<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Wiggle stereoscopy: 3D without Glasses</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: mizz_eerie</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-286680</link> <dc:creator>mizz_eerie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 03:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-286680</guid> <description>pretty sure thats a scene from the kids movie Shorts.... but still pretty cool, even if it is slightly irritating lol </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty sure thats a scene from the kids movie Shorts&#8230;. but still pretty cool, even if it is slightly irritating lol</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mito</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-257235</link> <dc:creator>Mito</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-257235</guid> <description>Who made that photo? It&#039;s awesome. You need to give credit, that&#039;s somebody&#039;s art. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who made that photo? It&#039;s awesome.</p><p>You need to give credit, that&#039;s somebody&#039;s art.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mito</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-278008</link> <dc:creator>Mito</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-278008</guid> <description>Who made that photo? It&#039;s awesome.You need to give credit, that&#039;s somebody&#039;s art.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who made that photo? It&#8217;s awesome.</p><p>You need to give credit, that&#8217;s somebody&#8217;s art.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DG</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-254951</link> <dc:creator>DG</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-254951</guid> <description>@Rhiannon - could work for Paul Greengrass though... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rhiannon &#8211; could work for Paul Greengrass though&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DG</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-278007</link> <dc:creator>DG</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-278007</guid> <description>@Rhiannon - could work for Paul Greengrass though...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rhiannon &#8211; could work for Paul Greengrass though&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rhiannon</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-254944</link> <dc:creator>Rhiannon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-254944</guid> <description>The constant wiggling is annoying though. Probably why it&#039;s been rejected thus far. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The constant wiggling is annoying though. Probably why it&#039;s been rejected thus far.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rhiannon</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-278006</link> <dc:creator>Rhiannon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:24:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-278006</guid> <description>The constant wiggling is annoying though. Probably why it&#039;s been rejected thus far.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The constant wiggling is annoying though. Probably why it&#8217;s been rejected thus far.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matthew</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-254925</link> <dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-254925</guid> <description>i bet the 3DS from Nintendo is going to use something like this to make their new hand-held be in 3D with out the need for glasses and i would be very happy if they did because this looks amazing. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i bet the 3DS from Nintendo is going to use something like this to make their new hand-held be in 3D with out the need for glasses and i would be very happy if they did because this looks amazing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matthew</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-278005</link> <dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-278005</guid> <description>i bet the 3DS from Nintendo is going to use something like this to make their new hand-held be in 3D with out the need for glasses and i would be very happy if they did because this looks amazing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i bet the 3DS from Nintendo is going to use something like this to make their new hand-held be in 3D with out the need for glasses and i would be very happy if they did because this looks amazing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-227405</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-227405</guid> <description>Is this a new thing? If so, why did it take so long to realise how easy it was? If not, why wasn&#039;t the framerate amped up to beyond our persistence of vision and used instead of 3d-glasses? Or does the &quot;if not&quot; not work if the framerate is beyond our persistence of vision? Simply put, this is kinda amazing. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a new thing?</p><p>If so, why did it take so long to realise how easy it was?</p><p>If not, why wasn&#039;t the framerate amped up to beyond our persistence of vision and used instead of 3d-glasses?</p><p>Or does the &quot;if not&quot; not work if the framerate is beyond our persistence of vision?</p><p>Simply put, this is kinda amazing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-278004</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-278004</guid> <description>Is this a new thing?If so, why did it take so long to realise how easy it was?If not, why wasn&#039;t the framerate amped up to beyond our persistence of vision and used instead of 3d-glasses?Or does the &quot;if not&quot; not work if the framerate is beyond our persistence of vision?Simply put, this is kinda amazing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a new thing?</p><p>If so, why did it take so long to realise how easy it was?</p><p>If not, why wasn&#8217;t the framerate amped up to beyond our persistence of vision and used instead of 3d-glasses?</p><p>Or does the &#8220;if not&#8221; not work if the framerate is beyond our persistence of vision?</p><p>Simply put, this is kinda amazing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kunkru</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2010/02/03/wiggle-stereoscopy-3d-without-glasses/#comment-227377</link> <dc:creator>Kunkru</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=22170#comment-227377</guid> <description>This is amazing! I searched for pictures like this one and found many, but no one is good like the picture chosen on this page. I have never seen 3D without glasses in those perfection. Incredible </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is amazing!</p><p>I searched for pictures like this one and found many, but no one is good like the picture chosen on this page.</p><p>I have never seen 3D without glasses in those perfection.</p><p>Incredible</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 04:21:45 -->
