Comments on: U.S. Unleashes Robot Soldiers With Guns (Video) http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/ tech, science, news and social issues for geeks Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Rob Dunnhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-262741 Rob Dunn Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:54:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-262741 But, does it really surprise you? I mean, it is an easy sell to the public. One less soldier killed while the military sends out remote-controlled killing machines. I'm glad they are not fully autonomous ala (<a href="http://www.bostonaod.com/images/ed209.jpg" rel="nofollow">"You have 20 seconds to comply"</a>)...but this still does add one more layer of separation between the act of killing and humanity. But, does it really surprise you? I mean, it is an easy sell to the public. One less soldier killed while the military sends out remote-controlled killing machines.

I'm glad they are not fully autonomous ala ("You have 20 seconds to comply")…but this still does add one more layer of separation between the act of killing and humanity.

]]> By: Rob Dunnhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-11151 Rob Dunn Mon, 06 Aug 2007 05:54:58 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-11151 But, does it really surprise you? I mean, it is an easy sell to the public. One less soldier killed while the military sends out remote-controlled killing machines. I'm glad they are not fully autonomous ala (<a href="http://www.bostonaod.com/images/ed209.jpg" rel="nofollow">"You have 20 seconds to comply"</a>)...but this still does add one more layer of separation between the act of killing and humanity. But, does it really surprise you? I mean, it is an easy sell to the public. One less soldier killed while the military sends out remote-controlled killing machines.

I'm glad they are not fully autonomous ala ("You have 20 seconds to comply")…but this still does add one more layer of separation between the act of killing and humanity.

]]> By: scrugunhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-10942 scrugun Fri, 03 Aug 2007 21:28:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-10942 This is a very sad example of where America is going. This is a very sad example of where America is going.

]]> By: scrugunhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-262740 scrugun Fri, 03 Aug 2007 21:28:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-262740 This is a very sad example of where America is going. This is a very sad example of where America is going.

]]> By: Network Performance Dailyhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-10928 Network Performance Daily Fri, 03 Aug 2007 20:04:47 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-10928 <strong>Just Too Cool: Interview & Podcast with Paul Moller, inventor of the M200G Volantor flying car....</strong>Although the NetQoS Network Performance Daily blog is usually very focused on matters relating to - what else - network performance and enterprise IT, sometimes we have the opportunity to conduct an interview which doesn't directly deal with IT issues... Just Too Cool: Interview & Podcast with Paul Moller, inventor of the M200G Volantor flying car….

Although the NetQoS Network Performance Daily blog is usually very focused on matters relating to – what else – network performance and enterprise IT, sometimes we have the opportunity to conduct an interview which doesn’t directly deal with IT issues…

]]> By: Kiltakhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-10906 Kiltak Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:16:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-10906 I've looked around a bit, and some organizations define a robot as a "mechanical device that moves automat ically or by remote control".. But I agree, for me, a robot should have some kind of AI that gives it a bit of autonomy.. I'm sure the day where we'll see automated war bots isn't that far off though. I've looked around a bit, and some organizations define a robot as a "mechanical device that moves automat ically or by remote control"..

But I agree, for me, a robot should have some kind of AI that gives it a bit of autonomy.. I'm sure the day where we'll see automated war bots isn't that far off though.

]]> By: Kiltakhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-262739 Kiltak Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:16:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-262739 I've looked around a bit, and some organizations define a robot as a "mechanical device that moves automat ically or by remote control"..But I agree, for me, a robot should have some kind of AI that gives it a bit of autonomy.. I'm sure the day where we'll see automated war bots isn't that far off though. I’ve looked around a bit, and some organizations define a robot as a “mechanical device that moves automat ically or by remote control”..

But I agree, for me, a robot should have some kind of AI that gives it a bit of autonomy.. I’m sure the day where we’ll see automated war bots isn’t that far off though.

]]> By: Rob Dunnhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-10901 Rob Dunn Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:05:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-10901 I dunno - everything is still controlled by humans, but it isn't much different in concept as smart bombs. I kinda dispute the use of the term 'robot' in the case where humans are controlling the device. For some reason, I associate the term robot with autonomy. Am I wrong on that? I dunno – everything is still controlled by humans, but it isn't much different in concept as smart bombs.

I kinda dispute the use of the term 'robot' in the case where humans are controlling the device. For some reason, I associate the term robot with autonomy. Am I wrong on that?

]]> By: Rob Dunnhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-262738 Rob Dunn Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:05:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-262738 I dunno - everything is still controlled by humans, but it isn't much different in concept as smart bombs.I kinda dispute the use of the term 'robot' in the case where humans are controlling the device. For some reason, I associate the term robot with autonomy. Am I wrong on that? I dunno – everything is still controlled by humans, but it isn’t much different in concept as smart bombs.

I kinda dispute the use of the term ‘robot’ in the case where humans are controlling the device. For some reason, I associate the term robot with autonomy. Am I wrong on that?

]]> By: Kiltakhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-10896 Kiltak Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:23:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-10896 The only question I'm asking myself about this is, Will these robots banalize the act of killing other human beings? The only question I'm asking myself about this is, Will these robots banalize the act of killing other human beings?

]]> By: Kiltakhttp://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-262737 Kiltak Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:23:00 +0000 http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/08/03/us-unleashes-robot-soldiers-with-guns/#comment-262737 The only question I'm asking myself about this is, Will these robots banalize the act of killing other human beings? The only question I’m asking myself about this is, Will these robots banalize the act of killing other human beings?

]]>