<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: EndPointScan: Scan your network for USB-related security risks</title> <atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/</link> <description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <item><title>By: akaljian</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-324566</link> <dc:creator>akaljian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:44:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-324566</guid> <description>I just came across this article and the related tool. It still is a valid link but I don&#039;t think it works correctly anymore with IE8 or above as I had trouble getting the report to show up. Further since it discusses windows xp, it may be way behind in its usefullness. I see most of these comments are from years ago so I don&#039;t know how current this article actually is. Perhaps the author could refresh it and see if it is still valid. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across this article and the related tool. It still is a valid link but I don&#039;t think it works correctly anymore with IE8 or above as I had trouble getting the report to show up.</p><p>Further since it discusses windows xp, it may be way behind in its usefullness.</p><p> I see most of these comments are from years ago so I don&#039;t know how current this article actually is. Perhaps the author could refresh it and see if it is still valid.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: leif lynch</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-147267</link> <dc:creator>leif lynch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-147267</guid> <description>It is a good tool if you need to monitor the use of drives. But if you are worried about data loss/theft the best way to combat usb devices is to disable the usbstor capabilities. Not only can they be used to steal data, if i ever wanted to break into a company&#039;s network I would spend $20-30 and drop a few usb devices in the parking lot of your business. Thanks for the back door. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good tool if you need to monitor the use of drives. But if you are worried about data loss/theft the best way to combat usb devices is to disable the usbstor capabilities. Not only can they be used to steal data, if i ever wanted to break into a company&#039;s network I would spend $20-30 and drop a few usb devices in the parking lot of your business. Thanks for the back door.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: leif lynch</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-262199</link> <dc:creator>leif lynch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-262199</guid> <description>It is a good tool if you need to monitor the use of drives. But if you are worried about data loss/theft the best way to combat usb devices is to disable the usbstor capabilities. Not only can they be used to steal data, if i ever wanted to break into a company&#039;s network I would spend $20-30 and drop a few usb devices in the parking lot of your business. Thanks for the back door.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good tool if you need to monitor the use of drives. But if you are worried about data loss/theft the best way to combat usb devices is to disable the usbstor capabilities. Not only can they be used to steal data, if i ever wanted to break into a company&#8217;s network I would spend $20-30 and drop a few usb devices in the parking lot of your business. Thanks for the back door.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neal Harvey</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-262198</link> <dc:creator>Neal Harvey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-262198</guid> <description>Nice one! Thanks for the tip! Last year we had some security incidents with stealing of sensitive project data. Since that time we have started to pay more attention to usb security. Now we use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/desktopauthority&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;desktop authority&lt;/a&gt; as a desktop management solution and we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/desktopauthority/usbsecurity.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;control usb devices&lt;/a&gt; with this tool as well. What I really like in this solution is that you can block or limit access to a particlular device on a particular pc. For example, you can block the use of pocket PCs, palms and blackberries for some departments or OUs. In addition you can limit the use of usb devices according to their serial numbers, for example, allowing the use of only company issued usb storage or even put some devices on a black list. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one! Thanks for the tip!</p><p>Last year we had some security incidents with stealing of sensitive project data.</p><p>Since that time we have started to pay more attention to usb security. Now we use <a href="http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/desktopauthority" rel="nofollow">desktop authority</a> as a desktop management solution and we <a href="http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/desktopauthority/usbsecurity.asp" rel="nofollow">control usb devices</a> with this tool as well.</p><p>What I really like in this solution is that you can block or limit access to a particlular device on a particular pc.</p><p>For example, you can block the use of pocket PCs, palms and blackberries for some departments or OUs.</p><p>In addition you can limit the use of usb devices according to their serial numbers, for example, allowing the use of only company issued usb storage or even put some devices on a black list.