<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Twitter Quicker is Bing&#8217;s New Thing</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/02/twitter-quicker-is-bings-new-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/02/twitter-quicker-is-bings-new-thing/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Michael the Dumb Tec</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/02/twitter-quicker-is-bings-new-thing/#comment-166051</link> <dc:creator>Michael the Dumb Tec</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:53:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15167#comment-166051</guid> <description>I am almost surprised that Google, for all its helpfulness in being the king of seraching, doesn&#039;t already have a Twitter search built-in. Granted to do it right, they&#039;d apparently have to create a whole new indexing setup to constantly surf just that one site. But I could see Bing leveraging this well. Twitter&#039;s known for dealing with NOW a lot better than even the search engine&#039;s, which gives it a nice leg-up on Google. My prediction: Google will adapt, do it a little better than Bing, and Bing will go back down to the stats that MSN search was pulling. It&#039;s good to be the king. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am almost surprised that Google, for all its helpfulness in being the king of seraching, doesn&#039;t already have a Twitter search built-in. Granted to do it right, they&#039;d apparently have to create a whole new indexing setup to constantly surf just that one site.</p><p>But I could see Bing leveraging this well. Twitter&#039;s known for dealing with NOW a lot better than even the search engine&#039;s, which gives it a nice leg-up on Google.</p><p>My prediction: Google will adapt, do it a little better than Bing, and Bing will go back down to the stats that MSN search was pulling. It&#039;s good to be the king.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-13 19:25:35 -->
