Just in case you were wondering.
Yes, we definitely have beachfront property.
Thanks to xkcd for this amazing updated Online Communities map! Stare at it, share it, enjoy it!
[Via Buzzfeed]
[Via]
Admire as Mother Nature does her magic with what is called the “natural selection” process.
[Via]
Hacking an electronic voting system is illegal, undemocratic, deeply irresponsible, and an affront to everyone who ever fought against tyranny. But done the right way, it can also be funny.
A web-based voting system, designed for District of Columbia voters to cast their ballot from overseas, has been suspended after students at the University of Michigan altered the system to play a song every time somebody cast a vote. (The song in question was “The Victors”, the fight song of Michigan’s sporting teams.)
It should be stressed the students were not acting criminally and were among more than a 100 people asked to test the security and given access to the source code behind the system.
The voting option would have been among the first to take advantage of the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act, a law passed last year allowing technology to be used to make it easier for people, such as serving soldiers, to vote. Voters in the DC elections will still be able to log on to a website to print out ballots and return them by e-mail, fax or regular mail.
It’s not just the musical interlude that’s caused concern among officials. Testing also showed that Mac users running Safari and viewing and completing the ballot document with Safari’s default built-in PDF viewer would likely not have their vote counted. That particular setup left the ballot document restored to its original, unedited state when the voter saved and submitted it, meaning they would unwittingly cast a blank ballot.
The DC Board of Elections and Ethics says it has ” determined, with the assistance of the public examination community, that the current iteration of the ballot return feature did not meet our security and file integrity standards for the Digital Vote by Mail pilot project.”
The big question, now, is whether or not the decision to start the public testing program on September 24 was too late for a system designed to be used for real voting on November 2.
It’s been a while since we brought you a post of geeky tattoos (or more geeky tattoos!) – so here are more of the latest plucked with love from Flickr.
The best part of this binary armband? It reads “this is a binary armband.” – mezdeathhead (CC)
Youtube user Styropyro built this cool burning laser out of parts he salvaged from an old computers. Total cost of the project: $3.55. Oh, and if you decide to build one for yourself, be sure to act responsibly and don’t go pointing this thing into people’s eyes.
[Via]
The New York Times reported a couple of days ago that for some newly released books on Amazon, the Kindle version actually costs more than the hardcover. For obvious reasons, this has not exactly been well received by their customers. Reviews for James Patterson’s new book Don’t Blink are overwhelmingly concerned with the price rather than the book itself, with a slew of one-star ratings (though one of these unhappy reviewers did note “I read the hardcopy of this and can tell the people who are boycotting the e-book because of the price, that they’re not missing anything”).
Meanwhile, Amazon is blaming the publishers (going so far as to write in italics underneath the $14.99 on the Kindle version this price was set by the publisher) and the publishers are blaming Amazon for lowering hardcover prices too drastically. Though the real victims here seem to be Kindle owners who were relying on that $9.99 price point – or maybe the authors, who now have crappy reviews of their books because of things beyond their control.
So what do you think? Is $14.99 too much for an e-book in general, or only if the hardcover happens to be $14.00? Or what about $19.99 for the Kindle version of Ken Follett’s new book Fall of the Giants? What do you think is the perfect e-book price point?
I own a Kindle, though my purchase choices on it usually have little to do with price – more like whether the book is important enough to me that I want it on my shelf, or if I’d be embarrassed to be seen reading it in public. But I do think I’d be wary about paying more than I’d pay for the hardcover.