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neal Harvey</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-52075</link> <dc:creator>Neal Harvey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:11:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-52075</guid> <description>Nice one! Thanks for the tip! Last year we had some security incidents with stealing of sensitive project data. Since that time we have started to pay more attention to usb security. Now we use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/desktopauthority&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;desktop authority&lt;/a&gt; as a desktop management solution and we &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/desktopauthority/usbsecurity.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;control usb devices&lt;/a&gt; with this tool as well. What I really like in this solution is that you can block or limit access to a particlular device on a particular pc. For example, you can block the use of pocket PCs, palms and blackberries for some departments or OUs. In addition you can limit the use of usb devices according to their serial numbers, for example, allowing the use of only company issued usb storage or even put some devices on a black list. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one! Thanks for the tip!</p><p>Last year we had some security incidents with stealing of sensitive project data.</p><p>Since that time we have started to pay more attention to usb security. Now we use <a href="http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/desktopauthority" rel="nofollow">desktop authority</a> as a desktop management solution and we <a href="http://www.scriptlogic.com/products/desktopauthority/usbsecurity.asp" rel="nofollow">control usb devices</a> with this tool as well.</p><p>What I really like in this solution is that you can block or limit access to a particlular device on a particular pc.</p><p>For example, you can block the use of pocket PCs, palms and blackberries for some departments or OUs.</p><p>In addition you can limit the use of usb devices according to their serial numbers, for example, allowing the use of only company issued usb storage or even put some devices on a black list.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bo</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-45122</link> <dc:creator>bo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-45122</guid> <description>great tool </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great tool</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bo</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-262197</link> <dc:creator>bo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-262197</guid> <description>great tool</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great tool</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kiltak</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-4389</link> <dc:creator>Kiltak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-4389</guid> <description>Good point Matthew .. I had the exact same thought at first, but since GFI is one of the company that I&#039;ve been trusting for a while, I decided to test the application anyways. With the ever increasing number of firefox users, I think GFI should definitely look at a way to code their application to be usable in multiple browsers I can understand why they made it that way though. Since ActiveX is proprietary and is made to work under IE and Windows, coding applications that access the operating system with it must be a lot faster and effective. I know there is a Firefox plugin(s?) that permit people to use ActiveX under Mozilla&#039;s browser, so maybe GFI should look at a way to use this to their advantage. Some browser independant code would still be the best solution, but we don&#039;t live in a perfect world, and sometimes, we don&#039;t always get what we want right away :) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Matthew .. I had the exact same thought at first, but since GFI is one of the company that I&#039;ve been trusting for a while, I decided to test the application anyways. With the ever increasing number of firefox users, I think GFI should definitely look at a way to code their application to be usable in multiple browsers</p><p>I can understand why they made it that way though. Since ActiveX is proprietary and is made to work under IE and Windows, coding applications that access the operating system with it must be a lot faster and effective.</p><p>I know there is a Firefox plugin(s?) that permit people to use ActiveX under Mozilla&#039;s browser, so maybe GFI should look at a way to use this to their advantage. Some browser independant code would still be the best solution, but we don&#039;t live in a perfect world, and sometimes, we don&#039;t always get what we want right away :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kiltak</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-262196</link> <dc:creator>Kiltak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-262196</guid> <description>Good point Matthew .. I had the exact same thought at first, but since GFI is one of the company that I&#039;ve been trusting for a while, I decided to test the application anyways. With the ever increasing number of firefox users, I think GFI should definitely look at a way to code their application to be usable in multiple browsersI can understand why they made it that way though. Since ActiveX is proprietary and is made to work under IE and Windows, coding applications that access the operating system with it must be a lot faster and effective.I know there is a Firefox plugin(s?) that permit people to use ActiveX under Mozilla&#039;s browser, so maybe GFI should look at a way to use this to their advantage. Some browser independant code would still be the best solution, but we don&#039;t live in a perfect world, and sometimes, we don&#039;t always get what we want right away :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Matthew .. I had the exact same thought at first, but since GFI is one of the company that I&#8217;ve been trusting for a while, I decided to test the application anyways. With the ever increasing number of firefox users, I think GFI should definitely look at a way to code their application to be usable in multiple browsers</p><p>I can understand why they made it that way though. Since ActiveX is proprietary and is made to work under IE and Windows, coding applications that access the operating system with it must be a lot faster and effective.