<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Technology Motivator: One Gigabyte</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:25:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Erika &#352;ehić-</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-285107</link> <dc:creator>Erika &#352;ehić-</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 02:22:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-285107</guid> <description>lol xD </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol xD</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ensignmerlin</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-285085</link> <dc:creator>Ensignmerlin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-285085</guid> <description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000296ZE/o/qid=969111848/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000296ZE...&lt;/a&gt; Link related. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000296ZE/o/qid=969111848/" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000296ZE&#8230;</a><br /> Link related.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob Deloyd</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-185862</link> <dc:creator>Bob Deloyd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-185862</guid> <description>I don&#039;t even want to discuss how old this makes me feel!!! I was in an IBM shop at Mattel Toys that had a wall of IBM 3330s and an IBM 370/155 mainframe </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t even want to discuss how old this makes me feel!!!</p><p>I was in an IBM shop at Mattel Toys that had a wall of IBM 3330s and an IBM 370/155 mainframe</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bob Deloyd</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-272855</link> <dc:creator>Bob Deloyd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-272855</guid> <description>I don&#039;t even want to discuss how old this makes me feel!!! I was in an IBM shop at Mattel Toys that had a wall of IBM 3330s and an IBM 370/155 mainframe</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t even want to discuss how old this makes me feel!!!<br /> I was in an IBM shop at Mattel Toys that had a wall of IBM 3330s and an IBM 370/155 mainframe</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gray Gaffer</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-185389</link> <dc:creator>Gray Gaffer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-185389</guid> <description>Could have used a Micro-SD card for 4x the effect. In the 60&#039;s I worked for a computer company in the UK. I worked on &quot;conventional&quot; computers - 12&#039; x 6&#039; cabinets, many thousands of transistors, 48KW core RAM, and large 9 track tape drives. In the next bay over was an experimental &quot;solid state&quot; version, a cube about 18&quot; on a side. The standing joke was that some day the computer would fit inside the plug we used to connect it to the tape drives. So, half right - we didn&#039;t consider that the storage technology would also shrink. I am playing around with a powerful Linux system at home these days. 600 MHz ARM, 256MB RAM, 256MB Flash, Bluetooth, 802.11g, micro-SD card slot, camera interface, touch-screen LCD interface, USB master hub, USB slave/master &quot;on the go&quot; hub, USB serial port (boot console). It is the size of a stick of gum. I kid you not. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could have used a Micro-SD card for 4x the effect.</p><p>In the 60&#039;s I worked for a computer company in the UK. I worked on &quot;conventional&quot; computers &#8211; 12&#039; x 6&#039; cabinets, many thousands of transistors, 48KW core RAM, and large 9 track tape drives. In the next bay over was an experimental &quot;solid state&quot; version, a cube about 18&quot; on a side. The standing joke was that some day the computer would fit inside the plug we used to connect it to the tape drives. So, half right &#8211; we didn&#039;t consider that the storage technology would also shrink.</p><p>I am playing around with a powerful Linux system at home these days. 600 MHz ARM, 256MB RAM, 256MB Flash, Bluetooth, 802.11g, micro-SD card slot, camera interface, touch-screen LCD interface, USB master hub, USB slave/master &quot;on the go&quot; hub, USB serial port (boot console). It is the size of a stick of gum. I kid you not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gray Gaffer</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-272854</link> <dc:creator>Gray Gaffer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-272854</guid> <description>Could have used a Micro-SD card for 4x the effect.In the 60&#039;s I worked for a computer company in the UK. I worked on &quot;conventional&quot; computers - 12&#039; x 6&#039; cabinets, many thousands of transistors, 48KW core RAM, and large 9 track tape drives. In the next bay over was an experimental &quot;solid state&quot; version, a cube about 18&quot; on a side. The standing joke was that some day the computer would fit inside the plug we used to connect it to the tape drives. So, half right - we didn&#039;t consider that the storage technology would also shrink.I am playing around with a powerful Linux system at home these days. 600 MHz ARM, 256MB RAM, 256MB Flash, Bluetooth, 802.11g, micro-SD card slot, camera interface, touch-screen LCD interface, USB master hub, USB slave/master &quot;on the go&quot; hub, USB serial port (boot console). It is the size of a stick of gum. I kid you not.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could have used a Micro-SD card for 4x the effect.