<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blu-Ray vs. DVD: The New Format War?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:00:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lewis B.F</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-179267</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis B.F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-179267</guid>
		<description>Does anyone actually see a difference when comparing dvd and blu ray? I brought a bluray and then next week i returned it as i couldnt see a difference and the blu rays discs cost a lot. I own a 22&quot; HDTV so that is probally the reason but im wandering if anyone else sees a difference? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone actually see a difference when comparing dvd and blu ray? I brought a bluray and then next week i returned it as i couldnt see a difference and the blu rays discs cost a lot. I own a 22&#8243; HDTV so that is probally the reason but im wandering if anyone else sees a difference? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harley</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-172906</link>
		<dc:creator>Harley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-172906</guid>
		<description>Now I&#039;m not saying Blu-Ray ISN&#039;T better quality. But you really do need a huge amount of hardware to take any advantage of it. Something like 40 inches of screen - minimum. That&#039;s going to cost you about £1000, if not more. Then a Blu-Ray player (duh). A decent one of those is another £200. At least. And then of course an improved sound system of at least £500 to take advantage of all of the better sound. And THEN you&#039;re going to have to buy Blu-Ray disks, which cost at least £30 when new, and for that matter, there&#039;s less movies to choose from. And to add to THAT, movies older than a few years will NEVER get that extra super-quality anyway. There are very few people who are willing to spend that much money on a bedroom TV.

Oh, sure, Blu-Ray is backwards compatible and you don&#039;t HAVE to have all that megariffic hardware to get some improvement out of your Blu-Ray player, but if that&#039;s the case you might as well get a regular 21&quot; HDTV and Upscaling DVD player and save yourself a few hundred buckaroonies.

DVD made a HUGE leap in quality for movies, not just for the new movies but also showed capable of improving viewing of the old ones too. You could really see the difference, and not just with two screens frozen side by side either. You could see it in the playing. And there were the various features produced by being in a CD format. And your movies didn&#039;t deterioate just by EXISTING.

Now Blu-Ray makes another improvement, but unlike DVD vs VHS, you DO need a direct comparison. You see it best on a frozen screen, and if you&#039;ve got 13 speakers and a cinema-sized screen, of COURSE you&#039;re going to see a difference - but then you&#039;d see one with DVDs too.

For the movie fanatic in us, with a lot of money to spend and a desire to be absolutely up to date with the best, there&#039;s no reason NOT to upgrade to Blu-Ray - if you don&#039;t mind the fact that when push comes to shove, the majority of your movies will inevitably be upscaled DVDs anyway.

But for the rest of us, which is most of us, since movies are still coming out on DVD, cost less, there are more of them, and the quality difference is negligible, DVD has quite some running distance yet. Those old movies weren&#039;t DESIGNED to be shown on our modern 1080p screens, so there&#039;s a limit to how much better they&#039;re going to look.

And despite Blu-Ray&#039;s success over HD-DVD, with the current economic crisis tightening our belts and constricting our wallets, there&#039;s no guarantee that Blu-Ray will truly win the race against DVD.

After all... does anybody remember the magnificent failure that was mini-discs? Sure, people are buying Blu-Ray players, but you only buy one of those. The REAL money is made in the selling of the movies, and somehow I don&#039;t see people going out and replacing their entire DVD collection with Blu-Ray disks, the way they did with DVDs and VHS.

Nobody&#039;s FORCING you to buy Blu-Ray. We can vote with our wallets, and for once we aren&#039;t going to be losing out substantially by doing so. We CAN show Sony where they can stick their smug new upgrades, and stick with DVDs for a good long while yet.

