<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Opera Strives for a Bigger Chuck of the American Market</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: martin</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/#comment-192384</link> <dc:creator>martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:32:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17646#comment-192384</guid> <description>in addition to the above comments, Mouse gestures are brilliant and intuitive (now can&#039;t use IE or FF anymore, I&#039;m so used to them) and the mail client is pretty awesome in the way mails are indexed and searchable. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in addition to the above comments, Mouse gestures are brilliant and intuitive (now can&#039;t use IE or FF anymore, I&#039;m so used to them)</p><p>and</p><p>the mail client is pretty awesome in the way mails are indexed and searchable.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/#comment-192297</link> <dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:21:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17646#comment-192297</guid> <description>I&#039;ve used portable Opera for USB on and off for the last year, and really appreciate how quickly it loads Google Maps versus Firefox (which lags and frequently doesn&#039;t load all of the map) and that it doesn&#039;t seem to take as much memory. My wife has tried it, but it seems to have issues with attachments for Yahoo mail. Unfortunately, we get stuck in a Firefox and Google rut, and forget all of the browsers and search engines available. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve used portable Opera for USB on and off for the last year, and really appreciate how quickly it loads Google Maps versus Firefox (which lags and frequently doesn&#039;t load all of the map) and that it doesn&#039;t seem to take as much memory.</p><p>My wife has tried it, but it seems to have issues with attachments for Yahoo mail.</p><p>Unfortunately, we get stuck in a Firefox and Google rut, and forget all of the browsers and search engines available.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sampi</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/#comment-191936</link> <dc:creator>Sampi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 07:08:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17646#comment-191936</guid> <description>I&#039;m a Firefox guy and I have a friend who uses Opera and we sometimes have debates as to which one is better. Like a lot of people pointed out, Opera is great for Mobile devices. It&#039;s also full of features. Some(me) would say a little too many things get packaged in there. For me, FF just represents the open source movement and it really is a good browser. That&#039;s why I use it. I&#039;m not an annoying anti-Microsoft guy but IE6 was a really bad browser. Now that they catched up, it&#039;s decent but I still prefer others. Chrome just got in the spotlight because its made by Google. If Google made a toothpaste, it would give Colgate a run for their money ;-) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m a Firefox guy and I have a friend who uses Opera and we sometimes have debates as to which one is better.</p><p>Like a lot of people pointed out, Opera is great for Mobile devices. It&#039;s also full of features. Some(me) would say a little too many things get packaged in there.</p><p>For me, FF just represents the open source movement and it really is a good browser. That&#039;s why I use it.</p><p>I&#039;m not an annoying anti-Microsoft guy but IE6 was a really bad browser. Now that they catched up, it&#039;s decent but I still prefer others.</p><p>Chrome just got in the spotlight because its made by Google. If Google made a toothpaste, it would give Colgate a run for their money ;-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hearo</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/#comment-191892</link> <dc:creator>Hearo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:33:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17646#comment-191892</guid> <description>I use Opera for more than 5 years now and cannot think of using any other browser. Contra Opera I hear from friends: No Adblock plus (yet blocking of contents and personal CSS-files which of course can block contents), Closed Source, no proper proxy-handling, bad add-on-functions. But who needs add ons: pros: needs less ram than ff or ie, mouse gestures (you can surf completely without clicking buttons), easy to use and customizable search function (&quot;g geeks&quot; looks at google for geeks, w geek at wikipedia. and because it&#039;s easy customizable &quot;ga geeks&quot; looks for geeks at google but excludes all advertisement-pages, l geek looks at a dictionary for geeks...), customizable gui (you can put everything everywhere and even create own buttons), great full-screen