$ kill
kill: usage: kill [-s sigspec | -n signum | -sigspec] pid | jobspec … or kill -l [sigspec]
$ /bin/kill
Usage:
kill pid … Send SIGTERM to every process listed.
kill signal pid … Send a signal to every process listed.
kill -s signal pid … Send a signal to every process listed.
kill -l List all signal names.
kill -L List all signal names in a nice table.
kill -l signal Convert between signal numbers and names.
sh-4.0$ love
sh: love: command not found
sh-4.0$ peace
sh: peace: command not found
sh-4.0$ happiness
sh: happiness: command not found
sh-4.0$ kill
kill: usage: kill [-s sigspec | -n signum | -sigspec] pid | jobspec … or kill -l [sigspec]
Seriously, I tried those commands on linux, too.
Here’s the output:
user@lx2:/# love
You didn’t tell who to love. usage: love [name]
user@lx2:/# happiness
May a lot of happiness be with you.
user@lx2:/# peace
I’ll do my very best.
user@lx2:/# kill
explorer.exe not found. So what do want to kill?
By your criteria, that $1000 “I Am Rich” iPhone app must be the ultimate program. (not criticizing the app’s author, whose artistic motivation I understand)
see Wikipedia: Gratis versus Libre
I hope you may find why Linux is truly Free and why it could not and should not exist otherwise.
And also, this kind of Free does not imply At No Cost, as many companies will corroborate.
By your criteria, that $1000 "I Am Rich" iPhone app must be the ultimate program. (not criticizing the app's author, whose artistic motivation I understand)
see Wikipedia: Gratis versus Libre
I hope you may find why Linux is truly Free and why it could not and should not exist otherwise.
And also, this kind of Free does not imply At No Cost, as many companies will corroborate.
On my linux box:
$ kill
kill: usage: kill [-s sigspec | -n signum | -sigspec] pid | jobspec … or kill -l [sigspec]
$ /bin/kill
Usage:
kill pid … Send SIGTERM to every process listed.
kill signal pid … Send a signal to every process listed.
kill -s signal pid … Send a signal to every process listed.
kill -l List all signal names.
kill -L List all signal names in a nice table.
kill -l signal Convert between signal numbers and names.
So no. Linux is not evil.
On my linux box:
$ kill
kill: usage: kill [-s sigspec | -n signum | -sigspec] pid | jobspec … or kill -l [sigspec]
$ /bin/kill
Usage:
kill pid … Send SIGTERM to every process listed.
kill signal pid … Send a signal to every process listed.
kill -s signal pid … Send a signal to every process listed.
kill -l List all signal names.
kill -L List all signal names in a nice table.
kill -l signal Convert between signal numbers and names.
So no. Linux is not evil.
You're not using sh, that's why it does not react that way :)
You’re not using sh, that’s why it does not react that way :)
It doesn't matter what shell you're using. 'kill' is a separate program. It's what's giving you back the message, not the shell.
It doesn’t matter what shell you’re using. ‘kill’ is a separate program. It’s what’s giving you back the message, not the shell.
If you compile gentoo with the offensive use flag it will say some funny stuff.
If you compile gentoo with the offensive use flag it will say some funny stuff.
This just seem a bit more optimistic thanks to command-not-found on Ubuntu.
$ love
The program 'love' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing:
sudo apt-get install love
This just seem a bit more optimistic thanks to command-not-found on Ubuntu.
$ love
The program ‘love’ is currently not installed. You can install it by typing:
sudo apt-get install love
[morgan@archlinux64 Mad Skills Motocross Demo]$ kill balmer
sh: kill: balmer: arguments must be process or job IDs
Linux is the most UNEVIL system there is.
What other OS has caters for minorities ?
I.e Welsh in KDE and linux also caters for discordianism – ddate …
[morgan@archlinux64 Mad Skills Motocross Demo]$ kill balmer
sh: kill: balmer: arguments must be process or job IDs
Linux is the most UNEVIL system there is.
