<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Review: Google Chrome beta released for Windows</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: viger</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-311371</link> <dc:creator>viger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:55:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-311371</guid> <description>.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-133628</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-133628</guid> <description>Yeah, I noticed that difference, too.  Web page designers who try to match graphics to text can be in for trouble, though.  And when sizing elements to fit text, you need to use ems instead of pixels.  But that&#039;s just good webdev practice anyway. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I noticed that difference, too.  Web page designers who try to match graphics to text can be in for trouble, though.  And when sizing elements to fit text, you need to use ems instead of pixels.  But that&#039;s just good webdev practice anyway.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-133626</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-133626</guid> <description>Does it run Windows?  If so, I wonder what Windows message is being sent for scroll up?  If you have Visual Studio installed, you could use the Spy++ app to check it out. If you&#039;re not on Windows, then I have no idea how to diagnose that. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it run Windows?  If so, I wonder what Windows message is being sent for scroll up?  If you have Visual Studio installed, you could use the Spy++ app to check it out.</p><p>If you&#039;re not on Windows, then I have no idea how to diagnose that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-133624</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-133624</guid> <description>That&#039;s an interesting perspective, Dennis.  In my experience, Google Chrome gives up on page loads sooner than the other browsers.  I get a lot more page load failures that are cured by simply doing a refresh. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s an interesting perspective, Dennis.  In my experience, Google Chrome gives up on page loads sooner than the other browsers.  I get a lot more page load failures that are cured by simply doing a refresh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-133623</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-133623</guid> <description>I agree that no feed support is a definite deficit.  Hopefully that will be coming soon. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that no feed support is a definite deficit.  Hopefully that will be coming soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-133622</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-133622</guid> <description>I never noticed before that in Firefox when you press the scroll wheel you get some weird thing displayed in the middle of the page -- I&#039;m not sure how to use it, though.  So I don&#039;t miss that in Chrome, especially since just scrolling the wheel works fine. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never noticed before that in Firefox when you press the scroll wheel you get some weird thing displayed in the middle of the page &#8212; I&#039;m not sure how to use it, though.  So I don&#039;t miss that in Chrome, especially since just scrolling the wheel works fine.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Merly</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-133619</link> <dc:creator>Merly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-133619</guid> <description>I am not sure how to describe this but, I miss the scroll wheel feature that glides the pages when you&#039;ve pressed the wheel. Has anyone used this in Chrome? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure how to describe this but, I miss the scroll wheel feature that glides the pages when you&#039;ve pressed the wheel.</p><p>Has anyone used this in Chrome?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-268305</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:51:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-268305</guid> <description>Yeah, I noticed that difference, too.  Web page designers who try to match graphics to text can be in for trouble, though.  And when sizing elements to fit text, you need to use ems instead of pixels.  But that&#039;s just good webdev practice anyway.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I noticed that difference, too.  Web page designers who try to match graphics to text can be in for trouble, though.  And when sizing elements to fit text, you need to use ems instead of pixels.  But that&#8217;s just good webdev practice anyway.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-268304</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-268304</guid> <description>Does it run Windows?  If so, I wonder what Windows message is being sent for scroll up?  If you have Visual Studio installed, you could use the Spy++ app to check it out.If you&#039;re not on Windows, then I have no idea how to diagnose that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it run Windows?  If so, I wonder what Windows message is being sent for scroll up?  If you have Visual Studio installed, you could use the Spy++ app to check it out.</p><p>If you&#8217;re not on Windows, then I have no idea how to diagnose that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-268303</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-268303</guid> <description>That&#039;s an interesting perspective, Dennis.  In my experience, Google Chrome gives up on page loads sooner than the other browsers.  I get a lot more page load failures that are cured by simply doing a refresh.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting perspective, Dennis.  In my experience, Google Chrome gives up on page loads sooner than the other browsers.  I get a lot more page load failures that are cured by simply doing a refresh.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-268302</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-268302</guid> <description>I agree that no feed support is a definite deficit.  Hopefully that will be coming soon.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that no feed support is a definite deficit.  Hopefully that will be coming soon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chip</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/09/02/google-chrome-beta-released-for-windows/#comment-268301</link> <dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=4869#comment-268301</guid> <description>I never noticed before that in Firefox when you press the scroll wheel you get some weird thing displayed in the middle of the page -- I&#039;m not sure how to use it, though.  So I don&#039;t miss that in Chrome, especially since just scrolling the wheel works fine.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never noticed before that in Firefox when you press the scroll wheel you get some weird thing displayed in the middle of the page &#8212; I&#8217;m not sure how to use it, though.  So I don&#8217;t miss that in Chrome, especially since just scrolling the wheel works fine.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 03:27:40 -->
