<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Science Is Sexy: How Do Vaccines Work and Are They Dangerous?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: geeksaresexy</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-363542</link> <dc:creator>geeksaresexy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:07:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-363542</guid> <description>Not really, I saw the name under the &quot;name&quot; field, and I assumed that the comment was spam. I get so many comments on this site, that if I read everything, I&#039;d be a this a few hours every day. So if it vaguely looks like spam, I nuke it. Sorry about that. Next time you want to comment, don&#039;t use a name that looks like it comes from a spam bot :) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really, I saw the name under the &quot;name&quot; field, and I assumed that the comment was spam. I get so many comments on this site, that if I read everything, I&#039;d be a this a few hours every day. So if it vaguely looks like spam, I nuke it. Sorry about that. Next time you want to comment, don&#039;t use a name that looks like it comes from a spam bot :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Smart Vaccination</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-363540</link> <dc:creator>Smart Vaccination</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:00:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-363540</guid> <description>wow.  moderated!  truth suppression!  well at least YOU read it.  even if you lack the court age to let my post stand, I&#039;d be curious to se your thoughts on what I said as a generic comment of your own.  You can make it sound like &quot;to those that believe...&quot;  I gave you a fake email because I didn&#039;t want to be on any email list if that&#039;s your reason for moderation. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow.  moderated!  truth suppression!  well at least YOU read it.  even if you lack the court age to let my post stand, I&#039;d be curious to se your thoughts on what I said as a generic comment of your own.  You can make it sound like &quot;to those that believe&#8230;&quot;  I gave you a fake email because I didn&#039;t want to be on any email list if that&#039;s your reason for moderation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trista Zeringue</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-343124</link> <dc:creator>Trista Zeringue</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:58:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-343124</guid> <description>My son has an allergy to eggs, and I asked his doctors about eggs being in the vaccine.  If an individual is not deathly allergic to eggs, then a little discomfort is better than getting a potentially deadly disease. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My son has an allergy to eggs, and I asked his doctors about eggs being in the vaccine.  If an individual is not deathly allergic to eggs, then a little discomfort is better than getting a potentially deadly disease.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Guest</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-286265</link> <dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-286265</guid> <description>When weighing risks versus benefits it is also important to note that vaccines only target a tiny percentage of the strains of a tiny percentage of the illnesses in existence, and not even the most dangerous ones.  When considered against the potential risks, the benefits do seem incredibly minimal. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When weighing risks versus benefits it is also important to note that vaccines only target a tiny percentage of the strains of a tiny percentage of the illnesses in existence, and not even the most dangerous ones.  When considered against the potential risks, the benefits do seem incredibly minimal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Max</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-285673</link> <dc:creator>Max</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-285673</guid> <description>Just to satisfy my curiosity, what are your thoughts on the efficacy of human vaccines?  I&#039;m a veterinarian and while there are many vaccines that we use that are very important in animals (rabies being the classic example), there are many more that have shown very little efficacy and yet still been certified by the FDA.  Many of these are pushed heavily for a few years and then later withdrawn when veterinarians and producers realize they have little effect.  I&#039;m sure that efficacy has been demonstrated for human vaccines with long track records but what about those that are relatively new and yet still touted whenever I walk into my pharmacy (specific examples slip my mind at the moment)? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to satisfy my curiosity, what are your thoughts on the efficacy of human vaccines?  I&#039;m a veterinarian and while there are many vaccines that we use that are very important in animals (rabies being the classic example), there are many more that have shown very little efficacy and yet still been certified by the FDA.  Many of these are pushed heavily for a few years and then later withdrawn when veterinarians and producers realize they have little effect.  I&#039;m sure that efficacy has been demonstrated for human vaccines with long track records but what about those that are relatively new and yet still touted whenever I walk into my pharmacy (specific examples slip my mind at the moment)?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glenn</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-285486</link> <dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-285486</guid> <description>On a more cautionary (and scientifically validated) note, the one thing that people really do need to be aware of, is the culture medium used in growing the vaccine. In many cases these vaccines are cultivated in an egg medium, which can trigger an allergic reaction in those people known to suffer with egg allergies. Always ask what the culture medium is, before taking the vaccine, just to check. