<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Google Browser Sync rises from the dead</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/25/google-browser-sync-rises-from-the-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/25/google-browser-sync-rises-from-the-dead/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: John Jacob jing hyme</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/25/google-browser-sync-rises-from-the-dead/#comment-84931</link> <dc:creator>John Jacob jing hyme</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:01:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3048#comment-84931</guid> <description>only thing i wonder is..if it becomes unofficial, then how safe are we saving our passwords </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only thing i wonder is..if it becomes unofficial, then how safe are we saving our passwords</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark O&#039;Neill</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/25/google-browser-sync-rises-from-the-dead/#comment-84746</link> <dc:creator>Mark O&#039;Neill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:04:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3048#comment-84746</guid> <description>Well....with Google, it&#039;s always a case of &quot;never say never&quot;.   No-one outside Google ever knows what those guys are up to until the day they release something.  One of the things I admire about them is that they are a remarkably disciplined company - you hardly see one of their employees leaking information about a planned product before its scheduled release date. So maybe they will shock us all with a Gbrowser?  You never know. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;.with Google, it&#039;s always a case of &quot;never say never&quot;.   No-one outside Google ever knows what those guys are up to until the day they release something.  One of the things I admire about them is that they are a remarkably disciplined company &#8211; you hardly see one of their employees leaking information about a planned product before its scheduled release date.</p><p>So maybe they will shock us all with a Gbrowser?  You never know.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joel Strellner</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/25/google-browser-sync-rises-from-the-dead/#comment-84704</link> <dc:creator>Joel Strellner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:40:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3048#comment-84704</guid> <description>Sheamus, That browser was released quite a while ago, and in fact they just released a new version.  It&#039;s called Firefox. No seriously, I believe that instead of releasing their own version of a browser they realized that they can get all of the same benefits without the hard work that goes into building a browser just by partnering with Mozilla. I doubt that Google will ever release their gbrowser. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheamus,</p><p>That browser was released quite a while ago, and in fact they just released a new version.  It&#039;s called Firefox.</p><p>No seriously, I believe that instead of releasing their own version of a browser they realized that they can get all of the same benefits without the hard work that goes into building a browser just by partnering with Mozilla.</p><p>I doubt that Google will ever release their gbrowser.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sheamus</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/25/google-browser-sync-rises-from-the-dead/#comment-84408</link> <dc:creator>Sheamus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:57:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3048#comment-84408</guid> <description>Mark, have you heard anything about the long-rumoured gbrowser that Google allegedly starting work on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/Clues-may-point-to-Google-browser/2100-1032_3-5379625.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;few years back&lt;/a&gt;? Four years, to be precise. Could it all have been a wind-up? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, have you heard anything about the long-rumoured gbrowser that Google allegedly starting work on a <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Clues-may-point-to-Google-browser/2100-1032_3-5379625.html" rel="nofollow">few years back</a>?</p><p>Four years, to be precise. Could it all have been a wind-up?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 03:38:41 -->
