<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Sharp LCD does multi-touch and scanning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/04/new-sharp-lcd-display-does-multi-touch-and-scanning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/04/new-sharp-lcd-display-does-multi-touch-and-scanning/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 10668844</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/04/new-sharp-lcd-display-does-multi-touch-and-scanning/#comment-13953</link>
		<dc:creator>10668844</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/09/04/new-sharp-lcd-display-does-multi-touch-and-scanning/#comment-13953</guid>
		<description>I'm a big fan of multi-touch displays, but why has it taken so long for the technology to appear?  Why did it take Apple to be the one?  The tech isn't all that new, and we've been dealing with the mouse and keyboard as the primary interface for a long time, why the holdup in new user interfaces?  

Can anyone answer this for me?  

Yes, I'm also one of those guys that questions if we really went to the moon back in 1969.  I have a big issue whenever the needed tech seems to either to far ahead or to far behind to make a story realistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of multi-touch displays, but why has it taken so long for the technology to appear?  Why did it take Apple to be the one?  The tech isn&#8217;t all that new, and we&#8217;ve been dealing with the mouse and keyboard as the primary interface for a long time, why the holdup in new user interfaces?  </p>
<p>Can anyone answer this for me?  </p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m also one of those guys that questions if we really went to the moon back in 1969.  I have a big issue whenever the needed tech seems to either to far ahead or to far behind to make a story realistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