It&#039;s a maximum outlay for a minimal return. And I think I&#039;ll pass on this upgrade, and wait for Supa-Ray (or whatever the next one is) when I&#039;ll actually be able to SEE a difference between the formats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I&#8217;m not saying Blu-Ray ISN&#8217;T better quality. But you really do need a huge amount of hardware to take any advantage of it. Something like 40 inches of screen &#8211; minimum. That&#8217;s going to cost you about £1000, if not more. Then a Blu-Ray player (duh). A decent one of those is another £200. At least. And then of course an improved sound system of at least £500 to take advantage of all of the better sound. And THEN you&#8217;re going to have to buy Blu-Ray disks, which cost at least £30 when new, and for that matter, there&#8217;s less movies to choose from. And to add to THAT, movies older than a few years will NEVER get that extra super-quality anyway. There are very few people who are willing to spend that much money on a bedroom TV.</p>
<p>Oh, sure, Blu-Ray is backwards compatible and you don&#8217;t HAVE to have all that megariffic hardware to get some improvement out of your Blu-Ray player, but if that&#8217;s the case you might as well get a regular 21&#8243; HDTV and Upscaling DVD player and save yourself a few hundred buckaroonies.</p>
<p>DVD made a HUGE leap in quality for movies, not just for the new movies but also showed capable of improving viewing of the old ones too. You could really see the difference, and not just with two screens frozen side by side either. You could see it in the playing. And there were the various features produced by being in a CD format. And your movies didn&#8217;t deterioate just by EXISTING.</p>
<p>Now Blu-Ray makes another improvement, but unlike DVD vs VHS, you DO need a direct comparison. You see it best on a frozen screen, and if you&#8217;ve got 13 speakers and a cinema-sized screen, of COURSE you&#8217;re going to see a difference &#8211; but then you&#8217;d see one with DVDs too.</p>
<p>For the movie fanatic in us, with a lot of money to spend and a desire to be absolutely up to date with the best, there&#8217;s no reason NOT to upgrade to Blu-Ray &#8211; if you don&#8217;t mind the fact that when push comes to shove, the majority of your movies will inevitably be upscaled DVDs anyway.</p>
<p>But for the rest of us, which is most of us, since movies are still coming out on DVD, cost less, there are more of them, and the quality difference is negligible, DVD has quite some running distance yet. Those old movies weren&#8217;t DESIGNED to be shown on our modern 1080p screens, so there&#8217;s a limit to how much better they&#8217;re going to look.</p>
<p>And despite Blu-Ray&#8217;s success over HD-DVD, with the current economic crisis tightening our belts and constricting our wallets, there&#8217;s no guarantee that Blu-Ray will truly win the race against DVD.</p>
<p>After all&#8230; does anybody remember the magnificent failure that was mini-discs? Sure, people are buying Blu-Ray players, but you only buy one of those. The REAL money is made in the selling of the movies, and somehow I don&#8217;t see people going out and replacing their entire DVD collection with Blu-Ray disks, the way they did with DVDs and VHS.</p>
<p>Nobody&#8217;s FORCING you to buy Blu-Ray. We can vote with our wallets, and for once we aren&#8217;t going to be losing out substantially by doing so. We CAN show Sony where they can stick their smug new upgrades, and stick with DVDs for a good long while yet.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a maximum outlay for a minimal return. And I think I&#8217;ll pass on this upgrade, and wait for Supa-Ray (or whatever the next one is) when I&#8217;ll actually be able to SEE a difference between the formats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Simmonds</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-164845</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Simmonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-164845</guid>
		<description>A lot of the comments here seem to be talking about the exorbitant price and the negligible benefits, and I find a lot of fallacy in many of the arguments. Yes, it&#039;s true that with a 20&#039; SDTV and internal speakers with a DVD player attached you&#039;re looking at a lot of upgrade, but that&#039;s looking at it from a vacuum.

As things get replaced, it gives new incentive to upgrade complimentary hardware. I remember when Lord of the Rings came out, my father finally decided it was time to get a DVD player (~100). The difference in picture quality was amazing, but the sound was lacking, so after a couple of years, we sprang for a midrange 5.1 system (~$500). The difference in sound was incredible. Now, a few years later, we finally decided prices had dropped enough and purchased an HDTV, a 42&#039; 1080P LCD on sale (~$650). We spent a little more for HD access from our satellite provider and even my incredible skeptical mother was made a convert in a matter of seconds watching Planet Earth in 1080i with Dolby Digital 5.1 (HDTV channels are generally in surround). Yes, that&#039;s $1250 spent over a few years for entertainment to keep up with the general progression of technology, but every individual step of the way has been worth the cost 150%. Now I&#039;ve finally purchased a blu-ray player after looking around and getting a good deal for $160 on a refurbished Panasonic BD35. We aren&#039;t extraordinarily well off in my family, we certainly don&#039;t &quot;need&quot; these things (we live in a warm state and spend much of our time outside), but the difference is staggering with each technological step we take, and well worth the price to make entertainment that much better. Yes, even as my BRD player comes by mail, my father still insists that DVD is &quot;fine&quot; (the same way SDTV and 2 channel sound was fine), but I know it&#039;ll only take a few minutes of watching Prince Caspian in 1080P to convince him.

