<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: $222,000 filesharing fine leaps to $1.92 million in new trial</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/19/222000-filesharing-fine-leaps-to-1-92-million-in-new-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/19/222000-filesharing-fine-leaps-to-1-92-million-in-new-trial/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Sampi</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/19/222000-filesharing-fine-leaps-to-1-92-million-in-new-trial/#comment-164237</link> <dc:creator>Sampi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=14620#comment-164237</guid> <description>I think the dangerous legal precedents that are being set in these US lawsuits is terrible. The number of songs (or files) shared should be irrelevant. They should setup a fixed fee. Making the argument that each song she &quot;stole&quot; is worth at least 480USD (considering she was sharing around 4000 like the RIAA claims) is ridiculous. How much is a song on iTunes store? How much is a discography bought on ebay divided by the number of songs? There should be a more reasonable, fixed fine for filesharing. Its like like speeding; everyone knows they shouldn&#039;t do it but they do it anyway. Prosecuting like this is ridiculous and has made everyone hate the RIAA. Going after trackers and indexers like ThePirateBay isn&#039;t gonna work either. Maybe the RIAA should concentrate on bringing the public a bigger variety of better and well payed recording artists. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the dangerous legal precedents that are being set in these US lawsuits is terrible.</p><p>The number of songs (or files) shared should be irrelevant. They should setup a fixed fee. Making the argument that each song she &quot;stole&quot; is worth at least 480USD (considering she was sharing around 4000 like the RIAA claims) is ridiculous. How much is a song on iTunes store? How much is a discography bought on ebay divided by the number of songs?</p><p>There should be a more reasonable, fixed fine for filesharing. Its like like speeding; everyone knows they shouldn&#039;t do it but they do it anyway. Prosecuting like this is ridiculous and has made everyone hate the RIAA. Going after trackers and indexers like ThePirateBay isn&#039;t gonna work either.</p><p>Maybe the RIAA should concentrate on bringing the public a bigger variety of better and well payed recording artists.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sampi</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/19/222000-filesharing-fine-leaps-to-1-92-million-in-new-trial/#comment-272136</link> <dc:creator>Sampi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=14620#comment-272136</guid> <description>I think the dangerous legal precedents that are being set in these US lawsuits is terrible. The number of songs (or files) shared should be irrelevant. They should setup a fixed fee. Making the argument that each song she &quot;stole&quot; is worth at least 480USD (considering she was sharing around 4000 like the RIAA claims) is ridiculous. How much is a song on iTunes store? How much is a discography bought on ebay divided by the number of songs?There should be a more reasonable, fixed fine for filesharing. Its like like speeding; everyone knows they shouldn&#039;t do it but they do it anyway. Prosecuting like this is ridiculous and has made everyone hate the RIAA. Going after trackers and indexers like ThePirateBay isn&#039;t gonna work either.Maybe the RIAA should concentrate on bringing the public a bigger variety of better and well payed recording artists.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the dangerous legal precedents that are being set in these US lawsuits is terrible.<br /> The number of songs (or files) shared should be irrelevant. They should setup a fixed fee. Making the argument that each song she &#8220;stole&#8221; is worth at least 480USD (considering she was sharing around 4000 like the RIAA claims) is ridiculous. How much is a song on iTunes store? How much is a discography bought on ebay divided by the number of songs?</p><p>There should be a more reasonable, fixed fine for filesharing. Its like like speeding; everyone knows they shouldn&#8217;t do it but they do it anyway. Prosecuting like this is ridiculous and has made everyone hate the RIAA. Going after trackers and indexers like ThePirateBay isn&#8217;t gonna work either.</p><p>Maybe the RIAA should concentrate on bringing the public a bigger variety of better and well payed recording artists.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael the Dumb Tec</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/19/222000-filesharing-fine-leaps-to-1-92-million-in-new-trial/#comment-164134</link> <dc:creator>Michael the Dumb Tec</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=14620#comment-164134</guid> <description>I like this lawyer kid. He&#039;s spunky. The whole system (which luckily they&#039;re moving away from) that RIAA employs is retarded. &quot;Sue a bunch of regular people for more money than they could ever have, and hope that they&#039;ll settle and we can make a point and recoup some of the lawyer fees we just flushed down the toilet.