usability (yes, you &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; make it better than just showing a page full screen... limit sites to screen width, included notepad, irc-, bt-, rss- and mail-client, fast access to bookmarks (cx loads the page of my local cinema), instead of a starting page you can install a speed dial page with your preferred pages (thumbnails updated periodically or static, easy to access while surfing with strg+1-9), spell checking while writing messages..... An optional proxy that delivers the images of sites compressed (for slow internet connections) ... (there in fact is more) Opera is just great. Just give Opera one or two weeks and you&#039;ll love it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Opera for more than 5 years now and cannot think of using any other browser.</p><p>Contra Opera I hear from friends:</p><p>No Adblock plus (yet blocking of contents and personal CSS-files which of course can block contents),</p><p>Closed Source,</p><p>no proper proxy-handling,</p><p>bad add-on-functions. But who needs add ons:</p><p>pros:</p><p>needs less ram than ff or ie,</p><p>mouse gestures (you can surf completely without clicking buttons),</p><p>easy to use and customizable search function (&quot;g geeks&quot; looks at google for geeks, w geek at wikipedia. and because it&#039;s easy customizable &quot;ga geeks&quot; looks for geeks at google but excludes all advertisement-pages, l geek looks at a dictionary for geeks&#8230;),</p><p>customizable gui (you can put everything everywhere and even create own buttons),</p><p>great full-screen usability (yes, you <i>can</i> make it better than just showing a page full screen&#8230;</p><p>limit sites to screen width,</p><p>included notepad, irc-, bt-, rss- and mail-client,</p><p>fast access to bookmarks (cx loads the page of my local cinema),</p><p>instead of a starting page you can install a speed dial page with your preferred pages (thumbnails updated periodically or static, easy to access while surfing with strg+1-9),</p><p>spell checking while writing messages&#8230;..</p><p>An optional proxy that delivers the images of sites compressed (for slow internet connections)</p><p>&#8230; (there in fact is more)</p><p>Opera is just great. Just give Opera one or two weeks and you&#039;ll love it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JV</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/#comment-191819</link> <dc:creator>JV</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:33:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17646#comment-191819</guid> <description>I just switched to Opera on the Mac recently, just shortly after Opera 10 launched. I&#039;ve been a great fan of Firefox&#039;s add-ons but not a great fan of it&#039;s memory usage. Opera on the other hand doesn&#039;t have the same extensibility as Firefox does, but manages to have a lot of features that I use over at firefox. Among the things available at Opera 10 that I like the most are: DragonFly - counterpart to Firefox&#039;s Firebug. It&#039;s built in nicely into Opera 10 Remappable shortcut keys - you can download a scheme that maps Opera shortcuts so that it&#039;s similar to emacs Good download manager - from time to time, I even use it to download torrents What I miss from using firefox: Delicious plug-in - In opera, you can add a button/shortcut to access your delicious bookmarks, but it doesn&#039;t feel as &#039;native&#039; as delicious over at firefox Rendering - Forms, etc doesn&#039;t always mix with the Mac&#039;s L&amp;F Adblock Plus - There&#039;s a simple pop-up blocker. I&#039;ve read it can block some ads as well, though never really gotten to make work as good as adblock plus. Usability wise, I still prefer Firefox. If only it weren&#039;t such a memory hog. Awaiting Google Chrome (final) on the Mac. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just switched to Opera on the Mac recently, just shortly after Opera 10 launched. I&#039;ve been a great fan of Firefox&#039;s add-ons but not a great fan of it&#039;s memory usage. Opera on the other hand doesn&#039;t have the same extensibility as Firefox does, but manages to have a lot of features that I use over at firefox. Among the things available at Opera 10 that I like the most are:</p><p>DragonFly &#8211; counterpart to Firefox&#039;s Firebug. It&#039;s built in nicely into Opera 10</p><p>Remappable shortcut keys &#8211; you can download a scheme that maps Opera shortcuts so that it&#039;s similar to emacs</p><p>Good download manager &#8211; from time to time, I even use it to download torrents</p><p>What I miss from using firefox:</p><p>Delicious plug-in &#8211; In opera, you can add a button/shortcut to access your delicious bookmarks, but it doesn&#039;t feel as &#039;native&#039; as delicious over at firefox</p><p>Rendering &#8211; Forms, etc doesn&#039;t always mix with the Mac&#039;s L&amp;F</p><p>Adblock Plus &#8211; There&#039;s a simple pop-up blocker. I&#039;ve read it can block some ads as well, though never really gotten to make work as good as adblock plus.