</p><p>I know there is a Firefox plugin(s?) that permit people to use ActiveX under Mozilla&#8217;s browser, so maybe GFI should look at a way to use this to their advantage. Some browser independant code would still be the best solution, but we don&#8217;t live in a perfect world, and sometimes, we don&#8217;t always get what we want right away :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matthew Musgrove</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-4382</link> <dc:creator>Matthew Musgrove</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-4382</guid> <description>It&#039;s a pity that they chose to implement this as an ActiveX control because that limits the number of end users.  &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://www.endpointscan.com/&quot;&gt;Requirements for the test * Windows 2000, XP or 2003 as operating system. Not Windows 9X or NT! * Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 or later with Internet security settings set to Medium. Please note that this version of EndPointScan does not work with Mozilla FireFox. NOTE: You need administrator rights and privileges to set Internet security settings and execute EndPointScan.&lt;/blockquote&gt; Most IT professionals are wary of ActiveX controls and Internet Explorer in general. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s a pity that they chose to implement this as an ActiveX control because that limits the number of end users.  &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;<a href="http://www.endpointscan.com/&quot;&gt;Requirements" rel="nofollow">http://www.endpointscan.com/&quot;&gt;Requirements</a> for the test</p><p> * Windows 2000, XP or 2003 as operating system. Not Windows 9X or NT!</p><p> * Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 or later with Internet security settings set to Medium. Please note that this version of EndPointScan does not work with Mozilla FireFox.</p><p> NOTE: You need administrator rights and privileges to set Internet security settings and execute EndPointScan.</p><p>Most IT professionals are wary of ActiveX controls and Internet Explorer in general.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matthew Musgrove</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-262195</link> <dc:creator>Matthew Musgrove</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-262195</guid> <description>It&#039;s a pity that they chose to implement this as an ActiveX control because that limits the number of end users.  &lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://www.endpointscan.com/&quot;&gt;Requirements for the test* Windows 2000, XP or 2003 as operating system. Not Windows 9X or NT! * Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 or later with Internet security settings set to Medium. Please note that this version of EndPointScan does not work with Mozilla FireFox. NOTE: You need administrator rights and privileges to set Internet security settings and execute EndPointScan.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Most IT professionals are wary of ActiveX controls and Internet Explorer in general.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a pity that they chose to implement this as an ActiveX control because that limits the number of end users.<br /><blockquote cite="http://www.endpointscan.com/">Requirements for the test</p><p> * Windows 2000, XP or 2003 as operating system. Not Windows 9X or NT!<br /> * Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 or later with Internet security settings set to Medium. Please note that this version of EndPointScan does not work with Mozilla FireFox.<br /> NOTE: You need administrator rights and privileges to set Internet security settings and execute EndPointScan.</p></blockquote><p>Most IT professionals are wary of ActiveX controls and Internet Explorer in general.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jean-Marc</title><link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-4371</link> <dc:creator>Jean-Marc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/05/10/endpointscan-scan-your-network-for-usb-related-security-risks/#comment-4371</guid> <description>Hey guys, great post (again). I work as a sys admin for the public sector and we are constantly on the lookout new ways to track security risks. Over the last few years, portable devices have been a &#8220;sword of Damocles&#8221; of sorts hanging over our heads waiting to fall. I, and my colleagues, feel that they are a far greater risk to security (not to mention data integrity and confidentiality risks as well) than upper management is willing to recognize. This tool will help us in our research for effective solutions. Keep up the good work! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys,</p><p>great post (again). I work as a sys admin for the public sector and we are constantly on the lookout new ways to track security risks. Over the last few years, portable devices have been a &ldquo;sword of Damocles&rdquo; of sorts hanging over our heads waiting to fall. I, and my colleagues, feel that they are a far greater risk to security (not to mention data integrity and confidentiality risks as well) than upper management is willing to recognize. This tool will help us in our research for effective solutions.</p><p>Keep up the good work!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via blog.geeksaresexytech.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.geeksaresexy.net @ 2012-02-14 07:10:26 -->