&quot; Their new approach of just contacting the ISP&#039;s and skipping the useless lawsuit step is much preferred. That&#039;s what they should&#039;ve done in the first place. I commend this woman for not rolling over like so many others have and taking &amp; settling out of court. Also, in the article above, it says $3,000 was the average settlement before court. Is that $3,000 total or per song? I thought I&#039;d seen $3,000 per song, and that (like in this case) can add up very quickly. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this lawyer kid. He&#039;s spunky.</p><p>The whole system (which luckily they&#039;re moving away from) that RIAA employs is retarded. &quot;Sue a bunch of regular people for more money than they could ever have, and hope that they&#039;ll settle and we can make a point and recoup some of the lawyer fees we just flushed down the toilet.&quot;</p><p>Their new approach of just contacting the ISP&#039;s and skipping the useless lawsuit step is much preferred. That&#039;s what they should&#039;ve done in the first place.</p><p>I commend this woman for not rolling over like so many others have and taking &amp; settling out of court.</p><p>Also, in the article above, it says $3,000 was the average settlement before court. Is that $3,000 total or per song? I thought I&#039;d seen $3,000 per song, and that (like in this case) can add up very quickly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael the Dumb Tech Geek</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/19/222000-filesharing-fine-leaps-to-1-92-million-in-new-trial/#comment-272134</link> <dc:creator>Michael the Dumb Tech Geek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=14620#comment-272134</guid> <description>I like this lawyer kid. He&#039;s spunky. The whole system (which luckily they&#039;re moving away from) that RIAA employs is retarded. &quot;Sue a bunch of regular people for more money than they could ever have, and hope that they&#039;ll settle and we can make a point and recoup some of the lawyer fees we just flushed down the toilet.&quot; Their new approach of just contacting the ISP&#039;s and skipping the useless lawsuit step is much preferred. That&#039;s what they should&#039;ve done in the first place. I commend this woman for not rolling over like so many others have and taking &amp; settling out of court. Also, in the article above, it says $3,000 was the average settlement before court. Is that $3,000 total or per song? I thought I&#039;d seen $3,000 per song, and that (like in this case) can add up very quickly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this lawyer kid. He&#8217;s spunky.<br /> The whole system (which luckily they&#8217;re moving away from) that RIAA employs is retarded. &#8220;Sue a bunch of regular people for more money than they could ever have, and hope that they&#8217;ll settle and we can make a point and recoup some of the lawyer fees we just flushed down the toilet.&#8221;<br /> Their new approach of just contacting the ISP&#8217;s and skipping the useless lawsuit step is much preferred. That&#8217;s what they should&#8217;ve done in the first place.<br /> I commend this woman for not rolling over like so many others have and taking &amp; settling out of court.<br /> Also, in the article above, it says $3,000 was the average settlement before court. Is that $3,000 total or per song? I thought I&#8217;d seen $3,000 per song, and that (like in this case) can add up very quickly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael the Dumb Tech Geek</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/19/222000-filesharing-fine-leaps-to-1-92-million-in-new-trial/#comment-272135</link> <dc:creator>Michael the Dumb Tech Geek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=14620#comment-272135</guid> <description>I like this lawyer kid. He&#039;s spunky. The whole system (which luckily they&#039;re moving away from) that RIAA employs is retarded. &quot;Sue a bunch of regular people for more money than they could ever have, and hope that they&#039;ll settle and we can make a point and recoup some of the lawyer fees we just flushed down the toilet.&quot; Their new approach of just contacting the ISP&#039;s and skipping the useless lawsuit step is much preferred. That&#039;s what they should&#039;ve done in the first place. I commend this woman for not rolling over like so many others have and taking &amp; settling out of court. Also, in the article above, it says $3,000 was the average settlement before court. Is that $3,000 total or per song? I thought I&#039;d seen $3,000 per song, and that (like in this case) can add up very quickly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this lawyer kid. He&#8217;s spunky.<br /> The whole system (which luckily they&#8217;re moving away from) that RIAA employs is retarded. &#8220;Sue a bunch of regular people for more money than they could ever have, and hope that they&#8217;ll settle and we can make a point and recoup some of the lawyer fees we just flushed down the toilet.&#8221;<br /> Their new approach of just contacting the ISP&#8217;s and skipping the useless lawsuit step is much preferred. That&#8217;s what they should&#8217;ve done in the first place.<br /> I commend this woman for not rolling over like so many others have and taking &amp; settling out of court.<br /> Also, in the article above, it says $3,000 was the average settlement before court. Is that $3,000 total or per song? I thought I&#8217;d seen $3,000 per song, and that (like in this case) can add up very quickly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 06:14:10 -->
