<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blu-Ray Owns Hi-Def DVD Market Over HD-DVD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/04/24/blu-ray-owns-hi-def-dvd-market-over-hd-dvd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/04/24/blu-ray-owns-hi-def-dvd-market-over-hd-dvd/</link>
	<description>tech, science, news and social issues for geeks</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 'tude</title>
		<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/04/24/blu-ray-owns-hi-def-dvd-market-over-hd-dvd/#comment-3187</link>
		<dc:creator>'tude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2007/04/24/blu-ray-owns-hi-def-dvd-market-over-hd-dvd/#comment-3187</guid>
		<description>Might want to put this into a little perspective.  Ars Technica has an excellent article on this subjet, "Why early high-def disc adoption rates don't really matter".

URL: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070423-why-early-high-def-disc-adoption-rates-dont-really-matter.html

Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might want to put this into a little perspective.  Ars Technica has an excellent article on this subjet, &#8220;Why early high-def disc adoption rates don&#8217;t really matter&#8221;.</p>
<p>URL: <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070423-why-early-high-def-disc-adoption-rates-dont-really-matter.html" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070423-why-early-high-def-disc-adoption-rates-dont-really-matter.html</a></p>
<p>Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
