Comments on: Featured 3D Short: A Gentlemen’s Duel http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/ tech, science, news and social issues for geeks Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:25:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Bill Hardimanhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-294563 Bill Hardiman Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:04:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-294563 love the ending! love the ending!

]]> By: billievilhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-244436 billievil Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:38:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-244436 and 3 dimensional animation has always been referred to as '3D'. Steroscopic 3D films are the lesser known form of 3D so are referred to as 'Stereo 3D'. I would assume '3D short' to be a CG animation, not stereo. and 3 dimensional animation has always been referred to as '3D'. Steroscopic 3D films are the lesser known form of 3D so are referred to as 'Stereo 3D'. I would assume '3D short' to be a CG animation, not stereo.

]]> By: billievilhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-274867 billievil Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:38:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-274867 and 3 dimensional animation has always been referred to as '3D'. Steroscopic 3D films are the lesser known form of 3D so are referred to as 'Stereo 3D'. I would assume '3D short' to be a CG animation, not stereo. and 3 dimensional animation has always been referred to as ’3D’. Steroscopic 3D films are the lesser known form of 3D so are referred to as ‘Stereo 3D’. I would assume ’3D short’ to be a CG animation, not stereo.

]]> By: Sevvyhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-243834 Sevvy Sat, 13 Mar 2010 06:10:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-243834 Traditionally, any animation that is not drawn if considered 3D. This was obviously made in a 3D modeling program. Traditionally, any animation that is not drawn if considered 3D. This was obviously made in a 3D modeling program.

]]> By: Sevvyhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-274866 Sevvy Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:10:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-274866 Traditionally, any animation that is not drawn if considered 3D. This was obviously made in a 3D modeling program. Traditionally, any animation that is not drawn if considered 3D. This was obviously made in a 3D modeling program.

]]> By: Lolhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-243698 Lol Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:11:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-243698 What do you call a 3D model then? Considering you don't see the "3D" part until you render it (If you choose to do it that way). What do you call a 3D model then? Considering you don't see the "3D" part until you render it (If you choose to do it that way).

]]> By: Lolhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-274865 Lol Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:11:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-274865 What do you call a 3D model then? Considering you don't see the "3D" part until you render it (If you choose to do it that way). What do you call a 3D model then? Considering you don’t see the “3D” part until you render it (If you choose to do it that way).

]]> By: Danielhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-243258 Daniel Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:55:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-243258 I remember watching it about 2 years ago so it's older I remember watching it about 2 years ago so it's older

]]> By: Danielhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-274864 Daniel Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:55:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-274864 I remember watching it about 2 years ago so it's older I remember watching it about 2 years ago so it’s older

]]> By: Tespadahttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-242843 Tespada Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:42:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-242843 This was pre-avatar buddy. I remember watching this months ago. This was pre-avatar buddy. I remember watching this months ago.

]]> By: Tespadahttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-274863 Tespada Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:42:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-274863 This was pre-avatar buddy. I remember watching this months ago. This was pre-avatar buddy. I remember watching this months ago.

]]> By: Word Bitchhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/03/10/featured-3d-short-a-gentlemens-duel/#comment-242693 Word Bitch Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:58:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=23286#comment-242693 While it's "3D animation," it isn't correct to refer to this as a "3D short." Unqualified "3D," especially post-Avatar, implies that it's stereoscopic, which this is not. It /is/ awesome, like all of Blur's shorts. WB While it's "3D animation," it isn't correct to refer to this as a "3D short." Unqualified "3D," especially post-Avatar, implies that it's stereoscopic, which this is not.

It /is/ awesome, like all of Blur's shorts.

WB

]]>