<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Disney Taps Kiddie Laptop Market</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/18/disney-taps-kiddie-laptop-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/18/disney-taps-kiddie-laptop-market/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:25:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Samurai IT Guy</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/18/disney-taps-kiddie-laptop-market/#comment-173551</link> <dc:creator>Samurai IT Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=14581#comment-173551</guid> <description>My niece would be in heaven if she had that. That would totally blow her mind, I&#039;m definitely going to have to forward this article to my sister now! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My niece would be in heaven if she had that. That would totally blow her mind, I&#039;m definitely going to have to forward this article to my sister now!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Samurai IT Guy</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/18/disney-taps-kiddie-laptop-market/#comment-277251</link> <dc:creator>Samurai IT Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=14581#comment-277251</guid> <description>My niece would be in heaven if she had that. That would totally blow her mind, I&#039;m definitely going to have to forward this article to my sister now!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My niece would be in heaven if she had that. That would totally blow her mind, I&#8217;m definitely going to have to forward this article to my sister now!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/18/disney-taps-kiddie-laptop-market/#comment-163892</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=14581#comment-163892</guid> <description>It isn&#039;t really a nice thought thinking of kids with their own laptops, if you had your own first computer when you were older. I&#039;m 21 now. My family had a computer since I was about 7. We went online when I was about 10. We had a couple of computers since hten. I got my first computer, an over-powered laptop paid for by my granddad&#039;s will, when I was 17. I got a Mac mini when I was 18 and an MSI Wind at 21. So while it&#039;s kinda weird to think of little kids having their own computers, all the power to them. If I had been tinkering away earlier, chances are I&#039;d be way better at web design and development now. These kids won&#039;t stay obsessed with Disney forever and soon they&#039;ll be the new breed of geeks. The only real problem - beyond getting your head around kids learning to read on screens instead of books and playing games not on the little kiddy TV controller console, but online instead - is the parental controls. I like the idea of a whitelist, because a blacklist for the internet, as it expands so much daily, is totally pointless for hoping to block out all porn/violence/etc. Then they can just hook them up to the kids&#039; TV channel websites, a couple of educational sites and any more specific sites their kid will want to visit. I&#039;m surprised there aren&#039;t far more parental controls with a whitelist. The only problem is if these whitelisted sites still allow external links to work, because some external links are useful and others are just ads which could lead onto sites with ads that lead to other sites (with the cycle continuing) that kids shouldn&#039;t be on. Good on Disney, though. Let&#039;s just hope the branding doesn&#039;t go over the top and it&#039;s still just a nice way to get kids into geekery. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#039;t really a nice thought thinking of kids with their own laptops, if you had your own first computer when you were older.</p><p>I&#039;m 21 now. My family had a computer since I was about 7. We went online when I was about 10. We had a couple of computers since hten. I got my first computer, an over-powered laptop paid for by my granddad&#039;s will, when I was 17. I got a Mac mini when I was 18 and an MSI Wind at 21.</p><p>So while it&#039;s kinda weird to think of little kids having their own computers, all the power to them. If I had been tinkering away earlier, chances are I&#039;d be way better at web design and development now. These kids won&#039;t stay obsessed with Disney forever and soon they&#039;ll be the new breed of geeks.</p><p>The only real problem &#8211; beyond getting your head around kids learning to read on screens instead of books and playing games not on the little kiddy TV controller console, but online instead &#8211; is the parental controls.</p><p>I like the idea of a whitelist, because a blacklist for the internet, as it expands so much daily, is totally pointless for hoping to block out all porn/violence/etc. Then they can just hook them up to the kids&#039; TV channel websites, a couple of educational sites and any more specific sites their kid will want to visit. I&#039;m surprised there aren&#039;t far more parental controls with a whitelist. The only problem is if these whitelisted sites still allow external links to work, because some external links are useful and others are just ads which could lead onto sites with ads that lead to other sites (with the cycle continuing) that kids shouldn&#039;t be on.