<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Blogs &amp; the Life of Journalism: Welcome to the Jungle</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Ron Johnson</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-254725</link> <dc:creator>Ron Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-254725</guid> <description>It would be nice to see/read more top shelf material from Blogger&#039;s. I very rarely follow any blogs, mainly because the content is sub-par at best. It seems many people think that having a blog makes them a good writer or even......talented. Not the case. For that point of view, I do agree with Keen. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to see/read more top shelf material from Blogger&#039;s. I very rarely follow any blogs, mainly because the content is sub-par at best. It seems many people think that having a blog makes them a good writer or even&#8230;&#8230;talented. Not the case. For that point of view, I do agree with Keen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ron Johnson</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-277156</link> <dc:creator>Ron Johnson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-277156</guid> <description>It would be nice to see/read more top shelf material from Blogger&#039;s. I very rarely follow any blogs, mainly because the content is sub-par at best. It seems many people think that having a blog makes them a good writer or even......talented. Not the case. For that point of view, I do agree with Keen.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to see/read more top shelf material from Blogger&#8217;s. I very rarely follow any blogs, mainly because the content is sub-par at best. It seems many people think that having a blog makes them a good writer or even&#8230;&#8230;talented. Not the case. For that point of view, I do agree with Keen.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Preston L. Bannister</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-271503</link> <dc:creator>Preston L. Bannister</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-271503</guid> <description>Casey makes one common error when she says &quot;we need objective, professional journalists to responsibly collect the news.&quot; I completely agree with the intent. We need objective, skilled reporters to collect the news. We need skilled journalists to write about the news. We need skilled editorial review to catch mistakes, and insure the highest quality result. The above is &lt;b&gt;NOT&lt;/b&gt; the usual result of &quot;professional journalism&quot;. What we want is skill. We would &lt;i&gt;like&lt;/i&gt; to believe that &quot;professional&quot; journalists are highly skilled - but the evidence does not support that conclusion. Reporters are often sloppy in collecting news. Journalists need to be popular and write regularly, but often produce articles of no value. Editorial review often lets through poor work. Newspapers are dying because there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://bannister.us/weblog/2009/03/16/newspapers-obsolete/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;better alternatives&lt;/a&gt;, and due to &lt;a href=&quot;http://bannister.us/weblog/2009/03/02/professional-journalism-is-evil/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;inherent poor quality&lt;/a&gt;. Newspapers as a profitable enterprise were enabled by (then new) technology, and existed only as long as there was nothing better. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casey makes one common error when she says &quot;we need objective, professional journalists to responsibly collect the news.&quot;</p><p>I completely agree with the intent. We need objective, skilled reporters to collect the news. We need skilled journalists to write about the news. We need skilled editorial review to catch mistakes, and insure the highest quality result.</p><p>The above is <b>NOT</b> the usual result of &quot;professional journalism&quot;. What we want is skill. We would <i>like</i> to believe that &quot;professional&quot; journalists are highly skilled &#8211; but the evidence does not support that conclusion. Reporters are often sloppy in collecting news. Journalists need to be popular and write regularly, but often produce articles of no value. Editorial review often lets through poor work.</p><p>Newspapers are dying because there are <a href="http://bannister.us/weblog/2009/03/16/newspapers-obsolete/" rel="nofollow">better alternatives</a>, and due to <a href="http://bannister.us/weblog/2009/03/02/professional-journalism-is-evil/" rel="nofollow">inherent poor quality</a>.</p><p>Newspapers as a profitable enterprise were enabled by (then new) technology, and existed only as long as there was nothing better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geeks are Sexy</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-156161</link> <dc:creator>Geeks are Sexy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-156161</guid> <description>One of the thing I&#039;d like to mention is that several readers of this blog have already told me that they often are NOT interested in reading the full articles we point to, and prefer to read a well made summary. That is really unfortunate, but what can we do about it? People today are busy... too busy probably. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the thing I&#039;d like to mention is that several readers of this blog have already told me that they often are NOT interested in reading the full articles we point to, and prefer to read a well made summary. That is really unfortunate, but what can we do about it? People today are busy&#8230; too busy probably.