What other OS has caters for minorities ?
I.e Welsh in KDE and linux also caters for discordianism – ddate …
lovely joke! haha
but I think it could be extended to Unix environment in general, right?
cheers!
lovely joke! haha
but I think it could be extended to Unix environment in general, right?
cheers!
I Lol'd.
I Lol’d.
spectacular! :D
spectacular! :D
sh-4.0$ love
sh: love: command not found
sh-4.0$ peace
sh: peace: command not found
sh-4.0$ happiness
sh: happiness: command not found
sh-4.0$ kill
kill: usage: kill [-s sigspec | -n signum | -sigspec] pid | jobspec … or kill -l [sigspec]
Oops…
sh-4.0$ love
sh: love: command not found
sh-4.0$ peace
sh: peace: command not found
sh-4.0$ happiness
sh: happiness: command not found
sh-4.0$ kill
kill: usage: kill [-s sigspec | -n signum | -sigspec] pid | jobspec … or kill -l [sigspec]
Oops…
look here :-)
Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.
C:>love
‘love’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>paase
‘paase’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>happiness
‘happiness’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>kill
‘kill’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>
look here :-)
Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.
C:>love
'love' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>paase
'paase' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>happiness
'happiness' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>kill
'kill' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>
[quote]
C:>love
‘love’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>paase
‘paase’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>happiness
‘happiness’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>kill
‘kill’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
[/quote]
i guess that makes windows “Stupid” no?
Windows will accept “break all”. :)
[quote]
C:>love
‘love’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>paase
‘paase’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>happiness
‘happiness’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
C:>kill
‘kill’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
[/quote]
i guess that makes windows "Stupid" no?
Windows will accept "break all". :)
Agreed 100% OP.
Linux is for basement dwellers and code monkeys. Just take a look at your local Linux User Group.
/thread
Agreed 100% OP.
Linux is for basement dwellers and code monkeys. Just take a look at your local Linux User Group.
/thread
Guys, this website is probably hosted by a Linux server, is it evil or not we are all on it
Guys, this website is probably hosted by a Linux server, is it evil or not we are all on it
Guys, this website is probably hosted by a Linux server, is it evil or not we are all on it
Seriously, I tried those commands on linux, too.
Here’s the output:
user@lx2:/# love
You didn’t tell who to love. usage: love [name]
user@lx2:/# happiness
May a lot of happiness be with you.
user@lx2:/# peace
I’ll do my very best.
user@lx2:/# kill
explorer.exe not found. So what do want to kill?
It seems you’re using the wrong distribution…
*lol*
Seriously, I tried those commands on linux, too.
Here's the output:
user@lx2:/# love
You didn't tell who to love. usage: love [name]
user@lx2:/# happiness
May a lot of happiness be with you.
user@lx2:/# peace
I'll do my very best.
user@lx2:/# kill
explorer.exe not found. So what do want to kill?
It seems you're using the wrong distribution…
*lol*
that’s why linux is free
>that’s why linux is free
By your criteria, that $1000 “I Am Rich” iPhone app must be the ultimate program. (not criticizing the app’s author, whose artistic motivation I understand)
see Wikipedia: Gratis versus Libre
I hope you may find why Linux is truly Free and why it could not and should not exist otherwise.
And also, this kind of Free does not imply At No Cost, as many companies will corroborate.
that's why linux is free
>that’s why linux is free
By your criteria, that $1000 "I Am Rich" iPhone app must be the ultimate program. (not criticizing the app's author, whose artistic motivation I understand)
see Wikipedia: Gratis versus Libre
I hope you may find why Linux is truly Free and why it could not and should not exist otherwise.
And also, this kind of Free does not imply At No Cost, as many companies will corroborate.
Haha.. nice
I think you guys are looking too far into it…
$ make love
error: cannot make love
kill infidel
sh: done: infidel