<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Facebook Still Owns You</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-136823</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-136823</guid> <description>Yeah, I&#039;m so glad they backed down on their TOU!  But, it&#039;s scary where FB is headed..... are sexy social networks allowed? or are we like China nowadays... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#039;m so glad they backed down on their TOU!  But, it&#039;s scary where FB is headed&#8230;.. are sexy social networks allowed? or are we like China nowadays&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-270665</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-270665</guid> <description>Yeah, I&#039;m so glad they backed down on their TOU!  But, it&#039;s scary where FB is headed..... are sexy social networks allowed? or are we like China nowadays...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m so glad they backed down on their TOU!  But, it&#8217;s scary where FB is headed&#8230;.. are sexy social networks allowed? or are we like China nowadays&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: coffee</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-136781</link> <dc:creator>coffee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-136781</guid> <description>the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that they knew they were wrong in the first place </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that they knew they were wrong in the first place</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: coffee</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-270664</link> <dc:creator>coffee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-270664</guid> <description>the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that they knew they were wrong in the first place</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fact that Facebook change their TOS back so quickly is an indication that they knew they were wrong in the first place</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SL</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-136653</link> <dc:creator>SL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-136653</guid> <description>Chuckling at a typo in your intro - it&#039;s &quot;backpedaling,&quot; not &quot;packpeddling&quot;! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuckling at a typo in your intro &#8211; it&#039;s &quot;backpedaling,&quot; not &quot;packpeddling&quot;!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SL</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-270663</link> <dc:creator>SL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-270663</guid> <description>Chuckling at a typo in your intro - it&#039;s &quot;backpedaling,&quot; not &quot;packpeddling&quot;!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuckling at a typo in your intro &#8211; it&#8217;s &#8220;backpedaling,&#8221; not &#8220;packpeddling&#8221;!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Gaff</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-270662</link> <dc:creator>Doug Gaff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-270662</guid> <description>Chris Brogan had an interesting post when the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrisbrogan.com/wake-up-to-how-you-share-on-the-web/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;facebook TOS change&lt;/a&gt; originally came out. His argument boiled down to: &quot;you already don&#039;t own anything&quot;. Companies that provide services for us have been selling our personal information for years. It&#039;s why we get telemarketing calls, credit card offers, and email spam. Privacy statements and anti-telemarketing laws are all reactive responses to this problem, not pro-active approaches to privacy. Without weighing in on what our privacy rights should be, I&#039;d just like to point out that some of Gen-X and almost all of Gen-Y have a completely different notion of privacy and personal transparency. I think facebook et. al. are just mirrors of a cultural shift we&#039;re undergoing, not drivers of that shift. In other words, there are large groups of people who could care less what happens to their content on facebook. So do I own this comment, or do you? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Brogan had an interesting post when the <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/wake-up-to-how-you-share-on-the-web/" rel="nofollow">facebook TOS change</a> originally came out. His argument boiled down to: &quot;you already don&#039;t own anything&quot;. Companies that provide services for us have been selling our personal information for years. It&#039;s why we get telemarketing calls, credit card offers, and email spam. Privacy statements and anti-telemarketing laws are all reactive responses to this problem, not pro-active approaches to privacy.</p><p>Without weighing in on what our privacy rights should be, I&#039;d just like to point out that some of Gen-X and almost all of Gen-Y have a completely different notion of privacy and personal transparency. I think facebook et. al. are just mirrors of a cultural shift we&#039;re undergoing, not drivers of that shift. In other words, there are large groups of people who could care less what happens to their content on facebook.</p><p>So do I own this comment, or do you?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Gaff</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/02/20/facebook-still-owns-you/#comment-136506</link> <dc:creator>Doug Gaff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:42:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=10700#comment-136506</guid> <description>Chris Brogan had an interesting post when the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chrisbrogan.com/wake-up-to-how-you-share-on-the-web/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;facebook TOS change&lt;/a&gt; originally came out. His argument boiled down to: &quot;you already don&#039;t own anything&quot;. Companies that provide services for us have been selling our personal information for years. It&#039;s why we get telemarketing calls, credit card offers, and email spam. Privacy statements and anti-telemarketing laws are all reactive responses to this problem, not pro-active approaches to privacy. Without weighing in on what our privacy rights should be, I&#039;d just like to point out that some of Gen-X and almost all of Gen-Y have a completely different notion of privacy and personal transparency. I think facebook et. al. are just mirrors of a cultural shift we&#039;re undergoing, not drivers of that shift. In other words, there are large groups of people who could care less what happens to their content on facebook. So do I own this comment, or do you? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Brogan had an interesting post when the <a href="http://www.chrisbrogan.com/wake-up-to-how-you-share-on-the-web/" rel="nofollow">facebook TOS change</a> originally came out. His argument boiled down to: &quot;you already don&#039;t own anything&quot;. Companies that provide services for us have been selling our personal information for years. It&#039;s why we get telemarketing calls, credit card offers, and email spam. Privacy statements and anti-telemarketing laws are all reactive responses to this problem, not pro-active approaches to privacy.</p><p>Without weighing in on what our privacy rights should be, I&#039;d just like to point out that some of Gen-X and almost all of Gen-Y have a completely different notion of privacy and personal transparency. I think facebook et. al. are just mirrors of a cultural shift we&#039;re undergoing, not drivers of that shift. In other words, there are large groups of people who could care less what happens to their content on facebook.</p><p>So do I own this comment, or do you?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-13 21:51:57 -->