That&#039;s what any skeptic here should do. Go see for yourself on a good sized screen (I&#039;ve found 42&#039;to be the point at which 1080P begins to become noticeable) with a good surround sound setup and see just how dramatic the difference is. I&#039;m mostly a National Geographic or History Channel type guy, and only intermittently into high-octane movies and the like, but HD really allows one to connect with their entertainment in a way never-before possible outside of the theater. Given the $10 it costs these days for a movie ticket anyways, I&#039;ll spend the cash to have the theater at home. You don&#039;t have to blow your life&#039;s saving right off either. Just buy things as prices drop. Blu-ray is fairly new. It&#039;s just getting on its feet. DVDs and players were just as expensive at this stage (if not more so). Still, a rather nice HDTV can be had for WELL under $1000 these days (and even under $500 for slightly smaller sets in the 32&#039; range). If you really want to dive in, just start with that and get some basic HD service through your television provider. Where we are, a basic HD package can be had for $30 a month through satellite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of the comments here seem to be talking about the exorbitant price and the negligible benefits, and I find a lot of fallacy in many of the arguments. Yes, it&#8217;s true that with a 20&#8242; SDTV and internal speakers with a DVD player attached you&#8217;re looking at a lot of upgrade, but that&#8217;s looking at it from a vacuum.</p>
<p>As things get replaced, it gives new incentive to upgrade complimentary hardware. I remember when Lord of the Rings came out, my father finally decided it was time to get a DVD player (~100). The difference in picture quality was amazing, but the sound was lacking, so after a couple of years, we sprang for a midrange 5.1 system (~$500). The difference in sound was incredible. Now, a few years later, we finally decided prices had dropped enough and purchased an HDTV, a 42&#8242; 1080P LCD on sale (~$650). We spent a little more for HD access from our satellite provider and even my incredible skeptical mother was made a convert in a matter of seconds watching Planet Earth in 1080i with Dolby Digital 5.1 (HDTV channels are generally in surround). Yes, that&#8217;s $1250 spent over a few years for entertainment to keep up with the general progression of technology, but every individual step of the way has been worth the cost 150%. Now I&#8217;ve finally purchased a blu-ray player after looking around and getting a good deal for $160 on a refurbished Panasonic BD35. We aren&#8217;t extraordinarily well off in my family, we certainly don&#8217;t &#8220;need&#8221; these things (we live in a warm state and spend much of our time outside), but the difference is staggering with each technological step we take, and well worth the price to make entertainment that much better. Yes, even as my BRD player comes by mail, my father still insists that DVD is &#8220;fine&#8221; (the same way SDTV and 2 channel sound was fine), but I know it&#8217;ll only take a few minutes of watching Prince Caspian in 1080P to convince him.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what any skeptic here should do. Go see for yourself on a good sized screen (I&#8217;ve found 42&#8242;to be the point at which 1080P begins to become noticeable) with a good surround sound setup and see just how dramatic the difference is. I&#8217;m mostly a National Geographic or History Channel type guy, and only intermittently into high-octane movies and the like, but HD really allows one to connect with their entertainment in a way never-before possible outside of the theater. Given the $10 it costs these days for a movie ticket anyways, I&#8217;ll spend the cash to have the theater at home. You don&#8217;t have to blow your life&#8217;s saving right off either. Just buy things as prices drop. Blu-ray is fairly new. It&#8217;s just getting on its feet. DVDs and players were just as expensive at this stage (if not more so). Still, a rather nice HDTV can be had for WELL under $1000 these days (and even under $500 for slightly smaller sets in the 32&#8242; range). If you really want to dive in, just start with that and get some basic HD service through your television provider. Where we are, a basic HD package can be had for $30 a month through satellite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Movie buff</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-162416</link>
		<dc:creator>Movie buff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-162416</guid>
		<description>Look I kind of understand where you guys are coming from cause I thought the same till I was educated at a friend’s house…….meaning once I saw his LCD playing a blu-ray in 1080P I was hooked, if you guys want to lie to yourselves saying you don’t see much of a difference than by all means go ahead but anyone that has decent vision and hearing can see a clear crisp difference, I for one am a collector or movies it’s my hobby so spending a little coin on it doesn’t kill me when I see a beautiful picture that spanks even the local movie theater. My old dvd’s are not usless and I will not be replacing them but I do go on amazon and buy used blu-rays for the same price I would have normally bought a dvd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look I kind of understand where you guys are coming from cause I thought the same till I was educated at a friend’s house…….meaning once I saw his LCD playing a blu-ray in 1080P I was hooked, if you guys want to lie to yourselves saying you don’t see much of a difference than by all means go ahead but anyone that has decent vision and hearing can see a clear crisp difference, I for one am a collector or movies it’s my hobby so spending a little coin on it doesn’t kill me when I see a beautiful picture that spanks even the local movie theater. My old dvd’s are not usless and I will not be replacing them but I do go on amazon and buy used blu-rays for the same price I would have normally bought a dvd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-154602</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 13:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-154602</guid>
		<description>I think Blu-ray is fantastic. I am not fanatical about movies, but I do enjoy them. But let me put things into a clear picture...

