<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Browser benchmark update:  Lunascape 5.1.2</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/24/browser-benchmark-update-lunascape-5-1-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/24/browser-benchmark-update-lunascape-5-1-2/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/24/browser-benchmark-update-lunascape-5-1-2/#comment-174377</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15919#comment-174377</guid> <description>Indeed.  I am impressed with their ability to compete on performance and standards compliance, given the troubles that IE and Opera have had in that regard.  If they wrote their own JavaScript engine, they did a mighty fine job. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  I am impressed with their ability to compete on performance and standards compliance, given the troubles that IE and Opera have had in that regard.  If they wrote their own JavaScript engine, they did a mighty fine job.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/24/browser-benchmark-update-lunascape-5-1-2/#comment-277320</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15919#comment-277320</guid> <description>Indeed.  I am impressed with their ability to compete on performance and standards compliance, given the troubles that IE and Opera have had in that regard.  If they wrote their own JavaScript engine, they did a mighty fine job.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  I am impressed with their ability to compete on performance and standards compliance, given the troubles that IE and Opera have had in that regard.  If they wrote their own JavaScript engine, they did a mighty fine job.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/24/browser-benchmark-update-lunascape-5-1-2/#comment-174362</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15919#comment-174362</guid> <description>I&#039;ve been using Lunascape for a few days now and I do like it. The ability to switch engines without having to open new programs is incredibly nice. I have found that some of Lunascape&#039;s default settings are very annoying though (the default to open a new tab when you type a url address for instance), but after going through and thoroughly changing the settings its definitely a nice browser. All that being said, however, I can&#039;t live without my firefox addons and plugins. Lunascape has a lot of catching up to do in that catergory, IMHO. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been using Lunascape for a few days now and I do like it. The ability to switch engines without having to open new programs is incredibly nice. I have found that some of Lunascape&#039;s default settings are very annoying though (the default to open a new tab when you type a url address for instance), but after going through and thoroughly changing the settings its definitely a nice browser.</p><p>All that being said, however, I can&#039;t live without my firefox addons and plugins. Lunascape has a lot of catching up to do in that catergory, IMHO.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/24/browser-benchmark-update-lunascape-5-1-2/#comment-277319</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15919#comment-277319</guid> <description>I&#039;ve been using Lunascape for a few days now and I do like it. The ability to switch engines without having to open new programs is incredibly nice. I have found that some of Lunascape&#039;s default settings are very annoying though (the default to open a new tab when you type a url address for instance), but after going through and thoroughly changing the settings its definitely a nice browser.All that being said, however, I can&#039;t live without my firefox addons and plugins. Lunascape has a lot of catching up to do in that catergory, IMHO.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Lunascape for a few days now and I do like it. The ability to switch engines without having to open new programs is incredibly nice. I have found that some of Lunascape&#8217;s default settings are very annoying though (the default to open a new tab when you type a url address for instance), but after going through and thoroughly changing the settings its definitely a nice browser.</p><p>All that being said, however, I can&#8217;t live without my firefox addons and plugins. Lunascape has a lot of catching up to do in that catergory, IMHO.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 03:42:52 -->
