Comments on: Villains steal arrogant businessman’s social security number

By: William

William — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 03:08:45 +0000

EPIC FAIL!

By: SomePeople

SomePeople — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:33:48 +0000

Supernatendo clearly doesn’t know what a corporation is or actually does. Davis doesn’t “own” the corporation, if he did it would be whats called a sole proprietorship. He actually did not pay anything out of pocket because the corporation Life Lock (a separate legal entity) covered the fraudulent actions out of the businesses own pocketbook. Dave in no way has unlimited access to Life Lock funds just because he came up with the idea. Your statement “Lifelock is a company he owns so basically, he covered his own payments, he wasn’t covered by anyone…” demonstrates your lack of understanding of the corporate infrastructure. Whether you LIKE it or not Life Lock did in fact cover the entire amount and it did everything that the company claims it does.

But I do love the fact that this cocky douche bag got what was coming. He had to have known SOMEONE was going to make a fool out of him.

By: zero-kill

zero-kill — Thu, 29 May 2008 14:27:12 +0000

Too bad, I was hoping for a little more carnage. With the Driver’s License you could pretty much do whatever you want with his identity in person. I’m surprised that there wasn’t a surge of online credit applications going off.

Either way, niiiice.

By: RichInScottsdale

RichInScottsdale — Wed, 28 May 2008 06:29:42 +0000

John Scherer has been seen around Scottsdale with, well lets just say, some very young felines… Guess fooling the masses has it’s advantages!

By: Supernatendo

Supernatendo — Wed, 28 May 2008 03:40:32 +0000

So in other words, this guy owns lifelock, but it doesn’t work and someone takes out a 500.00 loan on his identity. To keep a good reputation, he goes around claiming lifelock covered the loan payments that were made using his identity. Lifelock is a company he owns so basically, he covered his own payments, he wasn’t covered by anyone, but he gets away with saying Lifelock covered the charges so he doesn’t lose business.

Thats hilarious.

By: DJ

DJ — Wed, 28 May 2008 02:49:50 +0000

What do you expect from a company co-founded by a criminal who came up with the idea while in jail?
Yeah, OK, some of them DO come up with legit ideas. But most of the ones who go in as con artists come out as con artists.

By: John

John — Wed, 28 May 2008 02:39:52 +0000

That was for Checkdafacts by the way.

By: John

John — Wed, 28 May 2008 02:39:21 +0000

So basically, what you are saying is that the Wired article referred in this article is wrong too?

By: Anon

Anon — Wed, 28 May 2008 02:26:52 +0000

“457-55-5462″

Mess with Anon and you get the chopper!

By: checkdafacts

checkdafacts — Wed, 28 May 2008 02:22:30 +0000

Wow. This article was obviously written by someone that doesn’t have the facts. First, Davis wasn’t held liable for the $500 dollar loan; LifeLock covered it as they advertise. Also the loan was opened because payday loan places don’t usually perform credit checks which in turn wouldn’t prompt the fraud alerts. Finally, if you actually read about LifeLock they do provide services that people cannot do for themselves and the ones you can do they perform as a convenience. You always change your own oil and cut your own hair? Seriously, if you want to write articles have the facts.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Wed, 28 May 2008 02:17:55 +0000

Oh, the Humanity! I mean really, now I feel like I did when I realized that “Video Professor” guy was crooked…. sheesh

By: Fen

Fen — Tue, 27 May 2008 20:48:49 +0000

I love justice.