<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: TV review: Bang Goes The Theory</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:24:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Andy Hughes</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-249920</link> <dc:creator>Andy Hughes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-249920</guid> <description>This show sucks. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show sucks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andy Hughes</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-277327</link> <dc:creator>Andy Hughes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-277327</guid> <description>This show sucks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show sucks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geeks are Sexy</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-186104</link> <dc:creator>Geeks are Sexy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-186104</guid> <description>Andrew: Try googling &quot;Bang Goes The Theory Review&quot;, you&#039;ll understand why ;) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew: Try googling &quot;Bang Goes The Theory Review&quot;, you&#039;ll understand why ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geeks are Sexy</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-272572</link> <dc:creator>Geeks are Sexy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-272572</guid> <description>Andrew: Try googling &quot;Bang Goes The Theory Review&quot;, you&#039;ll understand why ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew: Try googling &#8220;Bang Goes The Theory Review&#8221;, you&#8217;ll understand why ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-185961</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-185961</guid> <description>Why does this article keep getting dragged up a month after it was posted? No other article seems to get the same amount of comments so long after it was posted on this site. Is there some sort of smear campaign on the programme or something going on? I admit I don&#039;t like it, but it seems as if every few days, some &#039;new&#039; person is commenting on how much it sucks, which is odd compared to the other things people have complained about on this site but then fades a week or two after it was first posted. Can someone look into the IP addresses of the commenters or something? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does this article keep getting dragged up a month after it was posted?</p><p>No other article seems to get the same amount of comments so long after it was posted on this site.</p><p>Is there some sort of smear campaign on the programme or something going on?</p><p>I admit I don&#039;t like it, but it seems as if every few days, some &#039;new&#039; person is commenting on how much it sucks, which is odd compared to the other things people have complained about on this site but then fades a week or two after it was first posted.</p><p>Can someone look into the IP addresses of the commenters or something?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-272571</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-272571</guid> <description>Why does this article keep getting dragged up a month after it was posted?No other article seems to get the same amount of comments so long after it was posted on this site.Is there some sort of smear campaign on the programme or something going on?I admit I don&#039;t like it, but it seems as if every few days, some &#039;new&#039; person is commenting on how much it sucks, which is odd compared to the other things people have complained about on this site but then fades a week or two after it was first posted.Can someone look into the IP addresses of the commenters or something?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does this article keep getting dragged up a month after it was posted?</p><p>No other article seems to get the same amount of comments so long after it was posted on this site.</p><p>Is there some sort of smear campaign on the programme or something going on?</p><p>I admit I don&#8217;t like it, but it seems as if every few days, some &#8216;new&#8217; person is commenting on how much it sucks, which is odd compared to the other things people have complained about on this site but then fades a week or two after it was first posted.</p><p>Can someone look into the IP addresses of the commenters or something?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anomoly</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-185443</link> <dc:creator>Anomoly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-185443</guid> <description>it&#039;s like a UK version of Mythbusters.. just not as good </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#039;s like a UK version of Mythbusters.. just not as good</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anomoly</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-272570</link> <dc:creator>Anomoly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-272570</guid> <description>it&#039;s like a UK version of Mythbusters.. just not as good</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s like a UK version of Mythbusters.. just not as good</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scarletta</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-183914</link> <dc:creator>Scarletta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-183914</guid> <description>Poorly designed scientific experiments, wooden presenters who are very irritating and appear to be unable to communicate difficult concepts well or interestingly. A real shame. Doesn&#039;t do much to improve the view of scienc in my opinion. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poorly designed scientific experiments, wooden presenters who are very irritating and appear to be unable to communicate difficult concepts well or interestingly. A real shame. Doesn&#039;t do much to improve the view of scienc in my opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scarletta</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-272569</link> <dc:creator>Scarletta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-272569</guid> <description>Poorly designed scientific experiments, wooden presenters who are very irritating and appear to be unable to communicate difficult concepts well or interestingly. A real shame. Doesn&#039;t do much to improve the view of scienc in my opinion.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poorly designed scientific experiments, wooden presenters who are very irritating and appear to be unable to communicate difficult concepts well or interestingly. A real shame. Doesn&#8217;t do much to improve the view of scienc in my opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Artois</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-181357</link> <dc:creator>Artois</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-181357</guid> <description>I think some of you are too lenient about quality of the show. I was looking forward to watching the first episode, but it managed to dashed my expectations so expertly and left me feeling a bit cheated. Apart from the naming similarity to the BBT, I think this is being scheduled strategically to be just before the Gadget Show on C5. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some of you are too lenient about quality of the show. I was looking forward to watching the first episode, but it managed to dashed my expectations so expertly and left me feeling a bit cheated.</p><p>Apart from the naming similarity to the BBT, I think this is being scheduled strategically to be just before the Gadget Show on C5.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Artois</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/28/tv-review-bang-goes-the-theory/#comment-272568</link> <dc:creator>Artois</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=16086#comment-272568</guid> <description>I think some of you are too lenient about quality of the show. I was looking forward to watching the first episode, but it managed to dashed my expectations so expertly and left me feeling a bit cheated.Apart from the naming similarity to the BBT, I think this is being scheduled strategically to be just before the Gadget Show on C5.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think some of you are too lenient about quality of the show. I was looking forward to watching the first episode, but it managed to dashed my expectations so expertly and left me feeling a bit cheated.</p><p>Apart from the naming similarity to the BBT, I think this is being scheduled strategically to be just before the Gadget Show on C5.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 00:43:42 -->
