want to fess up?