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geeks are Sexy</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-271502</link> <dc:creator>Geeks are Sexy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-271502</guid> <description>One of the thing I&#039;d like to mention is that several readers of this blog have already told me that they often are NOT interested in reading the full articles we point to, and prefer to read a well made summary. That is really unfortunate, but what can we do about it? People today are busy... too busy probably.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the thing I&#8217;d like to mention is that several readers of this blog have already told me that they often are NOT interested in reading the full articles we point to, and prefer to read a well made summary. That is really unfortunate, but what can we do about it? People today are busy&#8230; too busy probably.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Miss Cellania</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-156160</link> <dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-156160</guid> <description>This is exactly how I use blogs and expect readers to also use them, as filters for connecting people to information they are interested in. I scan all kinds of blogs and news sources, then slot the information into any of the six blogs I work with -which all have different audiences with different interests. I hope the reader will use the source links and get the big picture, since I only give a little picture. I can&#039;t stand articles that don&#039;t use source links. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly how I use blogs and expect readers to also use them, as filters for connecting people to information they are interested in. I scan all kinds of blogs and news sources, then slot the information into any of the six blogs I work with -which all have different audiences with different interests. I hope the reader will use the source links and get the big picture, since I only give a little picture. I can&#039;t stand articles that don&#039;t use source links.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Miss Cellania</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-271501</link> <dc:creator>Miss Cellania</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-271501</guid> <description>This is exactly how I use blogs and expect readers to also use them, as filters for connecting people to information they are interested in. I scan all kinds of blogs and news sources, then slot the information into any of the six blogs I work with -which all have different audiences with different interests. I hope the reader will use the source links and get the big picture, since I only give a little picture. I can&#039;t stand articles that don&#039;t use source links.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly how I use blogs and expect readers to also use them, as filters for connecting people to information they are interested in. I scan all kinds of blogs and news sources, then slot the information into any of the six blogs I work with -which all have different audiences with different interests. I hope the reader will use the source links and get the big picture, since I only give a little picture. I can&#8217;t stand articles that don&#8217;t use source links.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Preston L. Bannister</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-156217</link> <dc:creator>Preston L. Bannister</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:13:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-156217</guid> <description>Casey makes one common error when she says &quot;we need objective, professional journalists to responsibly collect the news.&quot; I completely agree with the intent. We need objective, skilled reporters to collect the news. We need skilled journalists to write about the news. We need skilled editorial review to catch mistakes, and insure the highest quality result. The above is &lt;b&gt;NOT&lt;/b&gt; the usual result of &quot;professional journalism&quot;. What we want is skill. We would &lt;i&gt;like&lt;/i&gt; to believe that &quot;professional&quot; journalists are highly skilled - but the evidence does not support that conclusion. Reporters are often sloppy in collecting news. Journalists need to be popular and write regularly, but often produce articles of no value. Editorial review often lets through poor work. Newspapers are dying because there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://bannister.us/weblog/2009/03/16/newspapers-obsolete/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;better alternatives&lt;/a&gt;, and due to &lt;a href=&quot;http://bannister.us/weblog/2009/03/02/professional-journalism-is-evil/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;inherent poor quality&lt;/a&gt;. Newspapers as a profitable enterprise were enabled by (then new) technology, and existed only as long as there was nothing better. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casey makes one common error when she says &quot;we need objective, professional journalists to responsibly collect the news.&quot;</p><p>I completely agree with the intent. We need objective, skilled reporters to collect the news. We need skilled journalists to write about the news. We need skilled editorial review to catch mistakes, and insure the highest quality result.