<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Science vs. Faith [Pic]</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Nathan Eakins</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-331649</link> <dc:creator>Nathan Eakins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 20:44:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-331649</guid> <description>This is the dumbest thing I have ever seen. First it pressumes God is imagined by man without proof to support that. Second it claims that there is evidence to contradict the Bible. Show me some. I challenge you. Third, the model for science also begins with an &quot;idea&quot;. Then, according to the model, it rejects the idea in favor of a better one, then finds something to support it, and turns it into a theory. It then uses this theory, not fact, to better understand the universe. What? And because it&#039;s just a theory, it either rejects it again or modifies it. Is science really the more logical thing to put your faith in? That makes more sense than the thing that hasn&#039;t changed since it began? Doesn&#039;t make sense to me. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the dumbest thing I have ever seen. First it pressumes God is imagined by man without proof to support that. Second it claims that there is evidence to contradict the Bible. Show me some. I challenge you.</p><p>Third, the model for science also begins with an &quot;idea&quot;. Then, according to the model, it rejects the idea in favor of a better one, then finds something to support it, and turns it into a theory.</p><p>It then uses this theory, not fact, to better understand the universe. What? And because it&#039;s just a theory, it either rejects it again or modifies it.</p><p>Is science really the more logical thing to put your faith in? That makes more sense than the thing that hasn&#039;t changed since it began? Doesn&#039;t make sense to me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rog</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-293798</link> <dc:creator>Rog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-293798</guid> <description>This is 100% correct. If you think you believe in both you don&#039;t understand either. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is 100% correct. If you think you believe in both you don&#039;t understand either.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jens Eriksson</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-288681</link> <dc:creator>Jens Eriksson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-288681</guid> <description>or even the difference between different editions of &quot;the word&quot;? not to mention the different versions used by different spring-offs? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or even the difference between different editions of &quot;the word&quot;?<br /> not to mention the different versions used by different spring-offs?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: poot</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-288680</link> <dc:creator>poot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-288680</guid> <description>Tim, sweetie-  God&#039;s word hasn&#039;t been constant.   Ever noticed the difference between the old and the new testament ?   lol </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, sweetie-  God&#039;s word hasn&#039;t been constant.   Ever noticed the difference between the old and the new testament ?   lol</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zappbrannigan420</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-288665</link> <dc:creator>Zappbrannigan420</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-288665</guid> <description>That assertion has never been proven.  There is no correlation between Horus and Jesus Christ, no where in the mythologies concerning any of the Horuses (and there are multiple Gods name Horus that existed at different times in Egyptian mythology) that corresponds to Jesus.  That view has never substantiated by an Egyptologist, by any Archaeologist, by any theologian or by anyone who as actually read Egyptian mythology.  It is a false assertion in one book that, like the vomit it is, got regurgitated in that idiotic film Zeitgeist.  Protip: actually study the things you speak of lest you be proved a fool, and that applies to science as well as religion, you know, actually read the books and mythologies before talking about them, just like you would perform the experiment before telling people the results. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That assertion has never been proven.  There is no correlation between Horus and Jesus Christ, no where in the mythologies concerning any of the Horuses (and there are multiple Gods name Horus that existed at different times in Egyptian mythology) that corresponds to Jesus.  That view has never substantiated by an Egyptologist, by any Archaeologist, by any theologian or by anyone who as actually read Egyptian mythology.  It is a false assertion in one book that, like the vomit it is, got regurgitated in that idiotic film Zeitgeist.  Protip: actually study the things you speak of lest you be proved a fool, and that applies to science as well as religion, you know, actually read the books and mythologies before talking about them, just like you would perform the experiment before telling people the results.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Graytigeress</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-288664</link> <dc:creator>Graytigeress</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-288664</guid> <description>I think the people who posted this picture are trolling. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the people who posted this picture are trolling.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SaraCVT</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-288657</link> <dc:creator>SaraCVT</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 02:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-288657</guid> <description>I have no idea what you just said.  