<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Lesson in Password Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/07/a-lesson-in-password-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/07/a-lesson-in-password-security/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:35:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/07/a-lesson-in-password-security/comment-page-1/#comment-132942</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9352#comment-132942</guid>
		<description>Many databases are protected by weak passwords.  The Twitter example shows how important it is to create really strong passwords and unique passwords for each site.  This seems too hard for many people so they opt for weaker security to prevent forgetting.  
I created ReKnow.ca to help with this problem.  People can create codes that are very secure and memorable.  Since they are memorable you never have to enter the same code in more than one location - even the ReKnow site never sees your code.

People can use passwords properly, they just have to reknow them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many databases are protected by weak passwords.  The Twitter example shows how important it is to create really strong passwords and unique passwords for each site.  This seems too hard for many people so they opt for weaker security to prevent forgetting.<br />
I created ReKnow.ca to help with this problem.  People can create codes that are very secure and memorable.  Since they are memorable you never have to enter the same code in more than one location &#8211; even the ReKnow site never sees your code.</p>
<p>People can use passwords properly, they just have to reknow them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coffee buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/07/a-lesson-in-password-security/comment-page-1/#comment-129027</link>
		<dc:creator>coffee buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9352#comment-129027</guid>
		<description>did the Twitter Admin change his password to &quot;sadness&quot; after he was hacked?  haha... ok not funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did the Twitter Admin change his password to &#8220;sadness&#8221; after he was hacked?  haha&#8230; ok not funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel-Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/07/a-lesson-in-password-security/comment-page-1/#comment-128602</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel-Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9352#comment-128602</guid>
		<description>Like in 
I &lt;3 password generators that produce pronouncable passwords that aren&#039;t dictionary words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like in<br />
I &lt;3 password generators that produce pronouncable passwords that aren&#8217;t dictionary words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DtD Software</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/01/07/a-lesson-in-password-security/comment-page-1/#comment-128598</link>
		<dc:creator>DtD Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=9352#comment-128598</guid>
		<description>I would enforce password complexity (through programming) for my staff, eg:
Require multiple cases
Require at least 2 numbers

You might go as far to require a non-keyboard character, like a heart! ♥
Or even &lt;3, that&#039;s more secure than nothin!

~DtD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would enforce password complexity (through programming) for my staff, eg:<br />
Require multiple cases<br />
Require at least 2 numbers</p>
<p>You might go as far to require a non-keyboard character, like a heart! ♥<br />
Or even &lt;3, that&#8217;s more secure than nothin!</p>
<p>~DtD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