first of all the prices have come down. In the UK you can buy blu ray starting at £8.00 for movies such as War to 3:10 yuma. I bought superbad on blu-ray new and the same store sold it dvd new the same price (which was £8.00). Yes some cost more, but shop around online also, you will be surprised. 

So is this too much to spend? Well if you go to the movies then no! You pay to go to the movies, the price of one seat is a price of almost a blu-ray movie!

I understand you need a HD tv first. Okay well if you need to replace your old one when it packs up like I did, I felt good, but I only got it because I was living in a small room and had no space for a big old style. 

If you want to wait, wait because it will drop a little more, especially the players. Do hunt for bargains for the movies, they are priced from £8.00 in the UK at least. I use my PC to watch on my tv DVI to HDMI so no loss of quality (You need a graphics card which can do this though) and I only spent £57 on the blu-ray player which also burns and plays DVDs, CDs.

I hope this opens your eyes a little. But if you want to save every penny then DVD&#039;s you can buy £3 each on sales and even then, every penny counts right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Blu-ray is fantastic. I am not fanatical about movies, but I do enjoy them. But let me put things into a clear picture&#8230;</p>
<p>first of all the prices have come down. In the UK you can buy blu ray starting at £8.00 for movies such as War to 3:10 yuma. I bought superbad on blu-ray new and the same store sold it dvd new the same price (which was £8.00). Yes some cost more, but shop around online also, you will be surprised. </p>
<p>So is this too much to spend? Well if you go to the movies then no! You pay to go to the movies, the price of one seat is a price of almost a blu-ray movie!</p>
<p>I understand you need a HD tv first. Okay well if you need to replace your old one when it packs up like I did, I felt good, but I only got it because I was living in a small room and had no space for a big old style. </p>
<p>If you want to wait, wait because it will drop a little more, especially the players. Do hunt for bargains for the movies, they are priced from £8.00 in the UK at least. I use my PC to watch on my tv DVI to HDMI so no loss of quality (You need a graphics card which can do this though) and I only spent £57 on the blu-ray player which also burns and plays DVDs, CDs.</p>
<p>I hope this opens your eyes a little. But if you want to save every penny then DVD&#8217;s you can buy £3 each on sales and even then, every penny counts right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WVHagan</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-153774</link>
		<dc:creator>WVHagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 01:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-153774</guid>
		<description>Well, aparently there are software issues with windows, Blu-ray and such.  The Blu-ray works on the laptop, however, when the HDMI cable is used, error codes etc. come up.  So, I found out that while a laptop plays Blu-ray discs, that doesn&#039;t mean it is a portable Blu-ray player to hook into a television.  It seems that the Blu-ray technology is a little more involved than a DVD.  I didn&#039;t realize that Blu-ray players require software updates from time to time.  For now I have decided to wait before jumping into Blu-ray.  Another consideration is when the movie was originally filmed.  I bought a Blu-ray copy of Twister.  It wasn&#039;t filmed with the newest technology, being at least 10 to 15 years old.  It is not going to look as good as some Blu-ray discs that were filmed in HD, or so I am told.  At Best Buy they played a Blue-ray disc on the same 26&quot; HD 720p lcd television I have, and I&#039;m not sure how much of a difference BR made.  I didn&#039;t see the same movie on DVD beside the BR to compare the two.  Where I live, BR discs are not nearly as available as DVDs, the added complexity of the software is a pain, and the fact that the BR movie I saw on the same television I own looked good but wasn&#039;t stunning...well...I haven&#039;t fallen in love with BR quite yet.  If I had a large 1080p television, BR would be far more tempting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, aparently there are software issues with windows, Blu-ray and such.  The Blu-ray works on the laptop, however, when the HDMI cable is used, error codes etc. come up.  So, I found out that while a laptop plays Blu-ray discs, that doesn&#8217;t mean it is a portable Blu-ray player to hook into a television.  It seems that the Blu-ray technology is a little more involved than a DVD.  I didn&#8217;t realize that Blu-ray players require software updates from time to time.  For now I have decided to wait before jumping into Blu-ray.  Another consideration is when the movie was originally filmed.  I bought a Blu-ray copy of Twister.  It wasn&#8217;t filmed with the newest technology, being at least 10 to 15 years old.  It is not going to look as good as some Blu-ray discs that were filmed in HD, or so I am told.  At Best Buy they played a Blue-ray disc on the same 26&#8243; HD 720p lcd television I have, and I&#8217;m not sure how much of a difference BR made.  I didn&#8217;t see the same movie on DVD beside the BR to compare the two.  Where I live, BR discs are not nearly as available as DVDs, the added complexity of the software is a pain, and the fact that the BR movie I saw on the same television I own looked good but wasn&#8217;t stunning&#8230;well&#8230;I haven&#8217;t fallen in love with BR quite yet.  If I had a large 1080p television, BR would be far more tempting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WVHagan</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-150024</link>
