<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Quicker is Bing&#8217;s New Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/02/twitter-quicker-is-bings-new-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/02/twitter-quicker-is-bings-new-thing/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:46:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael the Dumb Tech Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/02/twitter-quicker-is-bings-new-thing/#comment-166051</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael the Dumb Tech Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15167#comment-166051</guid>
		<description>I am almost surprised that Google, for all its helpfulness in being the king of seraching, doesn&#039;t already have a Twitter search built-in. Granted to do it right, they&#039;d apparently have to create a whole new indexing setup to constantly surf just that one site. 
But I could see Bing leveraging this well. Twitter&#039;s known for dealing with NOW a lot better than even the search engine&#039;s, which gives it a nice leg-up on Google.
My prediction: Google will adapt, do it a little better than Bing, and Bing will go back down to the stats that MSN search was pulling. It&#039;s good to be the king.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am almost surprised that Google, for all its helpfulness in being the king of seraching, doesn&#8217;t already have a Twitter search built-in. Granted to do it right, they&#8217;d apparently have to create a whole new indexing setup to constantly surf just that one site.<br />
But I could see Bing leveraging this well. Twitter&#8217;s known for dealing with NOW a lot better than even the search engine&#8217;s, which gives it a nice leg-up on Google.<br />
My prediction: Google will adapt, do it a little better than Bing, and Bing will go back down to the stats that MSN search was pulling. It&#8217;s good to be the king.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
