Angry Birds Hit by Angry Trolls

The makers of Angry Birds are being sued over alleged patent violation. And judging by the history of the plaintiffs, Rovio should probably take it as a compliment.

The addition of Rovio to an ongoing lawsuit makes it one of eleven defendants, alongside gaming heavyweights such as Atari, Electronic Arts and Take-Two.

The patent concerned was applied for by inventor Daniel H Abelow in 2006 and issued in 2009. Covering a “Customer-Based Product Design Module”, its technology involves:

“A network, including a product sub-system that interacts with a user, gathers information from the user, communicates the information to the product’s vendor, and receives new preprogrammed interactions from the vendor for future interactions with the user.”

A quick look through the patent shows a string of diagrams illustrating how the system works. And it appears to be one of the least justifiable patents in history. Perhaps I’m missing some innovative technical detail, but it appears that the patent attempts to claim credit for the idea of software gathering feedback from a user.

So are the evil gaming giants destroying a struggling tech business with their shameful intellectual property violations? Well, that’s the funny thing. The suit has been brought in the name of Lodsys, LLC. Although Abelow is listed as being from Massachusetts in the patent filing, Lodys is incorporated in East Texas, which just so happens to be the court district commonly held to be most favorable in the country to plaintiffs in trademark cases.

And if you’re looking for some Lodsys games for your iPhone, you’ll be out of luck. Visit the company’s website and click on the “About Lodsys” page and you’ll find this extensive description of the company’s work:

“The patented technologies of Lodsys, LLC are available for licensing.”

Who’s legally in the right in this case is a matter for the courts. But as far as creating a public impression goes, I think it’s clear which side is the birds and which side is the greedy pigs.


8 Responses to Angry Birds Hit by Angry Trolls

  1. This is why I want to strangle and maim those greedy, worthless, self-serving pricks to whom I'm describing some great idea I came up with, and instead of "WOW, that's a great idea! That'll help a lot of people! Maybe I can help you get that out there…", they reply with "OH MAN YOU SHOULD LIKE PATENT THAT and SELL it and why are you giving all this stuff away for FREE and you should be CHARGING people for all this stuff!!"… it's like there are people out there that are always on the lookout for any way to screw-over the "people that aren't screwing someone else over". :(

  2. There's a similar patent for describing how to transfer data through a Firewall; so vague it hurts. It essentially just says you tell the firewall you have permission to go through, pass the data to the firewall, the firewall passes the data to the computer it's protecting and the computer provides it's response in a similar manner.

  3. it should be filed as a bs patent that everyone ignores since its already in wide public use. an example of this is a kid got the patent for the wheel like 10 years ago.

  4. Does Lodsys really have the intention of making their patented concept into an actual product? It looks like they are just trying to take advantage of their intellectual property right and make some money out of these big gaming companies.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.