		<dc:creator>WVHagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-150024</guid>
		<description>I just purchased a lap top and it has a Blu-ray player with an HDMI port on it.  I didn&#039;t really want a blu-ray player on it, but it was there.  I bought a Blue-ray disc of Cars, I have it on DVD, and a 12&#039; HDMI cord.  I can&#039;t wait to try it out to see if Blu-ray makes much of a difference on a 26&quot; 720p television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just purchased a lap top and it has a Blu-ray player with an HDMI port on it.  I didn&#8217;t really want a blu-ray player on it, but it was there.  I bought a Blue-ray disc of Cars, I have it on DVD, and a 12&#8242; HDMI cord.  I can&#8217;t wait to try it out to see if Blu-ray makes much of a difference on a 26&#8243; 720p television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WVHagan</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-130268</link>
		<dc:creator>WVHagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-130268</guid>
		<description>CNET has posted an interesting article giving 9 reasons Blu-ray will succeed.  Among their predictions are falling prices.  I think that is the key.  It is all cost/benefit to me.  Yesterday I was at Walmart and I saw some Blu-ray discs for $13.00, so that seems doable.  I also purchased an upconverting DVD player two days ago.  It does improve a regular DVD significantly, but flaws are still visible.  When Blue-ray players hit a certain price-point, and Block Busters in our area start carrying Blu-ray discs, then I figure I&#039;ll probably go to Blue-ray.  That sure does not mean replacing my movies on DVD with Blu-ray versions.  
     I will disagree with the person who said that basically only older or crappy grade-B movies are inexpensive DVDs.  I&#039;ve seen newer movies that are fantastic, such as WE WERE SOLDIERS, for as little as $5.00.  That being said, if CNET is correct, and they probably are, in a few years I&#039;ll have a Blue-ray player too.  The fact that Blu-ray has backward compatiblity makes it all the more attractive.  I don&#039;t have to forsake my DVD collection.  If I am seeming to switch sides..it just means I&#039;m open to new data.   Anyway, I don&#039;t have a dog in this fight.  It is just very intersting and enjoyable to consider all opinions and mull over ideas.  Perhaps this is the 21rst century equivalent to a bunch of guys gathering at the old general store, sitting around discussing ideas (bull********).  Yes, I&#039;m one of those who has to be pulled into the tweny-first century kicking and screaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNET has posted an interesting article giving 9 reasons Blu-ray will succeed.  Among their predictions are falling prices.  I think that is the key.  It is all cost/benefit to me.  Yesterday I was at Walmart and I saw some Blu-ray discs for $13.00, so that seems doable.  I also purchased an upconverting DVD player two days ago.  It does improve a regular DVD significantly, but flaws are still visible.  When Blue-ray players hit a certain price-point, and Block Busters in our area start carrying Blu-ray discs, then I figure I&#8217;ll probably go to Blue-ray.  That sure does not mean replacing my movies on DVD with Blu-ray versions.<br />
     I will disagree with the person who said that basically only older or crappy grade-B movies are inexpensive DVDs.  I&#8217;ve seen newer movies that are fantastic, such as WE WERE SOLDIERS, for as little as $5.00.  That being said, if CNET is correct, and they probably are, in a few years I&#8217;ll have a Blue-ray player too.  The fact that Blu-ray has backward compatiblity makes it all the more attractive.  I don&#8217;t have to forsake my DVD collection.  If I am seeming to switch sides..it just means I&#8217;m open to new data.   Anyway, I don&#8217;t have a dog in this fight.  It is just very intersting and enjoyable to consider all opinions and mull over ideas.  Perhaps this is the 21rst century equivalent to a bunch of guys gathering at the old general store, sitting around discussing ideas (bull********).  Yes, I&#8217;m one of those who has to be pulled into the tweny-first century kicking and screaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P J F</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-130247</link>
		<dc:creator>P J F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-130247</guid>
		<description>P.S At least Blockbusters in Bristol are in the 21st century and DO stock all the latest Blu-ray&#039;s (Just for the record) ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S At least Blockbusters in Bristol are in the 21st century and DO stock all the latest Blu-ray&#8217;s (Just for the record) ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P J F</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-130245</link>
		<dc:creator>P J F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-130245</guid>
		<description>It makes me laugh, everyone I know wants/buys a HDTV. Yet none of them appreciate Blu-Ray or any other HD services on offer. 

