<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Now that Firefox 3.5 is out, let the benchmark battles begin</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-169713</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-169713</guid> <description>Where did I say that Chrome was the fastest?  There isn&#039;t one fastest browser here -- it depends on what you&#039;re doing.  Safari certainly excels in some of the more important areas (DOM, Strings). </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did I say that Chrome was the fastest?  There isn&#039;t one fastest browser here &#8212; it depends on what you&#039;re doing.  Safari certainly excels in some of the more important areas (DOM, Strings).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-272310</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-272310</guid> <description>Where did I say that Chrome was the fastest?  There isn&#039;t one fastest browser here -- it depends on what you&#039;re doing.  Safari certainly excels in some of the more important areas (DOM, Strings).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did I say that Chrome was the fastest?  There isn&#8217;t one fastest browser here &#8212; it depends on what you&#8217;re doing.  Safari certainly excels in some of the more important areas (DOM, Strings).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-169549</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-169549</guid> <description>I&#039;m confused. Looking at the graph of overall averages Safari is way ahead of everything else - yet you say Chrome is the fastest. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m confused. Looking at the graph of overall averages Safari is way ahead of everything else &#8211; yet you say Chrome is the fastest.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-272309</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-272309</guid> <description>I&#039;m confused. Looking at the graph of overall averages Safari is way ahead of everything else - yet you say Chrome is the fastest.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused. Looking at the graph of overall averages Safari is way ahead of everything else &#8211; yet you say Chrome is the fastest.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-167935</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-167935</guid> <description>Good point, Ryan.  In a quick, unscientific, ad hoc test here, I loaded all the same tabs in both, and then used Chrome&#039;s &quot;stats for nerds&quot; (about:memory) page to compare -- subtracting out the memory stats page itself, of course.  That actually shows Firefox using more shared memory than Chrome, (20MB vs 9.5MB), but Chrome using more private memory (152MB vs 144MB). </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Ryan.  In a quick, unscientific, ad hoc test here, I loaded all the same tabs in both, and then used Chrome&#039;s &quot;stats for nerds&quot; (about:memory) page to compare &#8212; subtracting out the memory stats page itself, of course.  That actually shows Firefox using more shared memory than Chrome, (20MB vs 9.5MB), but Chrome using more private memory (152MB vs 144MB).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-272308</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-272308</guid> <description>Good point, Ryan.  In a quick, unscientific, ad hoc test here, I loaded all the same tabs in both, and then used Chrome&#039;s &quot;stats for nerds&quot; (about:memory) page to compare -- subtracting out the memory stats page itself, of course.  That actually shows Firefox using more shared memory than Chrome, (20MB vs 9.5MB), but Chrome using more private memory (152MB vs 144MB).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Ryan.  In a quick, unscientific, ad hoc test here, I loaded all the same tabs in both, and then used Chrome&#8217;s &#8220;stats for nerds&#8221; (about:memory) page to compare &#8212; subtracting out the memory stats page itself, of course.  That actually shows Firefox using more shared memory than Chrome, (20MB vs 9.5MB), but Chrome using more private memory (152MB vs 144MB).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-167923</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-167923</guid> <description>Actually, 2k, you can group them back together.  Grab the loose tab &lt;em&gt;by the tab, not by the frame&lt;/em&gt; and drag it back to where it belongs. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, 2k, you can group them back together.  Grab the loose tab <em>by the tab, not by the frame</em> and drag it back to where it belongs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-272307</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-272307</guid> <description>Actually, 2k, you can group them back together.  Grab the loose tab &lt;em&gt;by the tab, not by the frame&lt;/em&gt; and drag it back to where it belongs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, 2k, you can group them back together.  Grab the loose tab <em>by the tab, not by the frame</em> and drag it back to where it belongs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan Petrich</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-167912</link> <dc:creator>Ryan Petrich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-167912</guid> <description>Also, Reply here/Reply to this comment doesn&#039;t seem to work on Safari4/Mac </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Reply here/Reply to this comment doesn&#039;t seem to work on Safari4/Mac</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan Petrich</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-272306</link> <dc:creator>Ryan Petrich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-272306</guid> <description>Also, Reply here/Reply to this comment doesn&#039;t seem to work on Safari4/Mac</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Reply here/Reply to this comment doesn&#8217;t seem to work on Safari4/Mac</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan Petrich</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-167908</link> <dc:creator>Ryan Petrich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-167908</guid> <description>Be careful, that page doesn&#039;t detail the methodology they use to calculate memory usage. If they aren&#039;t measuring correctly, they will be counting Chrome&#039;s shared memory numerous times. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful, that page doesn&#039;t detail the methodology they use to calculate memory usage. If they aren&#039;t measuring correctly, they will be counting Chrome&#039;s shared memory numerous times.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan Petrich</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/07/01/now-that-firefox-3-5-is-out-let-the-benchmark-battles-begin/#comment-272305</link> <dc:creator>Ryan Petrich</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=15155#comment-272305</guid> <description>Be careful, that page doesn&#039;t detail the methodology they use to calculate memory usage. If they aren&#039;t measuring correctly, they will be counting Chrome&#039;s shared memory numerous times.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful, that page doesn&#8217;t detail the methodology they use to calculate memory usage. If they aren&#8217;t measuring correctly, they will be counting Chrome&#8217;s shared memory numerous times.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 06:16:30 -->
