<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Unifies Search Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/18/google-unifies-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/18/google-unifies-search-results/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sujeet</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/18/google-unifies-search-results/#comment-5026</link>
		<dc:creator>Sujeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 21:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/18/google-unifies-search-results/#comment-5026</guid>
		<description>I personally think this is a bad idea.  I'm smart enough to decide if I'm searching for images, news, blog entries, etc, and I search accordingly.  I don't want my search results cluttered up with all this junk that I'm NOT looking for.

Keep it up Google, and you'll become the next Altavista!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think this is a bad idea.  I&#8217;m smart enough to decide if I&#8217;m searching for images, news, blog entries, etc, and I search accordingly.  I don&#8217;t want my search results cluttered up with all this junk that I&#8217;m NOT looking for.</p>
<p>Keep it up Google, and you&#8217;ll become the next Altavista!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiltak</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/18/google-unifies-search-results/#comment-4952</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiltak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 20:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/18/google-unifies-search-results/#comment-4952</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I agree, it all depends on how they present the data. I guess we'll have to wait until next wednesday to know :)

Hmmm, I wonder how this change will affect search traffic on sites and blogs. it will be certainly interesting to track the activity in our stats engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I agree, it all depends on how they present the data. I guess we&#8217;ll have to wait until next wednesday to know <img src='http://www.geeksaresexy.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hmmm, I wonder how this change will affect search traffic on sites and blogs. it will be certainly interesting to track the activity in our stats engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/18/google-unifies-search-results/#comment-4937</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 18:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/18/google-unifies-search-results/#comment-4937</guid>
		<description>Good thing for users.  I'd like to get it all in one place instead of searching the web and then searching images and then possibly news.  This, of course, depends on implementation.  If the results stay clean and easily identifiable, I don't see it added more confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing for users.  I&#8217;d like to get it all in one place instead of searching the web and then searching images and then possibly news.  This, of course, depends on implementation.  If the results stay clean and easily identifiable, I don&#8217;t see it added more confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