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a more cautionary (and scientifically validated) note, the one thing that people really do need to be aware of, is the culture medium used in growing the vaccine. In many cases these vaccines are cultivated in an egg medium, which can trigger an allergic reaction in those people known to suffer with egg allergies. Always ask what the culture medium is, before taking the vaccine, just to check.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmy Rogers</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-258755</link> <dc:creator>Jimmy Rogers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-258755</guid> <description>Wow, great argument and defense of vaccine additives and preservatives.  It&#039;s still not a clear cut issue, but there is way too much misinformation out there! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great argument and defense of vaccine additives and preservatives.  It&#039;s still not a clear cut issue, but there is way too much misinformation out there!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmy Rogers</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-277701</link> <dc:creator>Jimmy Rogers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-277701</guid> <description>Wow, great argument and defense of vaccine additives and preservatives.  It&#039;s still not a clear cut issue, but there is way too much misinformation out there!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great argument and defense of vaccine additives and preservatives.  It&#8217;s still not a clear cut issue, but there is way too much misinformation out there!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jess</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-258737</link> <dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-258737</guid> <description>While I agree that the article should have addressed these issues, as these are the sorts of things that many anti-vaccination advocates are concerned about, it is also extremely insensitive to attempt to make parents of autistic children feel somehow personally responsible with statements such as &quot;If you child has austism, it&#8217;s probably because you had him stuck.&quot;, especially when there is absolutely no scientific evidence to suggest that vaccines cause autism. Vaccines used to contain the preservative thimerosal, the active ingredient is ethylmercury (NOT methylmercury), an organic version of mercury that is quickly expelled from the body. Ethylmercury is not the same thing as mercury or methylmercury, and cannot cause heavy metal poisoning as mercury can. Even if you could somehow get mercury poisoning from a vaccine containing ethylmercury, ethylmercury was removed from all vaccines in 1997 as a precaution, and to encourage  anti-vaccination advocates that the ingredient they were so worried about is no longer contained in any vaccines. If there was a true causal link between ethylmercury in vaccines and autism, you would think its removal would dramatically decrease the rate of autism diagnosis over the years, and yet, the incidence of autism continues to rise. Regardless, 13 years later, people are still carrying on about mercury in vaccines! Squaline is a naturally ocurring substance that is produced by our own livers and is circulating through your bloodstream right now. Using data from 64 medical trials, a meta-analysis by Pellegrini, Nicolay, Lindert, Groth, and Della Cioppa (2009) revealed that the use of squaline in vaccines not only is totally safe, but also is associated with lower rates of chronic desease. As for formaldehyde? It too is a naturally-ocurring substance in all living things. In fact, the concentration of naturally-ocurring formaldehyde in our bodies (2 ppm) is higher than the concentrationlevels of formaldehyde in any vaccine. Our bodies have evolved a mechanism to keep our levels of formaldehyde in check so that they do not reach a level that is toxic to cells. So if anything, an injection is slightly diluting the level of formaldehyde in our bodies. And what of the man who started it all? Dr Andrew Wakefield, the researcher at the center of the original Lancet paper in 1998 that outlined the &quot;link&quot; between the childhood MMR vaccine and autism, has been found to be &quot;dishonest&quot;, &quot;irresponsible&quot;, and guilty of putting children through lengthy and unnecessary tests and &quot;serious professional misconduct&quot; by the UK General Medical Council. As a result, his medical license has been revoked, and The Lancet has issues a full retraction of the paper stating &quot;It has become clear that several elements of the 1998 paper by Wakefield et al. are incorrect. ... Therefore we fully retract this paper from the published record.&quot; What we know about autism is that in 90% of cases, there is a genetic contribution. It is primarily a genetic, rather than an environmental disorder. Other than the presence of thalidomide during the first 8 weeks of gestation, no rigorous sciuentific research has ever supported that any specific environmental factors including vaccines, food allergies, and mercury poisoning contribute in any way to autism. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that the article should have addressed these issues, as these are the sorts of things that many anti-vaccination advocates are concerned about, it is also extremely insensitive to attempt to make parents of autistic children feel somehow personally responsible with statements such as &quot;If you child has austism, it&rsquo;s probably because you had him stuck.&quot;, especially when there is absolutely no scientific evidence to suggest that vaccines cause autism.