Hopefully you can listen better than you can type (although I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d put too much stock in that movie--I saw it too, and found it to be pure drivel; mindless advertising.  Then again, you might be the target audience...) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea what you just said.  Hopefully you can listen better than you can type (although I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d put too much stock in that movie&#8211;I saw it too, and found it to be pure drivel; mindless advertising.  Then again, you might be the target audience&#8230;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Oliverkayaks</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-288655</link> <dc:creator>Oliverkayaks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-288655</guid> <description>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Ok HOW ABOUT! 1. The theory of relativaty 2. The theory of relativaty AGAIN (special one) 3. The theory of tectonic movemennt 4. the theory of evolution In fact EVERY SINGLE SCIENTIFIC THEORY </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA<br /> Ok HOW ABOUT!<br /> 1. The theory of relativaty<br /> 2. The theory of relativaty AGAIN (special one)<br /> 3. The theory of tectonic movemennt<br /> 4. the theory of evolution<br /> In fact EVERY SINGLE SCIENTIFIC THEORY</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cory Albrecht</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-288652</link> <dc:creator>Cory Albrecht</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-288652</guid> <description>So I&#039;m sure you can back up that unsupported assertion with actual, you know, *evidence*? And by evidence I mean actual instances of the scientific establishment ignoring contradicting, replicated/verified evidence and refusing to discard or modify the affected theories, and not just individual scientists acting stubborn. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#039;m sure you can back up that unsupported assertion with actual, you know, *evidence*?</p><p>And by evidence I mean actual instances of the scientific establishment ignoring contradicting, replicated/verified evidence and refusing to discard or modify the affected theories, and not just individual scientists acting stubborn.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Believing does not m</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-288646</link> <dc:creator>Believing does not m</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-288646</guid> <description>Theres alot more to feel insulted about then this. Because the basis of faith revolves around belief. And so belief would be believing insomething. Which is a state of mind of putting hope into ones existences. Because you believe it is so. Believing in god isnt necessary for existence. If you were gunna look at religion in anyway, its a way of putting boundaries on yourself without making those boundries yourself. You use god as a reason to explain your existence. In thus you dont have to think about it. Cause you already got a answer to your question. I can go on about it but oh well.. Im not a religious person. I prefer not to be called a christian for the past involvement with Christians have been tainted by death and people killing others in the name of Christianity cause they enforce there beliefs and to single minded to let the dog lie. They stick there noes in places where it does not belong creating controversy. If you ignore the people religious people killed... oh sure it looks like a holy thing. Its not. Its like how they refuse to teach some stuff to people in school cause of contriversy. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theres alot more to feel insulted about then this. Because the basis of faith revolves around belief. And so belief would be believing insomething. Which is a state of mind of putting hope into ones existences. Because you believe it is so. Believing in god isnt necessary for existence. If you were gunna look at religion in anyway, its a way of putting boundaries on yourself without making those boundries yourself. You use god as a reason to explain your existence. In thus you dont have to think about it. Cause you already got a answer to your question. I can go on about it but oh well.. Im not a religious person. I prefer not to be called a christian for the past involvement with Christians have been tainted by death and people killing others in the name of Christianity cause they enforce there beliefs and to single minded to let the dog lie. They stick there noes in places where it does not belong creating controversy. If you ignore the people religious people killed&#8230; oh sure it looks like a holy thing. Its not. Its like how they refuse to teach some stuff to people in school cause of contriversy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: FishyFrankie</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-288645</link> <dc:creator>FishyFrankie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-288645</guid> <description>this is hilairious.. people its a joke get over it </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is hilairious.. people its a joke get over it</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/07/25/science-vs-faith-pic/#comment-288644</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=28312#comment-288644</guid> <description>The only problem with science is that it&#039;s always changing and there&#039;s never just one theory to an idea, Gods word has always been constant. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with science is that it&#039;s always changing and there&#039;s never just one theory to an idea, Gods word has always been constant.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-13 19:00:52 -->
