<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But Some of My Favorite Words Have Four Letters!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/10/20/but-some-of-my-favorite-words-have-four-letters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/10/20/but-some-of-my-favorite-words-have-four-letters/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:58:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kiltak</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/10/20/but-some-of-my-favorite-words-have-four-letters/#comment-111981</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiltak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=6479#comment-111981</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, Von, this is a multi-author blog btw, this was written by Casey, not Mark :)

K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, Von, this is a multi-author blog btw, this was written by Casey, not Mark :)</p>
<p>K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Von</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/10/20/but-some-of-my-favorite-words-have-four-letters/#comment-111969</link>
		<dc:creator>Von</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=6479#comment-111969</guid>
		<description>&quot;Second, define “objectionable”.  One person’s “objectionable” is another person’s “OK”.   Who gets to define what’s OK and what’s not?   OK, porn is definately not allowed.  That’s obviously objectionable.   But doesn’t that then open the door for activist groups to campaign for other types of websites to be blocked next?  The word “objectionable” is such a broad umberella term that covers so much.   Can’t you just see the lawsuits now by “outraged passengers” who were “forced” to look at “objectionable websites” while they were on their flight?   Now they are “mentally scarred for life” and only $10 million in damages, free air travel for life, and the blocking of said websites will heal their mental anguish.&quot;
-- Your own Mark O&#039;Neill. Now, replace &quot;objectionable&quot; with &quot;undesired&quot;, and enjoy.

Also, I like a world in which newsreaders can rip up and lambast inconsequential drivel on air. It&#039;d be a shame to have a quality rant auto-censored before it passed the producer&#039;s office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Second, define “objectionable”.  One person’s “objectionable” is another person’s “OK”.   Who gets to define what’s OK and what’s not?   OK, porn is definately not allowed.  That’s obviously objectionable.   But doesn’t that then open the door for activist groups to campaign for other types of websites to be blocked next?  The word “objectionable” is such a broad umberella term that covers so much.   Can’t you just see the lawsuits now by “outraged passengers” who were “forced” to look at “objectionable websites” while they were on their flight?   Now they are “mentally scarred for life” and only $10 million in damages, free air travel for life, and the blocking of said websites will heal their mental anguish.&#8221;<br />
&#8211; Your own Mark O&#8217;Neill. Now, replace &#8220;objectionable&#8221; with &#8220;undesired&#8221;, and enjoy.</p>
<p>Also, I like a world in which newsreaders can rip up and lambast inconsequential drivel on air. It&#8217;d be a shame to have a quality rant auto-censored before it passed the producer&#8217;s office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/10/20/but-some-of-my-favorite-words-have-four-letters/#comment-111859</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=6479#comment-111859</guid>
		<description>from the monday morning links:

epic fail.

:P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from the monday morning links:</p>
<p>epic fail.</p>
<p>:P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/10/20/but-some-of-my-favorite-words-have-four-letters/#comment-111856</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=6479#comment-111856</guid>
		<description>Maybe they don&#039;t have an interest in the technology for themselves, and are looking to license it to content providers (YouTube could buy it in a heartbeat). Or maybe MS is going to start their own video content service? Again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they don&#8217;t have an interest in the technology for themselves, and are looking to license it to content providers (YouTube could buy it in a heartbeat). Or maybe MS is going to start their own video content service? Again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
