<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: New Sharp LCD does multi-touch and scanning</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/04/new-sharp-lcd-display-does-multi-touch-and-scanning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/04/new-sharp-lcd-display-does-multi-touch-and-scanning/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: 10668844</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/04/new-sharp-lcd-display-does-multi-touch-and-scanning/#comment-13953</link> <dc:creator>10668844</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/04/new-sharp-lcd-display-does-multi-touch-and-scanning/#comment-13953</guid> <description>I&#039;m a big fan of multi-touch displays, but why has it taken so long for the technology to appear?  Why did it take Apple to be the one?  The tech isn&#039;t all that new, and we&#039;ve been dealing with the mouse and keyboard as the primary interface for a long time, why the holdup in new user interfaces? Can anyone answer this for me? Yes, I&#039;m also one of those guys that questions if we really went to the moon back in 1969.  I have a big issue whenever the needed tech seems to either to far ahead or to far behind to make a story realistic. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m a big fan of multi-touch displays, but why has it taken so long for the technology to appear?  Why did it take Apple to be the one?  The tech isn&#039;t all that new, and we&#039;ve been dealing with the mouse and keyboard as the primary interface for a long time, why the holdup in new user interfaces?</p><p>Can anyone answer this for me?</p><p>Yes, I&#039;m also one of those guys that questions if we really went to the moon back in 1969.  I have a big issue whenever the needed tech seems to either to far ahead or to far behind to make a story realistic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 10668844</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/04/new-sharp-lcd-display-does-multi-touch-and-scanning/#comment-263030</link> <dc:creator>10668844</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/04/new-sharp-lcd-display-does-multi-touch-and-scanning/#comment-263030</guid> <description>I&#039;m a big fan of multi-touch displays, but why has it taken so long for the technology to appear?  Why did it take Apple to be the one?  The tech isn&#039;t all that new, and we&#039;ve been dealing with the mouse and keyboard as the primary interface for a long time, why the holdup in new user interfaces?Can anyone answer this for me?Yes, I&#039;m also one of those guys that questions if we really went to the moon back in 1969.  I have a big issue whenever the needed tech seems to either to far ahead or to far behind to make a story realistic.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of multi-touch displays, but why has it taken so long for the technology to appear?  Why did it take Apple to be the one?  The tech isn&#8217;t all that new, and we&#8217;ve been dealing with the mouse and keyboard as the primary interface for a long time, why the holdup in new user interfaces?</p><p>Can anyone answer this for me?</p><p>Yes, I&#8217;m also one of those guys that questions if we really went to the moon back in 1969.  I have a big issue whenever the needed tech seems to either to far ahead or to far behind to make a story realistic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 06:56:57 -->
