<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM joins OpenOffice.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/11/ibm-joins-openofficeorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/11/ibm-joins-openofficeorg/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:29:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/11/ibm-joins-openofficeorg/#comment-14646</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/11/ibm-joins-openofficeorg/#comment-14646</guid>
		<description>@Shuva:  Many companies are still using Lotus Notes.

So if they&#039;re going to be using OOo technology, does this mean a Lotus branded version of OOo (much like Sun does with Star Office)?

-A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shuva:  Many companies are still using Lotus Notes.</p>
<p>So if they&#8217;re going to be using OOo technology, does this mean a Lotus branded version of OOo (much like Sun does with Star Office)?</p>
<p>-A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shuva</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/11/ibm-joins-openofficeorg/#comment-14634</link>
		<dc:creator>Shuva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/11/ibm-joins-openofficeorg/#comment-14634</guid>
		<description>I like the first part of the news, but not the news about Lotus integration. I think its time for IBM to move away from Lotus, there are far better collaboration software existing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the first part of the news, but not the news about Lotus integration. I think its time for IBM to move away from Lotus, there are far better collaboration software existing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