</p><p>Vaccines used to contain the preservative thimerosal, the active ingredient is ethylmercury (NOT methylmercury), an organic version of mercury that is quickly expelled from the body. Ethylmercury is not the same thing as mercury or methylmercury, and cannot cause heavy metal poisoning as mercury can. Even if you could somehow get mercury poisoning from a vaccine containing ethylmercury, ethylmercury was removed from all vaccines in 1997 as a precaution, and to encourage  anti-vaccination advocates that the ingredient they were so worried about is no longer contained in any vaccines. If there was a true causal link between ethylmercury in vaccines and autism, you would think its removal would dramatically decrease the rate of autism diagnosis over the years, and yet, the incidence of autism continues to rise. Regardless, 13 years later, people are still carrying on about mercury in vaccines!</p><p>Squaline is a naturally ocurring substance that is produced by our own livers and is circulating through your bloodstream right now. Using data from 64 medical trials, a meta-analysis by Pellegrini, Nicolay, Lindert, Groth, and Della Cioppa (2009) revealed that the use of squaline in vaccines not only is totally safe, but also is associated with lower rates of chronic desease.</p><p>As for formaldehyde? It too is a naturally-ocurring substance in all living things. In fact, the concentration of naturally-ocurring formaldehyde in our bodies (2 ppm) is higher than the concentrationlevels of formaldehyde in any vaccine. Our bodies have evolved a mechanism to keep our levels of formaldehyde in check so that they do not reach a level that is toxic to cells. So if anything, an injection is slightly diluting the level of formaldehyde in our bodies.</p><p>And what of the man who started it all? Dr Andrew Wakefield, the researcher at the center of the original Lancet paper in 1998 that outlined the &quot;link&quot; between the childhood MMR vaccine and autism, has been found to be &quot;dishonest&quot;, &quot;irresponsible&quot;, and guilty of putting children through lengthy and unnecessary tests and &quot;serious professional misconduct&quot; by the UK General Medical Council. As a result, his medical license has been revoked, and The Lancet has issues a full retraction of the paper stating &quot;It has become clear that several elements of the 1998 paper by Wakefield et al. are incorrect. &#8230; Therefore we fully retract this paper from the published record.&quot;</p><p>What we know about autism is that in 90% of cases, there is a genetic contribution. It is primarily a genetic, rather than an environmental disorder. Other than the presence of thalidomide during the first 8 weeks of gestation, no rigorous sciuentific research has ever supported that any specific environmental factors including vaccines, food allergies, and mercury poisoning contribute in any way to autism.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jess</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-277700</link> <dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-277700</guid> <description>While I agree that the article should have addressed these issues, as these are the sorts of things that many anti-vaccination advocates are concerned about, it is also extremely insensitive to attempt to make parents of autistic children feel somehow personally responsible with statements such as &quot;If you child has austism, it’s probably because you had him stuck.&quot;, especially when there is absolutely no scientific evidence to suggest that vaccines cause autism.Vaccines used to contain the preservative thimerosal, the active ingredient is ethylmercury (NOT methylmercury), an organic version of mercury that is quickly expelled from the body. Ethylmercury is not the same thing as mercury or methylmercury, and cannot cause heavy metal poisoning as mercury can. Even if you could somehow get mercury poisoning from a vaccine containing ethylmercury, ethylmercury was removed from all vaccines in 1997 as a precaution, and to encourage  anti-vaccination advocates that the ingredient they were so worried about is no longer contained in any vaccines. If there was a true causal link between ethylmercury in vaccines and autism, you would think its removal would dramatically decrease the rate of autism diagnosis over the years, and yet, the incidence of autism continues to rise. Regardless, 13 years later, people are still carrying on about mercury in vaccines!Squaline is a naturally ocurring substance that is produced by our own livers and is circulating through your bloodstream right now. Using data from 64 medical trials, a meta-analysis by Pellegrini, Nicolay, Lindert, Groth, and Della Cioppa (2009) revealed that the use of squaline in vaccines not only is totally safe, but also is associated with lower rates of chronic desease.As for formaldehyde? It too is a naturally-ocurring substance in all living things. In fact, the concentration of naturally-ocurring formaldehyde in our bodies (2 ppm) is higher than the concentrationlevels of formaldehyde in any vaccine. Our bodies have evolved a mechanism to keep our levels of formaldehyde in check so that they do not reach a level that is toxic to cells. So if anything, an injection is slightly diluting the level of formaldehyde in our bodies.And what of the man who started it all? Dr Andrew Wakefield, the researcher at the center of the original Lancet paper in 1998 that outlined the &quot;link&quot; between the childhood MMR vaccine and autism, has been found to be &quot;dishonest&quot;, &quot;irresponsible&quot;, and guilty of putting children through lengthy and unnecessary tests and &quot;serious professional misconduct&quot; by the UK General Medical Council. As a result, his medical license has been revoked, and The Lancet has issues a full retraction of the paper stating &quot;It has become clear that several elements of the 1998 paper by Wakefield et al. are incorrect. ... Therefore we fully retract this paper from the published record.&quot;What we know about autism is that in 90% of cases, there is a genetic contribution. It is primarily a genetic, rather than an environmental disorder. Other than the presence of thalidomide during the first 8 weeks of gestation, no rigorous sciuentific research has ever supported that any specific environmental factors including vaccines, food allergies, and mercury poisoning contribute in any way to autism.