http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/13/nsa-cyber-wargames-showcases-nsa-takedown-potential/ tech, science, news and social issues for geeks Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/13/nsa-cyber-wargames-showcases-nsa-takedown-potential/#comment-68409 Justin Hilyard Wed, 14 May 2008 09:02:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2582#comment-68409 That says that they have the legal authority to attack any US network, and possibly even just that they have the legal authority to attack any network associated with the US government and military. The way your blurb sounded, before getting to the article myself I thought you meant they were legally authorized to order any network in the US, private or governmental, to shut down, which is a much scarier prospect to me. That says that they have the legal authority to attack any US network, and possibly even just that they have the legal authority to attack any network associated with the US government and military. The way your blurb sounded, before getting to the article myself I thought you meant they were legally authorized to order any network in the US, private or governmental, to shut down, which is a much scarier prospect to me.

]]> http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/13/nsa-cyber-wargames-showcases-nsa-takedown-potential/#comment-266569 Justin Hilyard Wed, 14 May 2008 09:02:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2582#comment-266569 That says that they have the legal authority to attack any US network, and possibly even just that they have the legal authority to attack any network associated with the US government and military. The way your blurb sounded, before getting to the article myself I thought you meant they were legally authorized to order any network in the US, private or governmental, to shut down, which is a much scarier prospect to me. That says that they have the legal authority to attack any US network, and possibly even just that they have the legal authority to attack any network associated with the US government and military. The way your blurb sounded, before getting to the article myself I thought you meant they were legally authorized to order any network in the US, private or governmental, to shut down, which is a much scarier prospect to me.

]]>