<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Could Gmail Become a Corporate Solution?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Thomas Mathew</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-250542</link> <dc:creator>Thomas Mathew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-250542</guid> <description>I am already using Gmail  for office correspondence. There seems to be some problem with  my Outlook and I am much more comfortable with Gmail. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am already using Gmail  for office correspondence. There seems to be some problem with  my Outlook and I am much more comfortable with Gmail.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas Mathew</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-276490</link> <dc:creator>Thomas Mathew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-276490</guid> <description>I am already using Gmail  for office correspondence. There seems to be some problem with  my Outlook and I am much more comfortable with Gmail.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am already using Gmail  for office correspondence. There seems to be some problem with  my Outlook and I am much more comfortable with Gmail.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zibou</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-84174</link> <dc:creator>zibou</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-84174</guid> <description>what about confidentiality ? Will companies accept to deliver (almost) all their information to Google ? I think companies won&#039;t neglect this point when evaluating e-mail solutions. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about confidentiality ?</p><p>Will companies accept to deliver (almost) all their information to Google ?</p><p>I think companies won&#039;t neglect this point when evaluating e-mail solutions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zibou</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-267324</link> <dc:creator>zibou</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-267324</guid> <description>what about confidentiality ?Will companies accept to deliver (almost) all their information to Google ?I think companies won&#039;t neglect this point when evaluating e-mail solutions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about confidentiality ?</p><p>Will companies accept to deliver (almost) all their information to Google ?</p><p>I think companies won&#8217;t neglect this point when evaluating e-mail solutions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-84124</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-84124</guid> <description>Not sure why they don&#039;t think that Labels are any good ... I&#039;m in the process of switching our school here in New Zealand over to Gmail, and everyone&#039;s loving it so far.  If messages are &quot;Archived&quot; so they&#039;re not in the Inbox, the labels work exactly like folders. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why they don&#039;t think that Labels are any good &#8230; I&#039;m in the process of switching our school here in New Zealand over to Gmail, and everyone&#039;s loving it so far.  If messages are &quot;Archived&quot; so they&#039;re not in the Inbox, the labels work exactly like folders.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dave</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-267323</link> <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-267323</guid> <description>Not sure why they don&#039;t think that Labels are any good ... I&#039;m in the process of switching our school here in New Zealand over to Gmail, and everyone&#039;s loving it so far.  If messages are &quot;Archived&quot; so they&#039;re not in the Inbox, the labels work exactly like folders.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why they don&#8217;t think that Labels are any good &#8230; I&#8217;m in the process of switching our school here in New Zealand over to Gmail, and everyone&#8217;s loving it so far.  If messages are &#8220;Archived&#8221; so they&#8217;re not in the Inbox, the labels work exactly like folders.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glen</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-84052</link> <dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-84052</guid> <description>What about the whole Sarbanes Oxley can-o-worms?  Our company is taking the exact opposite tactic, supposedly for compliance reasons.  Soon, we will not be able to save any emails to PST files, and emails on the server will be deleted automatically according to a set schedule. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the whole Sarbanes Oxley can-o-worms?  Our company is taking the exact opposite tactic, supposedly for compliance reasons.  Soon, we will not be able to save any emails to PST files, and emails on the server will be deleted automatically according to a set schedule.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Glen</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-267322</link> <dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-267322</guid> <description>What about the whole Sarbanes Oxley can-o-worms?  Our company is taking the exact opposite tactic, supposedly for compliance reasons.  Soon, we will not be able to save any emails to PST files, and emails on the server will be deleted automatically according to a set schedule.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the whole Sarbanes Oxley can-o-worms?  Our company is taking the exact opposite tactic, supposedly for compliance reasons.  Soon, we will not be able to save any emails to PST files, and emails on the server will be deleted automatically according to a set schedule.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josh</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-267321</link> <dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-267321</guid> <description>Folders are possible with Firefox and &quot;better gmail&quot; greasemonkey script. Or Folders4Gmail: &lt;a href=&quot;http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/8810&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/8810&lt;/a&gt; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folders are possible with Firefox and &quot;better gmail&quot; greasemonkey script.</p><p>Or Folders4Gmail: <a href="http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/8810" rel="nofollow">http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/8810</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-84014</link> <dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-84014</guid> <description>Folders...Folders...Folders... I am a gmail user and Outlook at work. I have heard all the talk from Google how their &quot;tagging&quot; is superior, doesn&#039;t matter, no one at work will accept it. We have tried. They need the folder paradigm to get in at work. If they had folders, it would all be over except for the switch!!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folders&#8230;Folders&#8230;Folders&#8230;</p><p>I am a gmail user and Outlook at work. I have heard all the talk from Google how their &quot;tagging&quot; is superior, doesn&#039;t matter, no one at work will accept it. We have tried. They need the folder paradigm to get in at work.</p><p>If they had folders, it would all be over except for the switch!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-267320</link> <dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-267320</guid> <description>Folders...Folders...Folders...I am a gmail user and Outlook at work. I have heard all the talk from Google how their &quot;tagging&quot; is superior, doesn&#039;t matter, no one at work will accept it. We have tried. They need the folder paradigm to get in at work.If they had folders, it would all be over except for the switch!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folders&#8230;Folders&#8230;Folders&#8230;</p><p>I am a gmail user and Outlook at work. I have heard all the talk from Google how their &#8220;tagging&#8221; is superior, doesn&#8217;t matter, no one at work will accept it. We have tried. They need the folder paradigm to get in at work.</p><p>If they had folders, it would all be over except for the switch!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JR Raphael</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/06/24/could-gmail-become-a-corporate-solution/#comment-84011</link> <dc:creator>JR Raphael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=3020#comment-84011</guid> <description>For what it&#039;s worth, I personally use both Gmail and Outlook myself.  I have my Outlook set up to be synchronized with my Gmail account via IMAP, so I manage my mail there from my primary computer and have things organized the way I like.  If I&#039;m working remotely, though, I can easily access everything through the Gmail web interface, too.  A bit of an involved setup, admittedly, but it works great for what I need. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#039;s worth, I personally use both Gmail and Outlook myself.  I have my Outlook set up to be synchronized with my Gmail account via IMAP, so I manage my mail there from my primary computer and have things organized the way I like.  If I&#039;m working remotely, though, I can easily access everything through the Gmail web interface, too.  A bit of an involved setup, admittedly, but it works great for what I need.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 03:40:01 -->