</p><p>Usability wise, I still prefer Firefox. If only it weren&#039;t such a memory hog. Awaiting Google Chrome (final) on the Mac.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Natania</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/#comment-191803</link> <dc:creator>Natania</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:39:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17646#comment-191803</guid> <description>I love the metaphor... lol. Yeah, I think you hit it right on the head! Great comments, all. Thanks! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the metaphor&#8230; lol. Yeah, I think you hit it right on the head! Great comments, all. Thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zerp</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/#comment-191772</link> <dc:creator>Zerp</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:34:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17646#comment-191772</guid> <description>I use Opera a fair amount. It doesn&#039;t get along with my adblocker, or I&#039;d use it more. I mostly use Chrome right now. I like FF, but the add-ons to make it more functional really add to the memory usage, and on my current computer, that&#039;s a problem. Once i upgrade (a few weeks away), FF will once again become my primary browser, followed by Opera/Chrome (well, that&#039;s the plan, anyway), at least until I find an adblocker the works with Opera better. As for the reason Opera seems left behind in the US, my guess is that most people are familiar with IE and FF and see no reason change and take the time to learn to use a new browser as effectively as they use their current one. Almost everybody knows about IE and FF already, and there&#039;s been a lot of talk online about the fairly new Chrome, but Opera is often left out of these discussions. Many people simply don&#039;t know about it. And sadly, once they do, there&#039;s nothing really big to encourage a switch. To compare these to cars, IE would be a Ford Taurus; it&#039;s been around for a while, it gets the job done, but the only people that still use it are the ones that really know it and don&#039;t want to use something new. FF would be a Honda Civic; starts pretty boring, but you can tune it any way you want with aftermarket parts.It is, in essence a Toyota Corolla. Chrome is like a Prius; new ideas and technology, and an increasingly trendy pick for its efficiency. Opera, sadly, is any minivan; it&#039;ll get you from A to B, do it safely, reliably, and fairly efficiently, but they only time it stands out is when somebody is pointing and laughing because you didn&#039;t get something trendier or sportier. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Opera a fair amount. It doesn&#039;t get along with my adblocker, or I&#039;d use it more. I mostly use Chrome right now. I like FF, but the add-ons to make it more functional really add to the memory usage, and on my current computer, that&#039;s a problem. Once i upgrade (a few weeks away), FF will once again become my primary browser, followed by Opera/Chrome (well, that&#039;s the plan, anyway), at least until I find an adblocker the works with Opera better.</p><p>As for the reason Opera seems left behind in the US, my guess is that most people are familiar with IE and FF and see no reason change and take the time to learn to use a new browser as effectively as they use their current one. Almost everybody knows about IE and FF already, and there&#039;s been a lot of talk online about the fairly new Chrome, but Opera is often left out of these discussions. Many people simply don&#039;t know about it. And sadly, once they do, there&#039;s nothing really big to encourage a switch. To compare these to cars, IE would be a Ford Taurus; it&#039;s been around for a while, it gets the job done, but the only people that still use it are the ones that really know it and don&#039;t want to use something new. FF would be a Honda Civic; starts pretty boring, but you can tune it any way you want with aftermarket parts.It is, in essence a Toyota Corolla. Chrome is like a Prius; new ideas and technology, and an increasingly trendy pick for its efficiency. Opera, sadly, is any minivan; it&#039;ll get you from A to B, do it safely, reliably, and fairly efficiently, but they only time it stands out is when somebody is pointing and laughing because you didn&#039;t get something trendier or sportier.