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that the article should have addressed these issues, as these are the sorts of things that many anti-vaccination advocates are concerned about, it is also extremely insensitive to attempt to make parents of autistic children feel somehow personally responsible with statements such as &#8220;If you child has austism, it’s probably because you had him stuck.&#8221;, especially when there is absolutely no scientific evidence to suggest that vaccines cause autism.</p><p>Vaccines used to contain the preservative thimerosal, the active ingredient is ethylmercury (NOT methylmercury), an organic version of mercury that is quickly expelled from the body. Ethylmercury is not the same thing as mercury or methylmercury, and cannot cause heavy metal poisoning as mercury can. Even if you could somehow get mercury poisoning from a vaccine containing ethylmercury, ethylmercury was removed from all vaccines in 1997 as a precaution, and to encourage  anti-vaccination advocates that the ingredient they were so worried about is no longer contained in any vaccines. If there was a true causal link between ethylmercury in vaccines and autism, you would think its removal would dramatically decrease the rate of autism diagnosis over the years, and yet, the incidence of autism continues to rise. Regardless, 13 years later, people are still carrying on about mercury in vaccines!</p><p>Squaline is a naturally ocurring substance that is produced by our own livers and is circulating through your bloodstream right now. Using data from 64 medical trials, a meta-analysis by Pellegrini, Nicolay, Lindert, Groth, and Della Cioppa (2009) revealed that the use of squaline in vaccines not only is totally safe, but also is associated with lower rates of chronic desease.</p><p>As for formaldehyde? It too is a naturally-ocurring substance in all living things. In fact, the concentration of naturally-ocurring formaldehyde in our bodies (2 ppm) is higher than the concentrationlevels of formaldehyde in any vaccine. Our bodies have evolved a mechanism to keep our levels of formaldehyde in check so that they do not reach a level that is toxic to cells. So if anything, an injection is slightly diluting the level of formaldehyde in our bodies.</p><p>And what of the man who started it all? Dr Andrew Wakefield, the researcher at the center of the original Lancet paper in 1998 that outlined the &#8220;link&#8221; between the childhood MMR vaccine and autism, has been found to be &#8220;dishonest&#8221;, &#8220;irresponsible&#8221;, and guilty of putting children through lengthy and unnecessary tests and &#8220;serious professional misconduct&#8221; by the UK General Medical Council. As a result, his medical license has been revoked, and The Lancet has issues a full retraction of the paper stating &#8220;It has become clear that several elements of the 1998 paper by Wakefield et al. are incorrect. &#8230; Therefore we fully retract this paper from the published record.&#8221;</p><p>What we know about autism is that in 90% of cases, there is a genetic contribution. It is primarily a genetic, rather than an environmental disorder. Other than the presence of thalidomide during the first 8 weeks of gestation, no rigorous sciuentific research has ever supported that any specific environmental factors including vaccines, food allergies, and mercury poisoning contribute in any way to autism.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lord_Devi</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-256406</link> <dc:creator>Lord_Devi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-256406</guid> <description>Vaccines are not dangerous because of the viruses inside of them. They are dangerous because of the methylmercury, squaline, and the formaldehyde in them. You&#039;re article has completely missed the risk involved. If it wasn&#039;t for these three ingredients, then vaccinations would be perfectly safe. As it stands now, these three ingredients can cause all sorts of nerological disorders. Namely in children. If you child has austism, it&#039;s probably because you had him stuck. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vaccines are not dangerous because of the viruses inside of them. They are dangerous because of the methylmercury, squaline, and the formaldehyde in them. You&#039;re article has completely missed the risk involved. If it wasn&#039;t for these three ingredients, then vaccinations would be perfectly safe. As it stands now, these three ingredients can cause all sorts of nerological disorders. Namely in children. If you child has austism, it&#039;s probably because you had him stuck.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lord_Devi</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/10/27/science-is-sexy-how-do-vaccines-work-and-are-they-dangerous/#comment-277699</link> <dc:creator>Lord_Devi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=18964#comment-277699</guid> <description>Vaccines are not dangerous because of the viruses inside of them. They are dangerous because of the methylmercury, squaline, and the formaldehyde in them. You&#039;re article has completely missed the risk involved. If it wasn&#039;t for these three ingredients, then vaccinations would be perfectly safe. As it stands now, these three ingredients can cause all sorts of nerological disorders. Namely in children. If you child has austism, it&#039;s probably because you had him stuck.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vaccines are not dangerous because of the viruses inside of them. They are dangerous because of the methylmercury, squaline, and the formaldehyde in them. You&#8217;re article has completely missed the risk involved. If it wasn&#8217;t for these three ingredients, then vaccinations would be perfectly safe. As it stands now, these three ingredients can cause all sorts of nerological disorders. Namely in children. If you child has austism, it&#8217;s probably because you had him stuck.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 06:17:50 -->
