<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Still Owns You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:14:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-136823</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-136823</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m so glad they backed down on their TOU!  But, it&#039;s scary where FB is headed..... are sexy social networks allowed? or are we like China nowadays...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m so glad they backed down on their TOU!  But, it&#8217;s scary where FB is headed&#8230;.. are sexy social networks allowed? or are we like China nowadays&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coffee</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-136781</link>
		<dc:creator>coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-136781</guid>
		<description>the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that they knew they were wrong in the first place</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that they knew they were wrong in the first place</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SL</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-136653</link>
		<dc:creator>SL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-136653</guid>
		<description>Chuckling at a typo in your intro - it&#039;s &quot;backpedaling,&quot; not &quot;packpeddling&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuckling at a typo in your intro &#8211; it&#8217;s &#8220;backpedaling,&#8221; not &#8220;packpeddling&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Gaff</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-136506</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Gaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-136506</guid>
		<description>Chris Brogan had an interesting post when the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrisbrogan.com/wake-up-to-how-you-share-on-the-web/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;facebook TOS change&lt;/a&gt; originally came out. His argument boiled down to: &quot;you already don&#039;t own anything&quot;. Companies that provide services for us have been selling our personal information for years. It&#039;s why we get telemarketing calls, credit card offers, and email spam. Privacy statements and anti-telemarketing laws are all reactive responses to this problem, not pro-active approaches to privacy.
Without weighing in on what our privacy rights should be, I&#039;d just like to point out that some of Gen-X and almost all of Gen-Y have a completely different notion of privacy and personal transparency. I think facebook et. al. are just mirrors of a cultural shift we&#039;re undergoing, not drivers of that shift. In other words, there are large groups of people who could care less what happens to their content on facebook.

So do I own this comment, or do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Brogan had an interesting post when the <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/wake-up-to-how-you-share-on-the-web/" rel="nofollow">facebook TOS change</a> originally came out. His argument boiled down to: &#8220;you already don&#8217;t own anything&#8221;. Companies that provide services for us have been selling our personal information for years. It&#8217;s why we get telemarketing calls, credit card offers, and email spam. Privacy statements and anti-telemarketing laws are all reactive responses to this problem, not pro-active approaches to privacy.<br />
Without weighing in on what our privacy rights should be, I&#8217;d just like to point out that some of Gen-X and almost all of Gen-Y have a completely different notion of privacy and personal transparency. I think facebook et. al. are just mirrors of a cultural shift we&#8217;re undergoing, not drivers of that shift. In other words, there are large groups of people who could care less what happens to their content on facebook.</p>
<p>So do I own this comment, or do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
