<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Taking human stupidity to new extremes: Click here to infect your PC</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: Don</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-53857</link> <dc:creator>Don</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-53857</guid> <description>As an expert in paid search ads, I can tell you these numbers don&#039;t mean a whole lot.  It&#039;s a click-through rate of only 0.15%, which would be considered by most as a failed ad.  Also, chances are that most of these impressions didn&#039;t come from people search on security terms, and were probably shown on Google&#039;s network of sites that agree to show ads for a cut of the money. Now if this was done on a more targeted level, we could probably get some more intriguing details. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an expert in paid search ads, I can tell you these numbers don&#039;t mean a whole lot.  It&#039;s a click-through rate of only 0.15%, which would be considered by most as a failed ad.  Also, chances are that most of these impressions didn&#039;t come from people search on security terms, and were probably shown on Google&#039;s network of sites that agree to show ads for a cut of the money.</p><p>Now if this was done on a more targeted level, we could probably get some more intriguing details.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262239</link> <dc:creator>Don</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262239</guid> <description>As an expert in paid search ads, I can tell you these numbers don&#039;t mean a whole lot.  It&#039;s a click-through rate of only 0.15%, which would be considered by most as a failed ad.  Also, chances are that most of these impressions didn&#039;t come from people search on security terms, and were probably shown on Google&#039;s network of sites that agree to show ads for a cut of the money. Now if this was done on a more targeted level, we could probably get some more intriguing details.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an expert in paid search ads, I can tell you these numbers don&#8217;t mean a whole lot.  It&#8217;s a click-through rate of only 0.15%, which would be considered by most as a failed ad.  Also, chances are that most of these impressions didn&#8217;t come from people search on security terms, and were probably shown on Google&#8217;s network of sites that agree to show ads for a cut of the money.<br /> Now if this was done on a more targeted level, we could probably get some more intriguing details.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Angelina</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-5133</link> <dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-5133</guid> <description>That sounds funny :) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds funny :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Angelina</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262238</link> <dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262238</guid> <description>That sounds funny :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds funny :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rob dunn</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-4944</link> <dc:creator>Rob dunn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-4944</guid> <description>Remember though, Windows caters to the lowest common denominator much more than Apple or Linux does.  Not to say all Windows users are part of this &quot;low-denominator&quot; category, but it is more than likely that most low-denominator users are Windows users.  Also, Linux/Mac has that &quot;but its different&quot; stigma that many people don&#039;t like to grapple with. Most folks who use computers at their jobs use Windows, so they will naturally purchase a PC with Windows on it at home.  Every single company I&#039;ve ever worked at has used Windows as their desktop OS...and this includes working in the Public sector. People who use Macs &amp; Linux at work are probably more than likely system admins/tech-heads or graphics artists (again, a generalization), all of whom are a bit more savvy when it comes to what/what not to click on when on the Internet. So I think the only real data this survey gave us was that the people who clicked on that link weren&#039;t thinking, clicked accidentally, were security professionals (as stated above) or were just ignorant...I suspect it is a combination of all these - too bad there wasn&#039;t a poll at the website asking the people these questions! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember though, Windows caters to the lowest common denominator much more than Apple or Linux does.  Not to say all Windows users are part of this &quot;low-denominator&quot; category, but it is more than likely that most low-denominator users are Windows users.  Also, Linux/Mac has that &quot;but its different&quot; stigma that many people don&#039;t like to grapple with.</p><p>Most folks who use computers at their jobs use Windows, so they will naturally purchase a PC with Windows on it at home.  Every single company I&#039;ve ever worked at has used Windows as their desktop OS&#8230;and this includes working in the Public sector.</p><p>People who use Macs &amp; Linux at work are probably more than likely system admins/tech-heads or graphics artists (again, a generalization), all of whom are a bit more savvy when it comes to what/what not to click on when on the Internet.</p><p>So I think the only real data this survey gave us was that the people who clicked on that link weren&#039;t thinking, clicked accidentally, were security professionals (as stated above) or were just ignorant&#8230;I suspect it is a combination of all these &#8211; too bad there wasn&#039;t a poll at the website asking the people these questions!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rob dunn</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262237</link> <dc:creator>Rob dunn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262237</guid> <description>Remember though, Windows caters to the lowest common denominator much more than Apple or Linux does.  Not to say all Windows users are part of this &quot;low-denominator&quot; category, but it is more than likely that most low-denominator users are Windows users.  Also, Linux/Mac has that &quot;but its different&quot; stigma that many people don&#039;t like to grapple with.Most folks who use computers at their jobs use Windows, so they will naturally purchase a PC with Windows on it at home.  Every single company I&#039;ve ever worked at has used Windows as their desktop OS...and this includes working in the Public sector.People who use Macs &amp; Linux at work are probably more than likely system admins/tech-heads or graphics artists (again, a generalization), all of whom are a bit more savvy when it comes to what/what not to click on when on the Internet.So I think the only real data this survey gave us was that the people who clicked on that link weren&#039;t thinking, clicked accidentally, were security professionals (as stated above) or were just ignorant...I suspect it is a combination of all these - too bad there wasn&#039;t a poll at the website asking the people these questions!