(Most claiming they can&#039;t see the difference between standard DVD and a Blu-ray. Which just makes me think they are actually going blind or is it they are blind to new technology? ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes me laugh, everyone I know wants/buys a HDTV. Yet none of them appreciate Blu-Ray or any other HD services on offer. </p>
<p>(Most claiming they can&#8217;t see the difference between standard DVD and a Blu-ray. Which just makes me think they are actually going blind or is it they are blind to new technology? ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WVHagan</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-129502</link>
		<dc:creator>WVHagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-129502</guid>
		<description>Another sign that Blu-ray has not yet quite made it is that our local Block Buster Video stores have so far made a decision not to carry Blu-ray discs.  I talked to the manager and he said that there is just not the market.  When Block Buster Video stores begin to get into Blu-ray in a big way then that is a sign that DVDs are headed the way of CRTs and the dinosaurs.  Our local Block Buster stores still have some VHS tapes.  Besides price, that is another disincentive to jumping into Blu-ray.  If Blu-ray eventually dominates the market, that is not bad.  Prices will fall and we can still watch our old DVDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another sign that Blu-ray has not yet quite made it is that our local Block Buster Video stores have so far made a decision not to carry Blu-ray discs.  I talked to the manager and he said that there is just not the market.  When Block Buster Video stores begin to get into Blu-ray in a big way then that is a sign that DVDs are headed the way of CRTs and the dinosaurs.  Our local Block Buster stores still have some VHS tapes.  Besides price, that is another disincentive to jumping into Blu-ray.  If Blu-ray eventually dominates the market, that is not bad.  Prices will fall and we can still watch our old DVDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WVHagan</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/14/blu-ray-vs-dvd-the-new-format-war/#comment-129312</link>
		<dc:creator>WVHagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2593#comment-129312</guid>
		<description>I guess they are getting there.  Are Blu-ray players as good at up-converting regular DVDs as, say, something like a Toshiba XDE-500?  When my current DVD player, a Yamaha, gives up the ghost it might be something to consider. BTW, when it was new, my Yamaha DVD player retailed for over $300.  You can find a Blu-ray player for less than that.  I can&#039;t see replacing my favorite DVDs with Blu-ray discs the way I replaced a lot of my VHS tapes with DVDs.  The thing that is most likely to cause a mass migration from DVD to Blu-ray is when and if studios start putting out movies on Blu-ray that are not available on DVD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess they are getting there.  Are Blu-ray players as good at up-converting regular DVDs as, say, something like a Toshiba XDE-500?  When my current DVD player, a Yamaha, gives up the ghost it might be something to consider. BTW, when it was new, my Yamaha DVD player retailed for over $300.  You can find a Blu-ray player for less than that.  I can&#8217;t see replacing my favorite DVDs with Blu-ray discs the way I replaced a lot of my VHS tapes with DVDs.  The thing that is most likely to cause a mass migration from DVD to Blu-ray is when and if studios start putting out movies on Blu-ray that are not available on DVD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
