<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Wave: Reinventing online communication</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-160354</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-160354</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know about you, but I get plenty of spam &quot;friend&quot; requests from services like Facebook and Twitter. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know about you, but I get plenty of spam &quot;friend&quot; requests from services like Facebook and Twitter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-271813</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-271813</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know about you, but I get plenty of spam &quot;friend&quot; requests from services like Facebook and Twitter.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but I get plenty of spam &#8220;friend&#8221; requests from services like Facebook and Twitter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sidelobe</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-160242</link> <dc:creator>sidelobe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-160242</guid> <description>The solution is already in sight: social media messaging with inter-service message exchange. Once you authenticate all of the senders, spam becomes much easier to control. Nobody sends you messages without your permission. You will  grant &quot;friends&quot; requests for companies, etc. just like you do people. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solution is already in sight: social media messaging with inter-service message exchange. Once you authenticate all of the senders, spam becomes much easier to control. Nobody sends you messages without your permission. You will  grant &quot;friends&quot; requests for companies, etc. just like you do people.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sidelobe</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-271812</link> <dc:creator>sidelobe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-271812</guid> <description>The solution is already in sight: social media messaging with inter-service message exchange. Once you authenticate all of the senders, spam becomes much easier to control. Nobody sends you messages without your permission. You will  grant &quot;friends&quot; requests for companies, etc. just like you do people.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solution is already in sight: social media messaging with inter-service message exchange. Once you authenticate all of the senders, spam becomes much easier to control. Nobody sends you messages without your permission. You will  grant &#8220;friends&#8221; requests for companies, etc. just like you do people.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-159989</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-159989</guid> <description>The GMail spam filter does work pretty well, but it&#039;s far from a perfect solution.  I&#039;m still hoping unrealistically for a something that precludes spam by design rather than just fighting it off. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GMail spam filter does work pretty well, but it&#039;s far from a perfect solution.  I&#039;m still hoping unrealistically for a something that precludes spam by design rather than just fighting it off.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-271811</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-271811</guid> <description>The GMail spam filter does work pretty well, but it&#039;s far from a perfect solution.  I&#039;m still hoping unrealistically for a something that precludes spam by design rather than just fighting it off.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GMail spam filter does work pretty well, but it&#8217;s far from a perfect solution.  I&#8217;m still hoping unrealistically for a something that precludes spam by design rather than just fighting it off.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-159988</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-159988</guid> <description>Next on the block: GMail. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next on the block: GMail.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-271810</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-271810</guid> <description>Next on the block: GMail.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next on the block: GMail.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Y</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-159878</link> <dc:creator>Steve Y</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-159878</guid> <description>Nice write up. I actually found this because I had the same question regarding spam rogue wave servers. I figure they are likely to modify postini/their email filters to include waves. I do agree that this could very well be email v2.0 </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice write up. I actually found this because I had the same question regarding spam rogue wave servers. I figure they are likely to modify postini/their email filters to include waves.</p><p>I do agree that this could very well be email v2.0</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Y</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-271809</link> <dc:creator>Steve Y</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-271809</guid> <description>Nice write up. I actually found this because I had the same question regarding spam rogue wave servers. I figure they are likely to modify postini/their email filters to include waves.I do agree that this could very well be email v2.0</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice write up. I actually found this because I had the same question regarding spam rogue wave servers. I figure they are likely to modify postini/their email filters to include waves.</p><p>I do agree that this could very well be email v2.0</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan Rampersad</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-159833</link> <dc:creator>Ryan Rampersad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-159833</guid> <description>Seeing this, I don&#039;t think it is so bad they threw the Google talk client out the window. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing this, I don&#039;t think it is so bad they threw the Google talk client out the window.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ryan Rampersad</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/28/google-wave-reinventing-online-communication/#comment-271808</link> <dc:creator>Ryan Rampersad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13746#comment-271808</guid> <description>Seeing this, I don&#039;t think it is so bad they threw the Google talk client out the window.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing this, I don&#8217;t think it is so bad they threw the Google talk client out the window.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 01:59:49 -->
