CallCatalog.com tries to throw the book at unwanted callers

By Sterling “Chip” Camden
Contributing Writer, [GAS]

I hate the telephone.  As far as I’m concerned, the only reason why it ever succeeded as a communication medium is because we didn’t have email (and the only reason we’re still using email is because we don’t yet have anything better).  You might argue that the phone is superior to email, because you can pick up nuances from the speaker’s voice — but I find that advantage outweighed by several other factors:

  • The phone is non-visual (at least, for now).  Even though email doesn’t show me your face either, it does show me your words.  I can run my eyes back over them as many times as I need in order to process your meaning.
  • Email is disconnected.  I don’t have to respond to your statement within seconds.  I can take my time to think about what I’ll say.
  • The telephone interrupts.  It demands my attention now (unless I turn the ringer off).

That last bullet is even more deadly when the interruption comes from someone you don’t want to talk to anyway.  And even (or maybe especially) if you add your number to the National Do Not Call Registry, telemarketers and other phone-spammers never tire of punching it in — and they seem to have a telepathic sense of when you’re eating dinner, taking a shower, or engaged in… um… other activities you hate to have interrupted.

A web site called CallCatalog seeks to provide some relief from the phone hounds.  It’s a crowd-sourced repository (that’s a fancy term for “users supply all the data”) of telephone numbers that originated calls that recipients didn’t want to receive.  You can then take the caller ID from your own harassing call and search CallCatalog’s database to get as much information about your caller as other users have supplied.  You can also add your own comments, or report a new number that’s not already in the database.

When reporting an incident, you’re asked for your name or nickname.  No sign-up is required, so these reports are essentially anonymous.  Seems to me that invites gaming — just key in your competition’s phone number and report them as harassing.

As you can see in the image above, CallCatalog uses a CAPTCHA to attempt to thwart spammers (wouldn’t that be ironic if they got spammed?).  Furthermore, I noticed that CallCatalog’s moderators have removed some external links that users put in the comments — which also discourages spam.

The site includes three blog-like pages (meaning, they get new items added periodically) related to telephone privacy: News, How To, and Videos.  Unfortunately, none of these pages offer a feed.

Optimistically, this site serves as an example of how the Internet can be used to aggregate information to empower users.  But realistically, I have to wonder how useful this information can be.  Most of the entries I perused were along the lines of “Who are these people?  Make it stop!”  Will finding out that you’re just one of ten thousand people whom a particular caller is hounding help you to take action against them?  Or will you have to be satisfied with the knowledge that at least you’re not alone?

Advertisements
Advertisement




8 Responses to CallCatalog.com tries to throw the book at unwanted callers

  1. Unfortunately caller ID can be set to be anything that the caller wants it to be. Have you ever noticed that sometimes the number is all zeros?

  2. It would be useful if the callerid said blank, or unknown under name but still gave a phone number. OR if it actually gave a name but you can't make it out. I've gotten a name of "sales" before and a phone number.

  3. Google Voice provides some means of control, if you want it badly enough. You give the Google Voice number to anybody you think might "spam" you with calls, and tell it to send any unknown callers straight to voicemail.

    BTW – there *is* an alternative to e-mail on the horizon. Messaging in social networks like Facebook authenticates the sender. Only authorized senders get to give you messages. That's why your bank sends you messages in an internal messaging app rather than just sending SMTP e-mail. The next required element is portable social network authentication credentials, like OpenID. Once these are widely accepted and managed, you'll be able to securely authenticate message senders across networks.

    This same thing will be able to be applied to voice transmissions, like the telephone, particularly once SIP is widely established and we can finally get away from the all-digit phone "number".

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.