</p><p>In the 60&#8242;s I worked for a computer company in the UK. I worked on &#8220;conventional&#8221; computers &#8211; 12&#8242; x 6&#8242; cabinets, many thousands of transistors, 48KW core RAM, and large 9 track tape drives. In the next bay over was an experimental &#8220;solid state&#8221; version, a cube about 18&#8243; on a side. The standing joke was that some day the computer would fit inside the plug we used to connect it to the tape drives. So, half right &#8211; we didn&#8217;t consider that the storage technology would also shrink.</p><p>I am playing around with a powerful Linux system at home these days. 600 MHz ARM, 256MB RAM, 256MB Flash, Bluetooth, 802.11g, micro-SD card slot, camera interface, touch-screen LCD interface, USB master hub, USB slave/master &#8220;on the go&#8221; hub, USB serial port (boot console). It is the size of a stick of gum. I kid you not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: OldGeek</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-272853</link> <dc:creator>OldGeek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-272853</guid> <description>I remember them coming out. . The drive unit on is an IBM 3380, which first shipped in the early &#039;80s and was about 2.5Gb when first shipped. Note it has two head assemblies on the same set of platters. There&#039;s a better picture at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tietokonemuseo.saunalahti.fi/eng/ibm_3380_eng.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tietokonemuseo.saunalahti.fi/eng/ibm_3...&lt;/a&gt; and IBM has pictures showing how much datacenter space those units took up (2 per cabinet), plus the history of it, at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/storage/storage_3380.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/storag...&lt;/a&gt; in which you see that unit, in September 1987, had just shy of 4GB (though there was a &quot;cheap model&quot; available with reduced storage, around 1.25 GB) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember them coming out. .</p><p>The drive unit on is an IBM 3380, which first shipped in the early &#039;80s and was about 2.5Gb when first shipped. Note it has two head assemblies on the same set of platters. There&#039;s a better picture at</p><p> <a href="http://www.tietokonemuseo.saunalahti.fi/eng/ibm_3380_eng.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.tietokonemuseo.saunalahti.fi/eng/ibm_3&#8230;</a></p><p>and IBM has pictures showing how much datacenter space those units took up (2 per cabinet), plus the history of it, at</p><p> <a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/storage/storage_3380.html" rel="nofollow">http://www-03.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/storag&#8230;</a></p><p>in which you see that unit, in September 1987, had just shy of 4GB (though there was a &quot;cheap model&quot; available with reduced storage, around 1.25 GB)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sampi</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-185162</link> <dc:creator>Sampi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-185162</guid> <description>I wonder if we&#039;re gonna have 100TB SDs in twenty years, what do you think? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if we&#039;re gonna have 100TB SDs in twenty years, what do you think?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sampi</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-272852</link> <dc:creator>Sampi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-272852</guid> <description>I wonder if we&#039;re gonna have 100TB SDs in twenty years, what do you think?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if we&#8217;re gonna have 100TB SDs in twenty years, what do you think?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geeks are Sexy</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-185137</link> <dc:creator>Geeks are Sexy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-185137</guid> <description>Well, I don&#039;t go that far, but I remember having a 10 or 20 MB hard drive, and it was about twice the size of a conventional 3.5&quot; drive.... that was about... 20-22 years ago... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#039;t go that far, but I remember having a 10 or 20 MB hard drive, and it was about twice the size of a conventional 3.5&quot; drive&#8230;. that was about&#8230; 20-22 years ago&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geeks are Sexy</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-272851</link> <dc:creator>Geeks are Sexy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-272851</guid> <description>Well, I don&#039;t go that far, but I remember having a 10 or 20 MB hard drive, and it was about twice the size of a conventional 3.5&quot; drive.... that was about... 20-22 years ago...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t go that far, but I remember having a 10 or 20 MB hard drive, and it was about twice the size of a conventional 3.5&#8243; drive&#8230;. that was about&#8230; 20-22 years ago&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/08/27/technology-motivator-one-gigabyte/#comment-185110</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16929#comment-185110</guid> <description>I remember when i worked for a software company and we upgraded our &lt;em&gt;total storage&lt;/em&gt; to 1GB.  I thought we&#039;d never use all that space. And I can remember when a platter the same size as the one on the left held 5MB. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when i worked for a software company and we upgraded our <em>total storage</em> to 1GB.  I thought we&#039;d never use all that space.</p><p>And I can remember when a platter the same size as the one on the left held 5MB.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.045 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-13 21:06:00 -->