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Simon</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/#comment-191749</link> <dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:56:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17646#comment-191749</guid> <description>Opera Mini 5, currently in beta for modern touchscreen phones is brilliant. I have it on my Nokia N97 and it&#039;s far far superior to the built-in browser. Very quick loading desktop style pages, nice touch &quot;finger friendly&quot; interface. It&#039;s definitely worth a try if you&#039;ve got a device it&#039;ll work on. Installation was easy from m.opera.com/next As for their desktop version, meh. I don&#039;t like it. Also very much a Firefox guy. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera Mini 5, currently in beta for modern touchscreen phones is brilliant. I have it on my Nokia N97 and it&#039;s far far superior to the built-in browser. Very quick loading desktop style pages, nice touch &quot;finger friendly&quot; interface. It&#039;s definitely worth a try if you&#039;ve got a device it&#039;ll work on. Installation was easy from m.opera.com/next</p><p>As for their desktop version, meh. I don&#039;t like it. Also very much a Firefox guy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: engineer27</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/#comment-191734</link> <dc:creator>engineer27</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:40:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17646#comment-191734</guid> <description>I have been using the PalmOS microbrowser from Opera. Setup was a pain because I had to track down and locate an obsolete run-time kernel, install it on my Tungsten-C, and hope it didn&#039;t crash the entire Palm. However, once I got it working I found it to be the best handheld web browser I have seen (it beats the Berry browser hands-down). Performance on my Wi-Fi only device is acceptable, and even advanced pages with CSS render well. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using the PalmOS microbrowser from Opera. Setup was a pain because I had to track down and locate an obsolete run-time kernel, install it on my Tungsten-C, and hope it didn&#039;t crash the entire Palm.</p><p>However, once I got it working I found it to be the best handheld web browser I have seen (it beats the Berry browser hands-down). Performance on my Wi-Fi only device is acceptable, and even advanced pages with CSS render well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Terry</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/#comment-191724</link> <dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:13:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17646#comment-191724</guid> <description>Forgot to add a URL for the speed test &lt;a href=&quot;http://lifehacker.com/5352195/browser-speed-tests-chrome-40-and-opera-10-take-on-all-challengers&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://lifehacker.com/5352195/browser-speed-tests...&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to add a URL for the speed test</p><p> <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5352195/browser-speed-tests-chrome-40-and-opera-10-take-on-all-challengers" rel="nofollow">http://lifehacker.com/5352195/browser-speed-tests&#8230;</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Terry</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/18/opera-strives-for-a-bigger-chuck-of-the-american-market/#comment-191722</link> <dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:12:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17646#comment-191722</guid> <description>I have been using Opera since 2000 (I think it was the first browser to use tabs and mouse gestures). While I agree that it doesn&#039;t blow away any other browser, it does have its advantages. It is less glitchy than IE or FF, while still maintaining a high security threshold. It is faster to load and (using the Turbo) feature is the fastest for surfing. I use FF for general browsing (because of all the cool add-ons), Opera for anything secure (because I believe it to be the most secure for online business) and IE only if the site I am trying to access demands it. I never use Chrome, but have installed it on my mom&#039;s computer because of its simplicity (read - &quot;Less things to mess around with and break.&quot;) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using Opera since 2000 (I think it was the first browser to use tabs and mouse gestures). While I agree that it doesn&#039;t blow away any other browser, it does have its advantages. It is less glitchy than IE or FF, while still maintaining a high security threshold. It is faster to load and (using the Turbo) feature is the fastest for surfing.</p><p>I use FF for general browsing (because of all the cool add-ons), Opera for anything secure (because I believe it to be the most secure for online business) and IE only if the site I am trying to access demands it. I never use Chrome, but have installed it on my mom&#039;s computer because of its simplicity (read &#8211; &quot;Less things to mess around with and break.&quot;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 05:12:21 -->
