<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Imagineering the Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/04/15/imagineering-the-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/04/15/imagineering-the-spam/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:29:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: figsandmice</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/04/15/imagineering-the-spam/#comment-59487</link>
		<dc:creator>figsandmice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2390#comment-59487</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly what I was thinking, although I&#039;ll probably read this comic since Spamusement seems to be dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly what I was thinking, although I&#8217;ll probably read this comic since Spamusement seems to be dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Hilyard</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/04/15/imagineering-the-spam/#comment-59429</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Hilyard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/?p=2390#comment-59429</guid>
		<description>As much as I hate to accuse someone, this seems like it&#039;s just a ripoff of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spamusement.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Spamusement&lt;/a&gt;.  Not to say that I don&#039;t miss it and appreciate the concept revival, since he hasn&#039;t updated in almost a year, but he was doing this exact same thing for over 2 years starting back in 2004.  It wasn&#039;t anything hidden away in a corner of the internet either, Spamusement was at least moderately well-known for it.  Yet I don&#039;t see even an acknowledgment on A Spam A Day to him.  Seems kind of lame of him, honestly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I hate to accuse someone, this seems like it&#8217;s just a ripoff of <a href="http://www.spamusement.com/" rel="nofollow">Spamusement</a>.  Not to say that I don&#8217;t miss it and appreciate the concept revival, since he hasn&#8217;t updated in almost a year, but he was doing this exact same thing for over 2 years starting back in 2004.  It wasn&#8217;t anything hidden away in a corner of the internet either, Spamusement was at least moderately well-known for it.  Yet I don&#8217;t see even an acknowledgment on A Spam A Day to him.  Seems kind of lame of him, honestly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
