<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Microsoft offers to buy Yahoo! for $44.6 billion</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-buy-yahoo-for-446-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-buy-yahoo-for-446-billion/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Jalaj</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-buy-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-43595</link> <dc:creator>Jalaj</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 03:01:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-buy-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-43595</guid> <description>How much money does Microsoft have. At least I could not have imagined it buying Yahoo! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much money does Microsoft have. At least I could not have imagined it buying Yahoo!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chuck norris jokes</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-buy-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-43409</link> <dc:creator>chuck norris jokes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:58:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-buy-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-43409</guid> <description>This could be a good year for us. If they actually merge, then Google won&#039;t be able to be a bully like before. It&#039;s always good for the customers there&#039;s some competition, of course. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be a good year for us. If they actually merge, then Google won&#039;t be able to be a bully like before.</p><p>It&#039;s always good for the customers there&#039;s some competition, of course.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack Payne</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-buy-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-43407</link> <dc:creator>Jack Payne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:51:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-buy-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-43407</guid> <description>I&#039;ve been wondering when such a marriage would take place.  It&#039;s long overdue, and everyone knows how badly Microsoft wants to beat out Google for search mastery. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been wondering when such a marriage would take place.  It&#039;s long overdue, and everyone knows how badly Microsoft wants to beat out Google for search mastery.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HiFi Guy</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-buy-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-43357</link> <dc:creator>HiFi Guy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:23:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/02/01/microsoft-offers-to-buy-yahoo-for-446-billion/#comment-43357</guid> <description>I hope the will buy yahoo and then beat google :p </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope the will buy yahoo and then beat google :p</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 08:00:57 -->