</p><p>Good on Disney, though. Let&#039;s just hope the branding doesn&#039;t go over the top and it&#039;s still just a nice way to get kids into geekery.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/18/disney-taps-kiddie-laptop-market/#comment-277250</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=14581#comment-277250</guid> <description>It isn&#039;t really a nice thought thinking of kids with their own laptops, if you had your own first computer when you were older.I&#039;m 21 now. My family had a computer since I was about 7. We went online when I was about 10. We had a couple of computers since hten. I got my first computer, an over-powered laptop paid for by my granddad&#039;s will, when I was 17. I got a Mac mini when I was 18 and an MSI Wind at 21.So while it&#039;s kinda weird to think of little kids having their own computers, all the power to them. If I had been tinkering away earlier, chances are I&#039;d be way better at web design and development now. These kids won&#039;t stay obsessed with Disney forever and soon they&#039;ll be the new breed of geeks.The only real problem - beyond getting your head around kids learning to read on screens instead of books and playing games not on the little kiddy TV controller console, but online instead - is the parental controls.I like the idea of a whitelist, because a blacklist for the internet, as it expands so much daily, is totally pointless for hoping to block out all porn/violence/etc. Then they can just hook them up to the kids&#039; TV channel websites, a couple of educational sites and any more specific sites their kid will want to visit. I&#039;m surprised there aren&#039;t far more parental controls with a whitelist. The only problem is if these whitelisted sites still allow external links to work, because some external links are useful and others are just ads which could lead onto sites with ads that lead to other sites (with the cycle continuing) that kids shouldn&#039;t be on.Good on Disney, though. Let&#039;s just hope the branding doesn&#039;t go over the top and it&#039;s still just a nice way to get kids into geekery.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It isn&#8217;t really a nice thought thinking of kids with their own laptops, if you had your own first computer when you were older.</p><p>I&#8217;m 21 now. My family had a computer since I was about 7. We went online when I was about 10. We had a couple of computers since hten. I got my first computer, an over-powered laptop paid for by my granddad&#8217;s will, when I was 17. I got a Mac mini when I was 18 and an MSI Wind at 21.</p><p>So while it&#8217;s kinda weird to think of little kids having their own computers, all the power to them. If I had been tinkering away earlier, chances are I&#8217;d be way better at web design and development now. These kids won&#8217;t stay obsessed with Disney forever and soon they&#8217;ll be the new breed of geeks.</p><p>The only real problem &#8211; beyond getting your head around kids learning to read on screens instead of books and playing games not on the little kiddy TV controller console, but online instead &#8211; is the parental controls.</p><p>I like the idea of a whitelist, because a blacklist for the internet, as it expands so much daily, is totally pointless for hoping to block out all porn/violence/etc. Then they can just hook them up to the kids&#8217; TV channel websites, a couple of educational sites and any more specific sites their kid will want to visit. I&#8217;m surprised there aren&#8217;t far more parental controls with a whitelist. The only problem is if these whitelisted sites still allow external links to work, because some external links are useful and others are just ads which could lead onto sites with ads that lead to other sites (with the cycle continuing) that kids shouldn&#8217;t be on.</p><p>Good on Disney, though. Let&#8217;s just hope the branding doesn&#8217;t go over the top and it&#8217;s still just a nice way to get kids into geekery.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Lister</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/18/disney-taps-kiddie-laptop-market/#comment-163862</link> <dc:creator>John Lister</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=14581#comment-163862</guid> <description>I bought my laptop in 2005. There&#039;s something quite depressing about the idea of six-year-old girls clad in Princess Pink having a machine with better specs... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought my laptop in 2005. There&#039;s something quite depressing about the idea of six-year-old girls clad in Princess Pink having a machine with better specs&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Lister</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/06/18/disney-taps-kiddie-laptop-market/#comment-277249</link> <dc:creator>John Lister</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=14581#comment-277249</guid> <description>I bought my laptop in 2005. There&#039;s something quite depressing about the idea of six-year-old girls clad in Princess Pink having a machine with better specs...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought my laptop in 2005. There&#8217;s something quite depressing about the idea of six-year-old girls clad in Princess Pink having a machine with better specs&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-13 20:50:20 -->
