<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Process Hacker &#8211; A Powerful Windows Task Manager Alternative</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/01/process-hacker-a-windows-task-manager-alternative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/01/process-hacker-a-windows-task-manager-alternative/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Thirsten</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/01/process-hacker-a-windows-task-manager-alternative/#comment-187711</link> <dc:creator>Thirsten</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17041#comment-187711</guid> <description>I&#039;ve used Sysinternal&#039;s Process Explorer for years even after MS bought them and still will.  I like the look and the idea it can kill everything, but it comes at a price... it has to be installed on the machine first. Most times I can barely get the machine running that I&#039;m working on when I need a tool like this the most.  If Process Hacker can be made portable, I&#039;m there, but until then, I have to stay with Sysinternal&#039;s Process Explorer. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve used Sysinternal&#039;s Process Explorer for years even after MS bought them and still will.  I like the look and the idea it can kill everything, but it comes at a price&#8230; it has to be installed on the machine first.</p><p>Most times I can barely get the machine running that I&#039;m working on when I need a tool like this the most.  If Process Hacker can be made portable, I&#039;m there, but until then, I have to stay with Sysinternal&#039;s Process Explorer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thirsten</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/01/process-hacker-a-windows-task-manager-alternative/#comment-272891</link> <dc:creator>Thirsten</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17041#comment-272891</guid> <description>I&#039;ve used Sysinternal&#039;s Process Explorer for years even after MS bought them and still will.  I like the look and the idea it can kill everything, but it comes at a price... it has to be installed on the machine first.Most times I can barely get the machine running that I&#039;m working on when I need a tool like this the most.  If Process Hacker can be made portable, I&#039;m there, but until then, I have to stay with Sysinternal&#039;s Process Explorer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used Sysinternal&#8217;s Process Explorer for years even after MS bought them and still will.  I like the look and the idea it can kill everything, but it comes at a price&#8230; it has to be installed on the machine first.</p><p>Most times I can barely get the machine running that I&#8217;m working on when I need a tool like this the most.  If Process Hacker can be made portable, I&#8217;m there, but until then, I have to stay with Sysinternal&#8217;s Process Explorer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thirsten</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/01/process-hacker-a-windows-task-manager-alternative/#comment-272892</link> <dc:creator>Thirsten</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17041#comment-272892</guid> <description>I&#039;ve used Sysinternal&#039;s Process Explorer for years even after MS bought them and still will.  I like the look and the idea it can kill everything, but it comes at a price... it has to be installed on the machine first.Most times I can barely get the machine running that I&#039;m working on when I need a tool like this the most.  If Process Hacker can be made portable, I&#039;m there, but until then, I have to stay with Sysinternal&#039;s Process Explorer.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used Sysinternal&#8217;s Process Explorer for years even after MS bought them and still will.  I like the look and the idea it can kill everything, but it comes at a price&#8230; it has to be installed on the machine first.</p><p>Most times I can barely get the machine running that I&#8217;m working on when I need a tool like this the most.  If Process Hacker can be made portable, I&#8217;m there, but until then, I have to stay with Sysinternal&#8217;s Process Explorer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sampi</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/01/process-hacker-a-windows-task-manager-alternative/#comment-187453</link> <dc:creator>Sampi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17041#comment-187453</guid> <description>Free as in beer, not freedom ;) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free as in beer, not freedom ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sampi</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/01/process-hacker-a-windows-task-manager-alternative/#comment-272890</link> <dc:creator>Sampi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17041#comment-272890</guid> <description>Free as in beer, not freedom ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free as in beer, not freedom ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rod</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/01/process-hacker-a-windows-task-manager-alternative/#comment-187220</link> <dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17041#comment-187220</guid> <description>FWIW, I believe that Sysinternal&#039;s Process Explorer is also free. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I believe that Sysinternal&#039;s Process Explorer is also free.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rod</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/09/01/process-hacker-a-windows-task-manager-alternative/#comment-272889</link> <dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=17041#comment-272889</guid> <description>FWIW, I believe that Sysinternal&#039;s Process Explorer is also free.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I believe that Sysinternal&#8217;s Process Explorer is also free.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 05:39:36 -->
