<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Science News Cycle</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Catherine A. Fiorell</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-285240</link> <dc:creator>Catherine A. Fiorell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-285240</guid> <description>That&#039;s a rho, not a p. The correlation is .56. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s a rho, not a p. The correlation is .56.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alan J</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-256666</link> <dc:creator>Alan J</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-256666</guid> <description>P=.56? Thats not even close to statistically valid D: </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P=.56? Thats not even close to statistically valid D:</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alan J</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-277195</link> <dc:creator>Alan J</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-277195</guid> <description>P=.56? Thats not even close to statistically valid D:</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P=.56? Thats not even close to statistically valid D:</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ironrunes</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-256659</link> <dc:creator>ironrunes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-256659</guid> <description>@Markleblerry: so it is not a cycle. Witch leads us back to what Matt was pointing out. So this is a cycle, but the comic is not. :D </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Markleblerry: so it is not a cycle. Witch leads us back to what Matt was pointing out.</p><p>So this is a cycle, but the comic is not. :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ironrunes</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-277194</link> <dc:creator>ironrunes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-277194</guid> <description>@Markleblerry: so it is not a cycle. Witch leads us back to what Matt was pointing out. So this is a cycle, but the comic is not. :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Markleblerry: so it is not a cycle. Witch leads us back to what Matt was pointing out.<br /> So this is a cycle, but the comic is not. :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Markleberry</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-256658</link> <dc:creator>Markleberry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-256658</guid> <description>@Matt: It doesn&#039;t. If you look, there&#039;s no arrow. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt: It doesn&#039;t. If you look, there&#039;s no arrow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Markleberry</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-277193</link> <dc:creator>Markleberry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-277193</guid> <description>@Matt: It doesn&#039;t. If you look, there&#039;s no arrow.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt: It doesn&#8217;t. If you look, there&#8217;s no arrow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael the Dumb Tec</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-159457</link> <dc:creator>Michael the Dumb Tec</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-159457</guid> <description>@Matt Very good point. I didn&#039;t even notice that. I have noticed this trend myself before. Web news and news broadcasts both take the taglines way over the top just to enhance viewership. But in my opinion they shoot themselves in the foot. I don&#039;t watch the news much anymore because I got tired of &quot;YOUR KIDS WILL DIE FROM EXPOSURE TO THIS&quot; to find out that if I force-feed them 20 paint chips it might be a choking hazard. Totally burnt out on the whole news world. Case in point: did anyone pay attention to this &#039;swine flu pandemic&#039; for more than a week? That&#039;s how long it took for me to stop caring. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt Very good point. I didn&#039;t even notice that.</p><p>I have noticed this trend myself before. Web news and news broadcasts both take the taglines way over the top just to enhance viewership. But in my opinion they shoot themselves in the foot. I don&#039;t watch the news much anymore because I got tired of &quot;YOUR KIDS WILL DIE FROM EXPOSURE TO THIS&quot; to find out that if I force-feed them 20 paint chips it might be a choking hazard. Totally burnt out on the whole news world.</p><p>Case in point: did anyone pay attention to this &#039;swine flu pandemic&#039; for more than a week? That&#039;s how long it took for me to stop caring.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael the Dumb Tech Geek</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-271750</link> <dc:creator>Michael the Dumb Tech Geek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-271750</guid> <description>@Matt Very good point. I didn&#039;t even notice that.I have noticed this trend myself before. Web news and news broadcasts both take the taglines way over the top just to enhance viewership. But in my opinion they shoot themselves in the foot. I don&#039;t watch the news much anymore because I got tired of &quot;YOUR KIDS WILL DIE FROM EXPOSURE TO THIS&quot; to find out that if I force-feed them 20 paint chips it might be a choking hazard. Totally burnt out on the whole news world. Case in point: did anyone pay attention to this &#039;swine flu pandemic&#039; for more than a week? That&#039;s how long it took for me to stop caring.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt Very good point. I didn&#8217;t even notice that.</p><p>I have noticed this trend myself before. Web news and news broadcasts both take the taglines way over the top just to enhance viewership. But in my opinion they shoot themselves in the foot. I don&#8217;t watch the news much anymore because I got tired of &#8220;YOUR KIDS WILL DIE FROM EXPOSURE TO THIS&#8221; to find out that if I force-feed them 20 paint chips it might be a choking hazard. Totally burnt out on the whole news world.<br /> Case in point: did anyone pay attention to this &#8216;swine flu pandemic&#8217; for more than a week? That&#8217;s how long it took for me to stop caring.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-159333</link> <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-159333</guid> <description>Funny and true. But not a cycle. How does Grandma&#039;s foil hat lead to the research step? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny and true. But not a cycle. How does Grandma&#039;s foil hat lead to the research step?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-271749</link> <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-271749</guid> <description>Funny and true. But not a cycle. How does Grandma&#039;s foil hat lead to the research step?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny and true. But not a cycle. How does Grandma&#8217;s foil hat lead to the research step?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmy Rogers</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/26/the-science-news-cycle/#comment-159331</link> <dc:creator>Jimmy Rogers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13667#comment-159331</guid> <description>The day that comic came out, my local news did a story about SOMETHING (I can&#039;t remember what) that was totally in alignment with Step 6.  I was amazed! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The day that comic came out, my local news did a story about SOMETHING (I can&#039;t remember what) that was totally in alignment with Step 6.  I was amazed!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-13 21:36:49 -->
