<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Worst of Digg.com</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: chuck norris jokes</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-43408</link> <dc:creator>chuck norris jokes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:56:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-43408</guid> <description>Actually, it&#039;s pretty easy to post whatever you want. I know a guy that posts regularly there to get some traffic on his blogspot blogs whenever something new comes along. People will not delete the post, it will stay there. For sure. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#039;s pretty easy to post whatever you want. I know a guy that posts regularly there to get some traffic on his blogspot blogs whenever something new comes along.</p><p>People will not delete the post, it will stay there. For sure.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Verdican</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42969</link> <dc:creator>Verdican</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:10:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42969</guid> <description>I&#039;m actually surprised that some people at Digg see ads. I&#039;ve always though of the Digg crowd as &#039;highly technical&#039;, and am extremely surprised that there are some users who don&#039;t use NoScript or Adblock Plus. I think that Digg&#039;s traffic is slowly declining. There were a few revolts over there due to the &quot;Get a free iPod ads!&quot; as well as the recent change in the algorithm. It seems more and more people are going over to Mixx and Reddit. But with these ads, who would blame them? I certainly don&#039;t want to see animated pimples when I&#039;m digging an article (Not that I do of course. I&#039;ve got Adblock Plus.) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m actually surprised that some people at Digg see ads. I&#039;ve always though of the Digg crowd as &#039;highly technical&#039;, and am extremely surprised that there are some users who don&#039;t use NoScript or Adblock Plus.</p><p>I think that Digg&#039;s traffic is slowly declining. There were a few revolts over there due to the &quot;Get a free iPod ads!&quot; as well as the recent change in the algorithm. It seems more and more people are going over to Mixx and Reddit. But with these ads, who would blame them? I certainly don&#039;t want to see animated pimples when I&#039;m digging an article (Not that I do of course. I&#039;ve got Adblock Plus.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anthony Lawrence</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42900</link> <dc:creator>Anthony Lawrence</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:10:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42900</guid> <description>&quot;lonely, pimple-faced idiots?&quot; Well, if the shoe fits.. no, I&#039;m joking. But Digg is becoming irrelevant.   Most of us don&#039;t care any more.  It&#039;s possible that they might recover if they can figure out an algorithm that honestly gauges good content without being able to be gamed, but that&#039;s tough to do.  How on earth can you algorithmically tell the difference between an honest digger promoting good content and another digger promoting their friends pages?  I don&#039;t see how you possibly can. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;lonely, pimple-faced idiots?&quot;</p><p>Well, if the shoe fits.. no, I&#039;m joking.</p><p>But Digg is becoming irrelevant.   Most of us don&#039;t care any more.  It&#039;s possible that they might recover if they can figure out an algorithm that honestly gauges good content without being able to be gamed, but that&#039;s tough to do.  How on earth can you algorithmically tell the difference between an honest digger promoting good content and another digger promoting their friends pages?  I don&#039;t see how you possibly can.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BelchSpeak</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42885</link> <dc:creator>BelchSpeak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:30:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42885</guid> <description>I used to rely on Digg to get a feel for what&#039;s hot on the Internet until I noticed that they tend to have a lefty bias and more prone to hysterics than 12 year old girls.  I don&#039;t go there much anymore. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to rely on Digg to get a feel for what&#039;s hot on the Internet until I noticed that they tend to have a lefty bias and more prone to hysterics than 12 year old girls.  I don&#039;t go there much anymore.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kiltak</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42882</link> <dc:creator>Kiltak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:09:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42882</guid> <description>@Mike: Hmmm, you abviously have never submitted something to digg, else you wouldn&#039;t be saying that. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike: Hmmm, you abviously have never submitted something to digg, else you wouldn&#039;t be saying that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42874</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42874</guid> <description>The problem is it is too easy to post stories to Digg. You can automatically get something on there any time you post a blog entry. This makes it super easy for spammers to post  their spam. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is it is too easy to post stories to Digg. You can automatically get something on there any time you post a blog entry. This makes it super easy for spammers to post  their spam.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kiltak</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42863</link> <dc:creator>Kiltak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:18:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42863</guid> <description>Maybe not with their users, but they get massive traffic from search engines.. that&#039;s where the money is. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe not with their users, but they get massive traffic from search engines.. that&#039;s where the money is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Obbop</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42862</link> <dc:creator>Obbop</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:15:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42862</guid> <description>I like the one for oozing pustule cream. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the one for oozing pustule cream.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed Kohler</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42860</link> <dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:14:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42860</guid> <description>It must be tricky for Digg to make much off advertising since their readers are so web savvy. Ever notice how few Digg readers click on ads when you get dugg? I imagine it&#039;s like that every day for them. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be tricky for Digg to make much off advertising since their readers are so web savvy. Ever notice how few Digg readers click on ads when you get dugg? I imagine it&#039;s like that every day for them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42858</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:06:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42858</guid> <description>Digg&#039;s advertising partner is Microsoft: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2007/jul07/07-25DiggPR.mspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2007/jul...&lt;/a&gt; So what do you expect, these ads are typical of their low-quality approach to everything, especially here as they are playing catch up to Google, they&#039;re just accepting any old crap that advertisers want to put on their network. Great job MS. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg&#039;s advertising partner is Microsoft:</p><p> <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2007/jul07/07-25DiggPR.mspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2007/jul&#8230;</a></p><p>So what do you expect, these ads are typical of their low-quality approach to everything, especially here as they are playing catch up to Google, they&#039;re just accepting any old crap that advertisers want to put on their network. Great job MS.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TN</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42856</link> <dc:creator>TN</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:04:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/31/the-worst-of-diggcom/#comment-42856</guid> <description>I&#039;ve noticed a decline in the ads at Digg, actually.  I was quite disappointed the time I heard the classic &quot;Congratulations! You are eligible to receive a free iPod&quot; or whatever it says.  Plus, the ones above are naaasty. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve noticed a decline in the ads at Digg, actually.  I was quite disappointed the time I heard the classic &quot;Congratulations! You are eligible to receive a free iPod&quot; or whatever it says.  Plus, the ones above are naaasty.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-13 19:02:49 -->