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember though, Windows caters to the lowest common denominator much more than Apple or Linux does.  Not to say all Windows users are part of this &#8220;low-denominator&#8221; category, but it is more than likely that most low-denominator users are Windows users.  Also, Linux/Mac has that &#8220;but its different&#8221; stigma that many people don&#8217;t like to grapple with.</p><p>Most folks who use computers at their jobs use Windows, so they will naturally purchase a PC with Windows on it at home.  Every single company I&#8217;ve ever worked at has used Windows as their desktop OS&#8230;and this includes working in the Public sector.</p><p>People who use Macs &amp; Linux at work are probably more than likely system admins/tech-heads or graphics artists (again, a generalization), all of whom are a bit more savvy when it comes to what/what not to click on when on the Internet.</p><p>So I think the only real data this survey gave us was that the people who clicked on that link weren&#8217;t thinking, clicked accidentally, were security professionals (as stated above) or were just ignorant&#8230;I suspect it is a combination of all these &#8211; too bad there wasn&#8217;t a poll at the website asking the people these questions!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: links for 2007-05-18 &#124; Mansoor Nathani's Blog</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-4885</link> <dc:creator>links for 2007-05-18 &#124; Mansoor Nathani's Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:40:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-4885</guid> <description>[...] Taking human stupidity to new extremes: Click here to infect your PC [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Taking human stupidity to new extremes: Click here to infect your PC [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kiltak</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262236</link> <dc:creator>Kiltak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262236</guid> <description>Did you know that there are ways to unformat a formated drive? :) Back then, there was a DOS utility named &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csulb.edu/~murdock/unformat.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;unformat&lt;/a&gt;. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that there are ways to unformat a formated drive? :) Back then, there was a DOS utility named <a href="http://www.csulb.edu/~murdock/unformat.html" rel="nofollow">unformat</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cannonball</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-4823</link> <dc:creator>Cannonball</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-4823</guid> <description>It is a fantastic article. Still I can&#039;t forget the day, sooo many years ago, I was formatting a floppy on the work notebook of a friend, and after digiting: c:&gt; format c: when the system asked if I really was sure, I told myself &quot;funny, i&#039;m never asked this question when I am formatting a floppy&quot;, and I answered yes... geez, then I understood the sentence &quot;I&#039;ve never seen a mistake I could never do&quot; by Johann W. Goethe! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a fantastic article.</p><p>Still I can&#039;t forget the day, sooo many years ago, I was formatting a floppy on the work notebook of a friend, and after digiting:</p><p>c:&gt; format c:</p><p>when the system asked if I really was sure, I told myself &quot;funny, i&#039;m never asked this question when I am formatting a floppy&quot;, and I answered yes&#8230;</p><p>geez, then I understood the sentence &quot;I&#039;ve never seen a mistake I could never do&quot; by Johann W. Goethe!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cannonball</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262235</link> <dc:creator>Cannonball</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262235</guid> <description>It is a fantastic article. Still I can&#039;t forget the day, sooo many years ago, I was formatting a floppy on the work notebook of a friend, and after digiting: c:&gt; format c: when the system asked if I really was sure, I told myself &quot;funny, i&#039;m never asked this question when I am formatting a floppy&quot;, and I answered yes... geez, then I understood the sentence &quot;I&#039;ve never seen a mistake I could never do&quot; by Johann W. Goethe!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a fantastic article.<br /> Still I can&#8217;t forget the day, sooo many years ago, I was formatting a floppy on the work notebook of a friend, and after digiting:<br /> c:&gt; format c:<br /> when the system asked if I really was sure, I told myself &#8220;funny, i&#8217;m never asked this question when I am formatting a floppy&#8221;, and I answered yes&#8230;<br /> geez, then I understood the sentence &#8220;I&#8217;ve never seen a mistake I could never do&#8221; by Johann W. Goethe!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sixties</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-4819</link> <dc:creator>sixties</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 09:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-4819</guid> <description>Yes I agree... it doen&#039;t mean anything. People are curious to know what hides behind this strange link. I agree that a lot of people aren&#039;t critical when they surf the web but this is not a common case. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree&#8230; it doen&#039;t mean anything.</p><p>People are curious to know what hides behind this strange link.</p><p>I agree that a lot of people aren&#039;t critical when they surf the web but this is not a common case.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sixties</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262234</link> <dc:creator>sixties</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 09:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/16/taking-human-stupidity-to-new-extremes-click-here-to-infect-your-pc/#comment-262234</guid> <description>Yes I agree... it doen&#039;t mean anything.People are curious to know what hides behind this strange link.I agree that a lot of people aren&#039;t critical when they surf the web but this is not a common case.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree&#8230; it doen&#8217;t mean anything.</p><p>People are curious to know what hides behind this strange link.</p><p>I agree that a lot of people aren&#8217;t critical when they surf the web but this is not a common case.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 07:36:26 -->
