Comments on: Flying cars to hit showrooms in 2010 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/ tech, science, news and social issues for geeks Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Annahttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-288273 Anna Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:45:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-288273 Just want to say your article is striking. The clearness in your post is simply spectacular and i can take for granted you are an expert on this field. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the effective work. -------------------------------------- <a href="//www.coachhiretoursinukeurope.com/" rel="nofollow"> tours in london </a> Just want to say your article is striking. The clearness in your post is simply spectacular and i can take for granted you are an expert on this field. Well with your permission allow me to grab your rss feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the effective work.

————————————–
 tours in london 

]]> By: Bob Lippmanhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-283462 Bob Lippman Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:59:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-283462 But when you add in the fees for renting hanger space, etc., is the Cessna still cheaper? My only issue is with possible damage to the wings and propeller that might occur while you are driving the "roadable" aircraft around town. But when you add in the fees for renting hanger space, etc., is the Cessna still cheaper? My only issue is with possible damage to the wings and propeller that might occur while you are driving the "roadable" aircraft around town.

]]> By: Chiphttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-130407 Chip Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:59:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-130407 I think most geeks agree, cooper. I think most geeks agree, cooper.

]]> By: Chiphttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-270176 Chip Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:59:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-270176 I think most geeks agree, cooper. I think most geeks agree, cooper.

]]> By: cooperhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-130325 cooper Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:08:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-130325 That is not at all Jetson-y. I think they should be much further along in this things. That is not at all Jetson-y. I think they should be much further along in this things.

]]> By: cooperhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-270175 cooper Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:08:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-270175 That is not at all Jetson-y. I think they should be much further along in this things. That is not at all Jetson-y. I think they should be much further along in this things.

]]> By: Chiphttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-130256 Chip Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:45:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-130256 If you live on the water, you can't beat it! If you live on the water, you can't beat it!

]]> By: Erichttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-270172 Eric Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:17:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-270172 Although you can't drive this one, I say the Icon A5 is way better. <a href="http://www.iconaircraft.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.iconaircraft.com/</a> Although you can't drive this one, I say the Icon A5 is way better.

http://www.iconaircraft.com/

]]> By: Chiphttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-270173 Chip Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:45:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-270173 If you live on the water, you can't beat it! If you live on the water, you can’t beat it!

]]> By: Chiphttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-270174 Chip Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:45:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-270174 If you live on the water, you can't beat it! If you live on the water, you can’t beat it!

]]> By: Chiphttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-130244 Chip Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:33:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-130244 For one thing, you could carry more than one passenger. Plus, you have a faster cruising speed and a longer range. The 172 is a sweet plane, and easy to fly. For one thing, you could carry more than one passenger. Plus, you have a faster cruising speed and a longer range. The 172 is a sweet plane, and easy to fly.

]]> By: Chiphttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/14/flying-cars-to-hit-showrooms-in-2010/#comment-130243 Chip Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:29:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9694#comment-130243 That's much more cool -- if it ever, um, gets off the ground. That's much more cool — if it ever, um, gets off the ground.

]]>