<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Digital Video under $100.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Ed Kohler</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-6429</link> <dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-6429</guid> <description>It seems like the toughest competition for this will be phones with video capabilities. If people want more quality than that, they&#039;ll probably leapfrog this for a real video camera for only slightly more $. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the toughest competition for this will be phones with video capabilities. If people want more quality than that, they&#039;ll probably leapfrog this for a real video camera for only slightly more $.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed Kohler</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-262353</link> <dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-262353</guid> <description>It seems like the toughest competition for this will be phones with video capabilities. If people want more quality than that, they&#039;ll probably leapfrog this for a real video camera for only slightly more $.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like the toughest competition for this will be phones with video capabilities. If people want more quality than that, they&#8217;ll probably leapfrog this for a real video camera for only slightly more $.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 1st time visitor</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-6315</link> <dc:creator>1st time visitor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-6315</guid> <description>If you are interested in an SD card slot then check out the RCA Small Wonder (mysmallwonder.com). Basically the save device as the Flip Video, but includes an SD slot and flip-out display. The built-in video editing software is different too. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are interested in an SD card slot then check out the RCA Small Wonder (mysmallwonder.com). Basically the save device as the Flip Video, but includes an SD slot and flip-out display. The built-in video editing software is different too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 1st time visitor</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-262352</link> <dc:creator>1st time visitor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-262352</guid> <description>If you are interested in an SD card slot then check out the RCA Small Wonder (mysmallwonder.com). Basically the save device as the Flip Video, but includes an SD slot and flip-out display. The built-in video editing software is different too.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are interested in an SD card slot then check out the RCA Small Wonder (mysmallwonder.com). Basically the save device as the Flip Video, but includes an SD slot and flip-out display. The built-in video editing software is different too.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-6311</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-6311</guid> <description>I don&#039;t think that I would consider buying this, however if it had an SD card slot I would have to rethink it. 30 minutes to an hour just isn&#039;t enough time. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think that I would consider buying this, however if it had an SD card slot I would have to rethink it. 30 minutes to an hour just isn&#039;t enough time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-262351</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/06/07/digital-video-under-100/#comment-262351</guid> <description>I don&#039;t think that I would consider buying this, however if it had an SD card slot I would have to rethink it. 30 minutes to an hour just isn&#039;t enough time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that I would consider buying this, however if it had an SD card slot I would have to rethink it. 30 minutes to an hour just isn&#8217;t enough time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/14 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-13 21:55:45 -->