</p><p>The above is <b>NOT</b> the usual result of &quot;professional journalism&quot;. What we want is skill. We would <i>like</i> to believe that &quot;professional&quot; journalists are highly skilled &#8211; but the evidence does not support that conclusion. Reporters are often sloppy in collecting news. Journalists need to be popular and write regularly, but often produce articles of no value. Editorial review often lets through poor work.</p><p>Newspapers are dying because there are <a href="http://bannister.us/weblog/2009/03/16/newspapers-obsolete/" rel="nofollow">better alternatives</a>, and due to <a href="http://bannister.us/weblog/2009/03/02/professional-journalism-is-evil/" rel="nofollow">inherent poor quality</a>.</p><p>Newspapers as a profitable enterprise were enabled by (then new) technology, and existed only as long as there was nothing better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmy Rogers</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-156075</link> <dc:creator>Jimmy Rogers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-156075</guid> <description>Lol, as a biologist, the analogy that comes to mind is the competition between r selecting and k selecting organisms.  That is, bloggers are rapidly reproducing and quick to colonize.  Journalists are slow to populate and slow to get their stories out there, but they weather harsh conditions much better and can make a larger impact more easily. In nature r selectors usually take over new territory first and then k selectors move into it and eventually push the r&#039;s out.  Wonder if that will happen on the internet! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, as a biologist, the analogy that comes to mind is the competition between r selecting and k selecting organisms.  That is, bloggers are rapidly reproducing and quick to colonize.  Journalists are slow to populate and slow to get their stories out there, but they weather harsh conditions much better and can make a larger impact more easily.</p><p>In nature r selectors usually take over new territory first and then k selectors move into it and eventually push the r&#039;s out.  Wonder if that will happen on the internet!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmy Rogers</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-271499</link> <dc:creator>Jimmy Rogers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-271499</guid> <description>Lol, as a biologist, the analogy that comes to mind is the competition between r selecting and k selecting organisms.  That is, bloggers are rapidly reproducing and quick to colonize.  Journalists are slow to populate and slow to get their stories out there, but they weather harsh conditions much better and can make a larger impact more easily.In nature r selectors usually take over new territory first and then k selectors move into it and eventually push the r&#039;s out.  Wonder if that will happen on the internet!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, as a biologist, the analogy that comes to mind is the competition between r selecting and k selecting organisms.  That is, bloggers are rapidly reproducing and quick to colonize.  Journalists are slow to populate and slow to get their stories out there, but they weather harsh conditions much better and can make a larger impact more easily.</p><p>In nature r selectors usually take over new territory first and then k selectors move into it and eventually push the r&#8217;s out.  Wonder if that will happen on the internet!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmy Rogers</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-271500</link> <dc:creator>Jimmy Rogers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-271500</guid> <description>Lol, as a biologist, the analogy that comes to mind is the competition between r selecting and k selecting organisms.  That is, bloggers are rapidly reproducing and quick to colonize.  Journalists are slow to populate and slow to get their stories out there, but they weather harsh conditions much better and can make a larger impact more easily.In nature r selectors usually take over new territory first and then k selectors move into it and eventually push the r&#039;s out.  Wonder if that will happen on the internet!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, as a biologist, the analogy that comes to mind is the competition between r selecting and k selecting organisms.  That is, bloggers are rapidly reproducing and quick to colonize.  Journalists are slow to populate and slow to get their stories out there, but they weather harsh conditions much better and can make a larger impact more easily.</p><p>In nature r selectors usually take over new territory first and then k selectors move into it and eventually push the r&#8217;s out.  Wonder if that will happen on the internet!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimmy Rogers</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/05/12/blogs-the-life-of-journalism-welcome-to-the-jungle/#comment-156074</link> <dc:creator>Jimmy Rogers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=13171#comment-156074</guid> <description>I like the idea of blogs as filter for solid info, but directed at the right people. I also think it&#039;s worth pointing out that bloggers may not be journalists, but they are a diverse group with ideas and opinions that might have been kept out of the mainstream in previous years. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of blogs as filter for solid info, but directed at the right people.</p><p>I also think it&#039;s worth pointing out that bloggers may not be journalists, but they are a diverse group with ideas and opinions that might have been kept out of the mainstream in previous years.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 06:38:10 -->
