<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Thinner and Cheaper Alternative to the Macbook Air</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:58:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-114547</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-114547</guid>
		<description>You forget, in addition, the macbook hard drive can be erased and reused over and over again for its life cycle. Meaning, for the equivalent on paper, you either need a lot of white-out, erasers, or just replacement reams, which increases costs to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forget, in addition, the macbook hard drive can be erased and reused over and over again for its life cycle. Meaning, for the equivalent on paper, you either need a lot of white-out, erasers, or just replacement reams, which increases costs to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-49841</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 02:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-49841</guid>
		<description>We joke now but one day....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We joke now but one day&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loogibot</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-46399</link>
		<dc:creator>Loogibot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-46399</guid>
		<description>2 or 3 foot tall stack of paper is still cheaper. For $5 a ream, by my place, I&#039;d save so much more than buying an &quot;Air&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 or 3 foot tall stack of paper is still cheaper. For $5 a ream, by my place, I&#8217;d save so much more than buying an &#8220;Air&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kilian</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-45971</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-45971</guid>
		<description>The same for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42958</link>
		<dc:creator>brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 02:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42958</guid>
		<description>If we want to split hairs, a couple of reams or paper is cheaper than a macbook air.  Plus, its compatible with pencils, pens, AND crayons.

(and before any flame wars start, this is also a joke)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we want to split hairs, a couple of reams or paper is cheaper than a macbook air.  Plus, its compatible with pencils, pens, AND crayons.</p>
<p>(and before any flame wars start, this is also a joke)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthus Erea</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42857</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthus Erea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42857</guid>
		<description>True. However, I gave them a lot of leeway by just using half of the hard drive space - still came out on top.

2 ft &quot;thin&quot; eh? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. However, I gave them a lot of leeway by just using half of the hard drive space &#8211; still came out on top.</p>
<p>2 ft &#8220;thin&#8221; eh? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthus Erea</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42855</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthus Erea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42855</guid>
		<description>Man, it&#039;s a joke.

I did think this was a very funny parody. I also think that the Macbook Air is a rather ridiculously expensive device for what you get and would never buy one. Just pointing out that mathematically speaking it is much thicker to use paper. Don&#039;t believe me that someone would use that much paper for stuff which can be done digitally? Walk into a school...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, it&#8217;s a joke.</p>
<p>I did think this was a very funny parody. I also think that the Macbook Air is a rather ridiculously expensive device for what you get and would never buy one. Just pointing out that mathematically speaking it is much thicker to use paper. Don&#8217;t believe me that someone would use that much paper for stuff which can be done digitally? Walk into a school&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamen</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42825</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42825</guid>
		<description>You just made my day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just made my day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42816</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42816</guid>
		<description>Arthus,

Ahh you fell into the Megabyte trap that computer manufacturers lay.  If you look closely, there&#039;s a little superscript &quot;2&quot; after the specifications for the hard drive.  Upon scrolling, you find this:

1GB=1 billion bytes. Actual formatted capacity less.

So... Let&#039;s say we use your formula but instead use 64,000,000 bytes as our starting point.  That gives us 62,500 usable space.  Now we all know that you can print out source/object code, so more appropriately we should factor in the entire storage of the drive including the operating system.  Therefore, I charge that when printed, the contents of a full MacBook Air would be:

If a sheet of paper = 0.5 mb, then 62,500/0.5 = 125,000 sheets of paper.  Then using our incredibly thin tracing paper (0.05mm thick):

125,000*0.05 = 6250 mm thick, about 2 feet thick.

Got it?  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthus,</p>
<p>Ahh you fell into the Megabyte trap that computer manufacturers lay.  If you look closely, there&#8217;s a little superscript &#8220;2&#8243; after the specifications for the hard drive.  Upon scrolling, you find this:</p>
<p>1GB=1 billion bytes. Actual formatted capacity less.</p>
<p>So&#8230; Let&#8217;s say we use your formula but instead use 64,000,000 bytes as our starting point.  That gives us 62,500 usable space.  Now we all know that you can print out source/object code, so more appropriately we should factor in the entire storage of the drive including the operating system.  Therefore, I charge that when printed, the contents of a full MacBook Air would be:</p>
<p>If a sheet of paper = 0.5 mb, then 62,500/0.5 = 125,000 sheets of paper.  Then using our incredibly thin tracing paper (0.05mm thick):</p>
<p>125,000*0.05 = 6250 mm thick, about 2 feet thick.</p>
<p>Got it?  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42770</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42770</guid>
		<description>It appears as if you may have missed the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears as if you may have missed the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthus Erea</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42746</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthus Erea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42746</guid>
		<description>While your device may be cheaper, it is certainly not thinner or lighter.

You see: you are comparing the wrong models. You are using the single-unit model, when in fact many reams should be compared instead.

According to Ray Larson of Berkley, one printed paper can hold approximately 5kb. However, to be more generous let&#039;s say that a single printed sheet can hold half of a MB.

The default Macbook Air ships with an 80 gb hard drive. However, for the sake of the comparison, let us assume you go with a solid state disk (which would include similar quality controls to paper), which is 64 gb.

1 gb = 1024 mb. Therefore, 64 gb * 1024 = 65536 mb.

Let us assume that half of that space is used for the operating system and applications. Thus, we are left with 32768 mb to store documents on.

If a sheet of paper = 0.5 mb, then 32778/0.5 = 65536 pages of paper.

Generally accepted is that a sheet of standard paper is 0.1 mm thick. However, to give you the benefit of the doubt, I will say that it is 0.05 mm thick.

65536*0.05=3276.8 mm thick

Now, the MacBook Air is 19.4 mm thick at it&#039;s thickest point. 3276.8 - 19.4 = 3257 mm. So, your device must actually be 3257 mm thick to achieve similar functionality to the Macbook Air. Busted!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While your device may be cheaper, it is certainly not thinner or lighter.</p>
<p>You see: you are comparing the wrong models. You are using the single-unit model, when in fact many reams should be compared instead.</p>
<p>According to Ray Larson of Berkley, one printed paper can hold approximately 5kb. However, to be more generous let&#8217;s say that a single printed sheet can hold half of a MB.</p>
<p>The default Macbook Air ships with an 80 gb hard drive. However, for the sake of the comparison, let us assume you go with a solid state disk (which would include similar quality controls to paper), which is 64 gb.</p>
<p>1 gb = 1024 mb. Therefore, 64 gb * 1024 = 65536 mb.</p>
<p>Let us assume that half of that space is used for the operating system and applications. Thus, we are left with 32768 mb to store documents on.</p>
<p>If a sheet of paper = 0.5 mb, then 32778/0.5 = 65536 pages of paper.</p>
<p>Generally accepted is that a sheet of standard paper is 0.1 mm thick. However, to give you the benefit of the doubt, I will say that it is 0.05 mm thick.</p>
<p>65536*0.05=3276.8 mm thick</p>
<p>Now, the MacBook Air is 19.4 mm thick at it&#8217;s thickest point. 3276.8 &#8211; 19.4 = 3257 mm. So, your device must actually be 3257 mm thick to achieve similar functionality to the Macbook Air. Busted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaVeda H. Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42693</link>
		<dc:creator>LaVeda H. Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/01/30/a-thinner-and-cheaper-alternative-to-the-macbook-air/#comment-42693</guid>
		<description>OMG!! Too funny!! And the people said, &quot;AMEN!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG!! Too funny!! And the people said, &#8220;AMEN!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
