<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Xobni: Email Made Easier Than Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/08/xobni-email-made-easier-than-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/08/xobni-email-made-easier-than-ever/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/08/xobni-email-made-easier-than-ever/#comment-68306</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2529#comment-68306</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link. I tried Xobni for a few days. The analytics are very cool. They definitely appeal to my inner geek. However, the performance of Xobni isn't great. (Yes, I know it's in Beta.) Outlook startup time is drastically slower, and Outlook runs slower during general use. (My setup is Vista SP1 + Outlook 2007 SP1.) Also, the search feature doesn't integrate with the "Search Inbox" feature in Outlook 2007. This is disappointing given how slow the MS search engine is. It's probably an Outlook limitation, but the lack of integration limits the usefulness of Xobni. I uninstalled it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Thanks for the link. I tried Xobni for a few days. The analytics are very cool. They definitely appeal to my inner geek. However, the performance of Xobni isn&#8217;t great. (Yes, I know it&#8217;s in Beta.) Outlook startup time is drastically slower, and Outlook runs slower during general use. (My setup is Vista SP1 + Outlook 2007 SP1.) Also, the search feature doesn&#8217;t integrate with the &#8220;Search Inbox&#8221; feature in Outlook 2007. This is disappointing given how slow the MS search engine is. It&#8217;s probably an Outlook limitation, but the lack of integration limits the usefulness of Xobni. I uninstalled it.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiltak</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/08/xobni-email-made-easier-than-ever/#comment-67438</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiltak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2529#comment-67438</guid>
		<description>Just listen to the demo clip:

http://www.xobni.com/learnmore/

K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Just listen to the demo clip:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.xobni.com/learnmore/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xobni.com/learnmore/</a></p>
<p>K.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noematic.logos</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/08/xobni-email-made-easier-than-ever/#comment-67437</link>
		<dc:creator>noematic.logos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2529#comment-67437</guid>
		<description>typical answer, spend more money and get an even bigger, [insert technology here] solution, well I don't have a 22" monitor as my computing solution is a 15" laptop, and not everyone can afford to upgrade hardware every time a new widget is released. And answers like "its awesome" tell us nothing about what *is* actually awesome. I was commenting on the information in the review, so please, share your knowledge with us and illuminate us as to why we need this sidebar beyond what is contained within this article.  Just because M$ wants to buy it, doesn't make it revolutionary or groundbreaking, since M$ has done that with hundreds of companies and products that have done little to improve the Windows user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">typical answer, spend more money and get an even bigger, [insert technology here] solution, well I don&#8217;t have a 22&#8243; monitor as my computing solution is a 15&#8243; laptop, and not everyone can afford to upgrade hardware every time a new widget is released. And answers like &#8220;its awesome&#8221; tell us nothing about what *is* actually awesome. I was commenting on the information in the review, so please, share your knowledge with us and illuminate us as to why we need this sidebar beyond what is contained within this article.  Just because M$ wants to buy it, doesn&#8217;t make it revolutionary or groundbreaking, since M$ has done that with hundreds of companies and products that have done little to improve the Windows user experience.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiltak</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/08/xobni-email-made-easier-than-ever/#comment-67430</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiltak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2529#comment-67430</guid>
		<description>Well, on a 22" widescreen monitor, the sidebar doesn't waste any space at all... There's a reason why Microsoft tried to buy the company who made this several times.. it's simply awesome..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Well, on a 22&#8243; widescreen monitor, the sidebar doesn&#8217;t waste any space at all&#8230; There&#8217;s a reason why Microsoft tried to buy the company who made this several times.. it&#8217;s simply awesome..</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noemtic.logos</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/08/xobni-email-made-easier-than-ever/#comment-67428</link>
		<dc:creator>noemtic.logos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2529#comment-67428</guid>
		<description>If you use Gmail, you must install the 'Better Gmail 2' extension for Firefox.  Beyond that, it is super easy to find ALL attachments by making a filter and label for...wait for it....'a t t a c h m e n t s'.  So, an email comes in with an attachment and the label 'attachment' is added to it, then when you want to find an attachment you can just click the associated label.  While I think it is super wizbang to have a sidebar of various statistics and demographics about my contacts, I can't think of many scenarios where that amount of wasted screen space is going to be useful for much.  Who cares about the frequency distribution of times of day when a contact sent you emails?? One of those situations where because you can, doesn't make it useful.  Statistics are easy to generate, providing meaningful ones at the correct time is an art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">If you use Gmail, you must install the &#8216;Better Gmail 2&#8242; extension for Firefox.  Beyond that, it is super easy to find ALL attachments by making a filter and label for&#8230;wait for it&#8230;.&#8217;a t t a c h m e n t s&#8217;.  So, an email comes in with an attachment and the label &#8216;attachment&#8217; is added to it, then when you want to find an attachment you can just click the associated label.  While I think it is super wizbang to have a sidebar of various statistics and demographics about my contacts, I can&#8217;t think of many scenarios where that amount of wasted screen space is going to be useful for much.  Who cares about the frequency distribution of times of day when a contact sent you emails?? One of those situations where because you can, doesn&#8217;t make it useful.  Statistics are easy to generate, providing meaningful ones at the correct time is an art.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiltak</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/08/xobni-email-made-easier-than-ever/#comment-67426</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiltak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2529#comment-67426</guid>
		<description>Hmm John, I'm using on Outlook 2003 / XP and it works perfectly.. Have you installed the latest built?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Hmm John, I&#8217;m using on Outlook 2003 / XP and it works perfectly.. Have you installed the latest built?</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/05/08/xobni-email-made-easier-than-ever/#comment-67409</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2529#comment-67409</guid>
		<description>"The program supports Outlook 2003 or 2007 running on XP or Vista."

er no, it doesn't. 

we trialled this internally, anyone using outlook 2003 or xp and it killed outlook as soon as they recieved an incoming email, hence we ditched it. though i believe one vista running office 2007 colleague still uses it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">&#8220;The program supports Outlook 2003 or 2007 running on XP or Vista.&#8221;</p>
<p>er no, it doesn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>we trialled this internally, anyone using outlook 2003 or xp and it killed outlook as soon as they recieved an incoming email, hence we ditched it. though i believe one vista running office 2007 colleague still uses it..</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.505 seconds -->
